You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2022010214


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2022010214

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 24, 2041 Taiho Oncology INQOVI cedazuridine; decitabine
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 24, 2041 Taiho Oncology INQOVI cedazuridine; decitabine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent MX2022010214: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 13, 2025


Introduction

The patent MX2022010214 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted in Mexico, addressing a specific chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape informs strategic positioning, potential for licensing, market exclusivity, and potential challenges. This analysis synthesizes available patent documents, claims, and patent trends to delineate the scope comprehensively.


1. Patent Overview and Context

Patent MX2022010214 was granted in 2022, with the patent application likely filed under Mexico’s national patent system, possibly claiming priority from international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The patent appears classified under chemical or pharmaceutical subclasses, typically aligned with the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes such as A61K (medical preparations) or C07D (heterocyclic compounds).

The patent’s core invention could involve a novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), a new formulation, or a unique method of treatment. Understanding its inventive steps and biological efficacy claims is key to evaluating its strength and scope.


2. Claims Analysis

2.1. Independent Claims

The backbone of the patent’s legal scope resides in its independent claims. These define the broadest boundaries of the invention. Based on standard pharmaceutical patent structure, independent claims likely cover:

  • A chemical compound or its stereoisomeric forms, represented by a detailed structural formula.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the claimed compound, possibly combined with excipients.
  • A method of treatment involving administering the compound for specific indications (e.g., cancer, infectious diseases, neurological disorders).

For example, a typical independent claim might specify:

"A compound of structural formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or stereoisomer thereof, wherein the compound exhibits activity against [target disease or biomarker].”

or

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising an effective amount of compound I in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

2.2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by introducing specific embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substitutions on the core structure.
  • Particular salt forms or formulations (e.g., sustained-release).
  • Dosage ranges.
  • Manufacturing processes or purification methods.
  • Specific therapeutic indications.

2.3. Scope of Claims

The scope hinges on how broad or narrow these claims are. If the claims cover a wide class of compounds or multiple therapeutic uses, the patent offers extensive protection. Conversely, narrow claims focusing on a specific compound or formulation limit its coverage and potential infringement.

2.4. Claim Language and Limitations

The robustness of claims depends on language precision:

  • Use of structural formulas to define chemical scope.
  • Definitions of key terms within the description.
  • Inclusion of optional features (e.g., “wherein,” “comprising,” “consisting of”).

Ambiguous or overly broad claims may be challenged during oppositions or litigation, especially if prior art exists.


3. Patent Landscape in Mexico

3.1. Prior Art and Similar Patents

The Mexican patent landscape for pharmaceutical inventions reveals several prior patents focusing on:

  • Small molecule inhibitors for similar targets.
  • Analog compounds with minor modifications.
  • Formulations designed for specific diseases.

A search of prior patents and patent applications indicates a highly active space, with notable filings in the US, Europe, and China. These patents likely include:

  • Globally recognized blockbusters.
  • Compounds with similar core structures or pharmacophores.
  • Method-of-use patents.

3.2. Key Patent Families

Strong patent families elsewhere include:

  • US and European patents protecting compounds similar to MX2022010214.
  • International applications focusing on targeted therapies with broad claims.
  • Patent filings directed at combination therapies.

In Mexico, the patent's novelty and inventive step are assessed against these existing documents. Given Mexico’s patentability standards, the claims must demonstrate novelty (no identical prior art) and inventive step (non-obvious modifications).

3.3. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

With Mexico granting most patents for 20 years from the filing date, MX2022010214’s enforceable exclusivity extends until at least 2042, assuming normal prosecution timelines.


4. Patentability and Strategic Implications

4.1. Infringement Risks

Given the patent's scope, infringing products would need to fall within the defined compounds or formulations. For generic manufacturers, steps must be taken to design around claims, either by modifying structures or method parameters.

4.2. Challenges and Oppositions

The patent could face challenges based on:

  • Prior art demonstrating obviousness.
  • Lack of inventive step if similar compounds exist.
  • Insufficient inventive contribution over prior known compounds.

4.3. Opportunities

The patent protects specific compound structures and therapeutic methods, potentially enabling exclusivity in the Mexican market, valuable for launching novel drugs or licensing partners.


5. Key Stakeholders and Competitive Positioning

Companies holding MX2022010214 can leverage its scope for market monopoly, R&D investments, and licensing negotiations. Conversely, competitors can analyze the claims to develop non-infringing alternatives or challenge validity.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s strength relies on the breadth of its claims and how distinctly it differentiates from prior art.
  • Precise claim drafting covering both compound structures and methods enhances enforceability.
  • The Mexican patent landscape remains active, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Strategic use of patent claims can reinforce market positioning amid intense competition.
  • Monitoring international patent filings and patent family statuses aids in understanding global and regional patent protection.

FAQs

Q1: What is the likely scope of patent MX2022010214?
A1: It probably covers specific chemical compounds with potential therapeutic applications, along with formulations and methods for treating particular diseases, as defined by its structural and functional claims.

Q2: How does this patent compare to global patent landscapes?
A2: This Mexican patent likely aligns with broader international patent families, sharing similar claims with patents filed in the US, Europe, or Asia, though geographic specificities may differ.

Q3: Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
A3: Yes, by designing around the specific claims—altering chemical structures or therapeutic methods—companies can mitigate infringement risks.

Q4: What is the significance of the patent’s claims for the pharmaceutical industry in Mexico?
A4: It provides exclusive rights that can secure market position, enable licensing revenue, and support R&D investments for its duration.

Q5: What challenges might this patent face?
A5: Challenges could stem from prior art or lack of inventive step if the claimed compounds or methods are obvious improvements over existing inventions, leading to potential invalidation.


References

  1. Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent MX2022010214 documentation.
  2. WIPO Patent Scope Database. Global patent family mappings.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent family data and prior art searches.
  4. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Similar compounds and method patents.

This comprehensive analysis assists industry stakeholders in making informed licensing, R&D, and legal decisions related to patent MX2022010214.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.