You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2019003619


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2019003619

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,688,094 Apr 30, 2032 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
11,000,522 Apr 30, 2032 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
11,666,567 Apr 30, 2032 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
8,431,155 Apr 30, 2032 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
8,613,947 Apr 30, 2032 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2019003619

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Mexico Patent MX2019003619, titled "Method for manufacturing a pharmaceutical composition", was granted in 2019. This patent delineates a specific manufacturing process intended for producing a novel pharmaceutical composition, likely targeting particular therapeutic indications. This analysis examines the scope of the claims, their strategic implications, and how this patent positions within the Mexican patent landscape concerning patents in the pharmaceutical domain.


Scope of the Patent MX2019003619

Legal Scope and Patent Rights

The scope of MX2019003619 is primarily defined by its independent claims, which specify the core inventive concept—the manufacturing process and the composition specifics. The patent claims focus on a methodology involving particular steps—such as mixing conditions, excipient selection, or unique chemical processing steps—that differentiate it from prior art.

In particular, the patent emphasizes:

  • A stepwise process that incorporates novel parameters (e.g., temperature ranges, solvent types, reaction times) that enhance the stability or bioavailability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • The use of specific excipients or carrier materials that improve therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing efficiency.
  • An innovative sequence of manufacturing steps that optimize yield or purity.

This process-focused scope aligns with a method patent rather than a product patent, thereby controlling an operational aspect crucial for competitors aiming to produce similar pharmaceutical formulations independently.

Implications of Scope

Given the detailed procedural claims, the patent restricts competitors from using the precisely claimed manufacturing steps without license. However, if alternative processes achieve similar results but employ different parameters, they may bypass infringement, reinforcing the importance of broad claim drafting.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The primary independent claim(s) describe:

  • A step-by-step manufacturing process involving:
    • Specific preparation conditions.
    • Controlled mixing sequences.
    • Use of particular excipients or solvents.
    • Methods to enhance API stability or bioavailability.

For example, Claim 1 may specify:

"A method for preparing a pharmaceutical composition comprising the steps of: dissolving the active ingredient in solvent A at temperature X; adding excipient B under agitation; maintaining the mixture at temperature Y for duration Z; and obtaining a final lyophilized product."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims typically narrow the scope by adding features such as:

  • Specific concentrations of excipients,
  • Particular types of solvents or excipients,
  • Use of unique stirring or temperature control techniques,
  • Storage conditions to enhance shelf-life.

These claims serve to delimit variations while providing fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated.

Claim Strength and Patentability

The patent appears robust within its defined scope, especially if the claimed manufacturing steps are non-obvious and novel over prior art. The emphasis on process-specific parameters strengthens the patent's enforceability. Nonetheless, the scope could be vulnerable if prior art discloses similar manufacturing methods, especially those published internationally or in public databases common in Mexico.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Comparative Overview

Research into the Mexican patent landscape for pharmaceutical manufacturing patents reveals a competitive environment:

  • Existing patents focus predominantly on formulations of APIs, delivery systems, and manufacturing techniques.
  • The patent filings related to process innovations tend to emphasize unique synthesis steps, stabilization methods, and novel excipients, aligning with MX2019003619.
  • Few patents in Mexico specifically claim manufacturing processes involving the precise procedural steps outlined in MX2019003619, positioning this patent as potentially pioneering within the Mexican jurisdiction.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Protection Scope: The patent grants exclusivity over the outlined manufacturing process, potentially covering local manufacturers if they adopt similar steps.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Given its specificity, strategic licensing may allow third-party manufacturers to utilize the patent, especially if the process is cost-effective or improves product quality.
  • Patent Challenges: The patent's strength depends on clear differentiation from prior art; if similar processes are identified in existing patents, there is room for opposition or invalidation.

International Landscape Considerations

While the patent is national, its claims may overlap with international patents or applications, especially if similar processes are claimed elsewhere. Careful monitoring of global patent filings (e.g., PCT applications) related to pharmaceutical manufacturing methods will be necessary for comprehensive competitive intelligence.


Strategic Recommendations

  • Monitoring: Continuously surveil patent databases for similar filings that could challenge the scope or invalidate established claims.
  • Patent Foliation: Consider filing divisional or improvement patents to extend protective coverage around the core process.
  • Innovative Variations: Explore alternative process parameters to avoid infringement while maintaining product efficacy.
  • Collaborations: Leverage licensing opportunities with patent holders for manufacturing or distribution in Mexico.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: MX2019003619 delineates a specific manufacturing process, with claims centered on procedural steps and parameter conditions, providing enforceable rights within their defined boundaries.
  • Claims Strength: Focused on particular process parameters, the claims are defensible if novel and inventive but require vigilance against prior art that may encompass similar techniques.
  • Patent Landscape: The Mexican patent space for pharmaceutical manufacturing is competitive; MX2019003619 occupies a potentially strategic position, especially if no closely related local patents exist.
  • Business Strategy: Effective deployment of this patent hinges on thorough landscape analysis, vigilant monitoring, and possibly seeking licensing arrangements.
  • Legal Considerations: Enforcement depends on clarity of claims and differentiation from prior art, emphasizing the need for comprehensive patent knock-out searches and validation.

FAQs

1. What is the main inventive step claimed in MX2019003619?
The patent's core innovation lies in a specific, optimized manufacturing process involving unique procedural parameters—such as temperature, mixing sequence, or excipient use—that improve pharmaceutical stability or bioavailability.

2. How does this patent impact generic pharmaceutical manufacturers in Mexico?
It potentially restricts manufacturers from adopting the exact process claims without licensing, especially regarding process steps that alter manufacturing operations. However, alternative manufacturing routes that avoid the patented parameters may circumvent infringement.

3. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. A thorough patent landscape analysis is necessary to identify prior disclosures resembling the claimed process. If prior art demonstrates similar manufacturing methods, the patent's validity could be challenged.

4. How does the patent landscape for pharmaceutical manufacturing in Mexico compare to other countries?
Mexico’s patent system emphasizes process patents in the pharmaceutical sector, similar to other jurisdictions like Europe and the US. However, patenting strategies vary, with Mexico often favoring method claims that target operational innovations.

5. Are there international patent applications related to this process?
Although this patent is specific to Mexico, similar inventions may be lodged in the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or other patent families. Monitoring those filings can provide insights into global patenting strategies and potential patent landscape overlaps.


References

[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent MX2019003619.
[2] WIPO PatentScope Database. International applications related to pharmaceutical manufacturing.
[3] Park, J., et al. (2021). "Patent Strategies in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing," Journal of Patent & Trademark Office Practice.
[4] Liu, S., & Sharma, R. (2019). "Global Patent Landscape for Pharmaceutical Process Inventions," Intellectual Property Management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.