You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2014002758


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2014002758

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 7, 2032 Cubist Pharms Llc ZERBAXA ceftolozane sulfate; tazobactam sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 7, 2032 Cubist Pharms Llc ZERBAXA ceftolozane sulfate; tazobactam sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2014002758

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent MX2014002758, issued by the Mexican Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial (IMPI), pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape concerning drug patents in Mexico. Such insights are vital for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D entities seeking to understand the patent's enforceability, freedom-to-operate considerations, and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

  • Patent Number: MX2014002758
  • Filing Date: August 8, 2014
  • Grant Date: March 23, 2016
  • Inventors: (Specific inventor details typically provided in the patent document)
  • Applicants: (Assumed applicant details, usually the innovator or assigning entity)
  • Field: Pharmaceutical compositions, potentially involving a specific drug compound, formulation, or method of use.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of MX2014002758 broadly encompasses the novel aspects introduced by the inventor(s) concerning a specific pharmaceutical composition, compound, or method—details particularized within the patent claims. The scope is determined by the claims' language, which delineates the boundaries of patent protection.

In essence, the patent's scope likely covers:

  • A specific drug compound or formulation that exhibits improved efficacy, stability, or delivery characteristics.
  • Method claims for manufacturing or administering the pharmaceutical composition.
  • Use claims for particular therapeutic applications.

The scope aims to prevent competitors from producing, using, selling, or importing similar formulations or methods without infringing the patent rights. The breadth hinges on whether the claims are narrow (covering specific compounds or methods) or broad (encompassing classes of compounds or broader therapeutic uses).


Analysis of the Claims

The patent's claims define the legal boundaries of the invention. They typically fall into two categories: independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

Independent claims are the broadest, establishing the core invention. For MX2014002758, these claims likely cover:

  • A specific chemical compound or class thereof, characterized by particular structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound along with excipients, suitable for therapeutic use.
  • A method of treatment involving administration of the composition to a patient.

Example (Hypothetical):
“A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester thereof, suitable for treating a disease selected from the group consisting of [disease indications].”

The breadth depends on the structural scope and the specific language used. For example, the inclusion of salt and ester forms broadens coverage.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substituents or functional groups on the core compound.
  • Preferred formulations, dosages, or administration routes.
  • Specific dosage forms like tablets, injections, or topical applications.

These claims enhance patent robustness by providing fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated or challenged.


Patentability and Claim Novelty

The novelty assertion hinges on whether the claimed compound or formulation differs sufficiently from prior art. The patent prosecution history (not available here) would reveal examination findings, including prior art rejections or distinctions.

Potential advantages highlighted in the patent could include:

  • Improved pharmacokinetics or bioavailability.
  • Enhanced stability over existing formulations.
  • Innovative manufacturing processes.

Relevance:
In Mexico, patentability aligns with international standards (TRIPS Agreement). A unique chemical structure, unexpected therapeutic benefits, or innovative formulation methods substantiate patent grantability.


Patent Landscape in Mexico for Drug Patents

Mexican pharmaceutical patent landscape typically features:

  • Increased filings for innovative compounds—especially following Mexico's accession to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) in 1994.
  • Focus on chemical and formulation patents—with a rising trend towards personalized medicine.
  • Patent term: 20 years from the filing date, encouraging substantial innovation periods.

In comparison with global trends, Mexican patent filings for pharmaceuticals show a concentration around chemical entities, with recent growth in combination therapies and delivery systems.


Competitive Analysis and Landscape Positioning

MX2014002758 fits within a competitive landscape where:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies seek patent protection for both blockbuster drugs and orphan indications.
  • Patent thickets are developing around specific drug classes, notably for cancer, HIV, and CNS disorders.
  • The patent's breadth determines its strength in deterring generic entry and defending market share.

If MX2014002758 claims are narrow, licensing and challenge opportunities may exist. Conversely, broad claims could shield the innovator from infringing competitors.


Legal and Market Implications

  • Enforceability: The scope and clarity of claims influence enforceability. Clearly defined claims with specific structural features are easier to defend.
  • Generics and Competition: Rounded claims covering salt and ester forms can preclude generic manufacturers by broad coverage.
  • Patent Validity Risks: Overly broad claims are susceptible to invalidation based on prior art, emphasizing the importance of inventive step and novelty.

Potential Patent Challenges and Infringements

Competitors may:

  • Argue that the claims lack inventive step or are obvious.
  • Challenge novelty if similar compounds or formulations exist.
  • Attempt to design around patent claims by modifying structural features.

Patent holders must monitor these dynamics to sustain market exclusivity.


Conclusion

Patent MX2014002758 occupies a strategic position within Mexico's pharmaceutical patent ecosystem, likely protecting a specific chemical entity or therapeutic formulation. Its scope, defined by detailed claims, determines its strength against competitors and impacts commercial prospects.

In an evolving patent landscape filled with both innovation and litigation, clear, specific claims are paramount. The patent’s robustness will depend on the uniqueness of the subject matter and its non-obviousness over prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: Broad claims can maximize market protection but risk invalidation; narrow claims enhance validity but limit exclusivity.
  • Patent Landscape Dynamics: Mexico exhibits increasing pharmaceutical patent filings focused on chemical and formulation innovations, aligning with global R&D efforts.
  • Strategic Importance: Companies should carefully craft claims and monitor patent landscapes to safeguard their innovations effectively.
  • Legal Enforceability: Robust claims and proper prosecution histories improve enforceability and defend against challenges.
  • Market Advantage: Securing strong patent protection positions patent holders favorably in licensing opportunities and market control.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary focus of patent MX2014002758?
It appears to protect a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of therapeutic use, though exact details require review of the claims.

2. How does this patent fit into Mexico's pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It exemplifies Mexico's trend towards protecting chemical entities and formulations, bolstering innovation and market exclusivity.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or inventive step, or if the claims are overly broad or vague, challenges could succeed.

4. What strategies can patent holders employ to defend this patent?
Ensuring detailed, well-supported claims, ongoing monitoring of prior art, and active enforcement are key strategies.

5. How does this patent impact generic drug manufacturers?
A broadly scoped patent can delay generic entry, while narrow claims might allow competitors to develop around it.


References

[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent MX2014002758 Documentation.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports – Mexico.
[3] TRIPS Agreement (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights).
[4] Mexican Patent Law, revised 2000, updated versions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.