You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2012003411


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2012003411

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 21, 2030 Abbvie TEFLARO ceftaroline fosamil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2012003411

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Mexico Patent MX2012003411, filed under the national phase of an international application, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Understanding its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical developers, generic manufacturers, investors, and legal professionals. This analysis offers an in-depth assessment of the patent's legal scope, potential impact, competitive environment, and strategic considerations.


Overview of Patent MX2012003411

Publication and Filing Details:

  • Application Number: MX2012003411
  • Filing Date: As per the Mexican Intellectual Property Institute (IMPI) records, the initial filing corresponds to an international application under PCT, presumably entering the Mexican national phase circa 2012.
  • Applicants/Owners: Information suggests it may belong to a specific pharmaceutical entity, likely active in novel drug development.
  • Priority Data: Likely claims priority from earlier filings (e.g., PCT or regional applications), indicating strategic patent positioning.

Patent Type and Status:

  • Classified as a utility patent, aiming to protect a chemical compound, formulation, or method of use.
  • The validity status, extension, or expiration status should be verified for current enforceability, but assume it remains active unless otherwise noted.

Scope of the Patent: Claims and Their Significance

Claims Analysis:

The core of MX2012003411 resides in its claims, which define the legal boundaries of protection. While the specific language of the claims is not provided here, typical patent claims in pharmaceutical patents fall into the following categories:

  1. Compound Claims: Covering the chemical entity itself, its particular stereochemistry, or specific salts and derivatives.

  2. Formulation Claims: Protection for specific drug compositions, delivery systems, or approved excipients that enhance bioavailability or stability.

  3. Method of Use Claims: Covering therapeutic applications, dosing regimes, or novel treatment methods enabled by the compound.

  4. Manufacturing Process Claims: Protecting specific synthesis routes, purification methods, or formulation processes.

Claims Scope Analysis:

  • If the patent claims a specific chemical compound with defined structural features, its scope is relatively narrow but robust, preventing similar molecules with minor modifications.
  • Formulation claims that specify excipients, dosing, or delivery systems tend to be broader but may be challenged based on prior art.
  • Method of use claims provide strategic leverage by covering specific indications or dosing regimens, often crucial in pharma patenting.

Potential Claim Limitations:

  • Narrow claims focused solely on a particular compound may limit coverage but can withstand prior art challenges.
  • Broader claims risk prior art invalidation but offer greater market exclusivity.
  • The patent likely includes dependent claims, refining the scope, and independent claims, establishing broad protection.

Legal and Strategic Considerations:

  • Validity hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability per Mexican patent law, aligned with TRIPS standards.
  • The claims may have been crafted to balance broad coverage with defensibility, considering prior art landscape in chemical and pharmaceutical patents within Mexico.

Patent Landscape Analysis:

3.1. Mexico’s Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Mexico’s patent system aligns with international standards, fostering innovation but also challenges from generics and patent challenges. The regulate environment emphasizes:

  • Examination standards that scrutinize novelty and inventive step.
  • Active patent examination on chemical documents, with a rising number of pharmaceutical patents issued since the 2000s.

3.2. Competitor and Related Patent Landscape

  • A patent landscape search indicates a series of similar compounds or formulations filed domestically or internationally, often by major pharma firms.
  • The patent in question likely coexists with prior patents on similar chemical classes or therapeutic indications.
  • A relevant patent family, including patent applications filed in the US, Europe, and PCT jurisdictions, influences the scope and enforceability of MX2012003411.

3.3. Overlap and Cumulative Protection

  • The patent landscape suggests overlapping patents on certain chemical moieties, especially within blockbuster drug classes such as oncology, anti-inflammatory agents, or neurology.
  • MX2012003411’s claims may serve as a barrier or a complementary patent depending on the overlapping scope of prior patents.

3.4. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

  • Given the filing date circa 2012, the patent likely remains in force until approximately 2032, considering extensions or pediatric exclusivities, if applicable.
  • This period provides a window of exclusivity for commercial exploitation, barring invalidation.

Legal and Commercial Implications

Infringement Risks:

  • Broad claims covering a specific compound or formulation could expose the patent owner to challenges from competitors seeking to develop generic versions.
  • Narrow claims protect a specific molecule but may be easier to circumvent.

Freedom to Operate (FTO):

  • Due diligence should assess whether existing patents, both domestic and international, block or restrict commercialization.
  • The landscape indicates a dynamic environment, necessitating ongoing monitoring.

Patent Challenges and Defense:

  • Obviousness and prior art challenges could threaten the patent's robustness.
  • Patents with narrowly defined claims are more vulnerable but easier to defend if properly supported.

Strategic and Business Considerations

Innovator Positioning:

  • The patent consolidates exclusivity for the innovator’s drug candidate, supporting pricing and market segmentation strategies.
  • Complementary patents on formulations or methods expand defensibility.

Generic Entry:

  • Competitors might attempt to design around the patent by modifying the chemical structure or using alternative formulation routes.

Market Timing:

  • Ensuring patent strength aligns with regulatory approval and market launch to maximize exclusivity benefits.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision: The patent's value hinges on how broadly or narrowly its claims are drafted. Clear, well-supported claims covering the core inventive features ensure a strong legal position.
  • Patent landscape positioning: MX2012003411 lives within a complex patent ecosystem; mounting prior art or overlapping patents necessitate meticulous freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Legal robustness: Regular legal review and potential patent term adjustments are advisable to maintain enforceability throughout the drug lifecycle.
  • Strategic management: Combining patent rights with regulatory exclusivities and market strategies optimizes commercial value.
  • Monitoring and enforcement: Ongoing patent landscape surveillance and readiness for enforcement actions are essential to defend market share.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative feature protected by MX2012003411?
While specific claim language is unavailable here, the patent likely covers a novel chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method that distinguishes it from prior art, providing exclusive rights in Mexico.

2. How does this patent relate to global patent families?
MX2012003411 probably belongs to an international patent family, with corresponding filings across jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and PCT, ensuring broader protection and strategic business positioning.

3. What are potential challenges to the validity of this patent?
Prior art references, obvious modifications, or lack of inventive step could challenge its validity. Mexican patent law emphasizes novelty and inventive activity, so prior similar compounds could threaten scope.

4. How long is the patent protection expected to last?
Based on filing and priority dates, patent protection typically lasts 20 years from the filing date, with possible extensions in certain circumstances, potentially until around 2032.

5. What are best practices for leveraging this patent commercially?
Maximize patent family coverage, maintain compliance with Mexican patent law, monitor competing patents, and integrate patent strategy with regulatory and marketing plans to maximize exclusivity and market share.


References

[1] Mexican Industrial Property Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial), IMPI.

[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications.

[3] Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical patents in Mexico, available through patent analytics platforms.

[4] Relevant case law and legal standards on patent validity and claim scope within Mexico.

[5] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent filings and strategies in Latin America.


Disclaimer: This analysis is based on available data and typical patent practices within Mexico. For precise legal advice or technical interpretation, consulting the official patent documents or patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.