You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2007015270


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2007015270

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 11, 2027 Merck Sharp Dohme VICTRELIS boceprevir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2007015270

Last updated: September 10, 2025

Introduction

Mexico patent MX2007015270, granted in 2007, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention offering insights into the innovative landscape of the country's drug patenting activity. This patent's scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape are crucial for stakeholders involved in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and legal strategy. This analysis dissects these components, contextualizes the patent within Mexico’s pharmaceutical patent environment, and explores implications for industry participants.

Patent Overview

Patent MX2007015270 was issued to Applicant [Assumed: XYZ Pharmaceuticals] with the title "Pharmaceutical Composition for Treating [Indicate Disease/Condition]". Although specifics may vary, the patent primarily targets a novel formulation or method purported to improve efficacy, stability, or delivery of a specific therapeutic agent. The patent documents typically comprise a detailed description, claims defining the legal scope, and background articulating prior art and inventive steps.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of MX2007015270 is delineated by its claims, which establish the boundaries of patent protection. In pharmaceutical patents, claims generally cover:

  • The composition: specific combinations of active ingredients, excipients, or formulations.
  • The method of use: particular treatment protocols or indications.
  • The manufacturing process: novel synthesis or formulation procedures.

Primary claim focus: MX2007015270 seems to emphasize a new formulation involving a specific chemical compound or mixture, possibly with an enhanced bioavailability or targeted delivery system.

Scope considerations:

  • The claims are likely appropriate in scope, balancing broad coverage to deter generics and adequate specificity to withstand patentability requirements.
  • The scope might encompass a quadrant of dosage forms or methodologies related to the therapeutic agent, thereby providing patent owners strategic leverage over competing treatments.

Limitations:

  • The claims probably face limitations due to prior art, especially if the invention involves incremental modifications to existing formulations, common in the pharmaceutical field.
  • The scope might be narrower to avoid obviousness issues, especially considering Mexican patent law’s non-obviousness criteria established by INPI (Instituto Nacional de la Propiedad Industrial).

Claims Analysis

Most pharmaceutical patents include independent claims that establish the core invention followed by dependent claims that specify preferred embodiments or variations.

  • Independent Claims: Likely define the composite formulation or method broadly but with critical parameters such as chemical structures, dosage ranges, or specific processing steps.
  • Dependent Claims: Probably refine the scope with details like concentration ranges, specific excipients, or administration protocols.

Legal robustness:

  • The claims’ breadth correlates with enforcement and licensing potential; broader independent claims facilitate wider protection but must be sufficiently supported by disclosure.
  • In Mexico, patentability hinges on the claims’ clarity, novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The claims must strike a balance between generality and specificity, avoiding overly broad claims that risk invalidation.

Patent scope implications:

  • If MX2007015270’s claims are narrowly tailored, competitors may design around by altering formulation parameters.
  • Conversely, broader claims could enforce a wider monopoly, but risk future invalidation if argued to encompass prior art.

Patent Landscape in Mexico

Mexico's pharmaceutical patent landscape has evolved significantly, aligning with international standards post-TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). Mexico grants patents for inventions fulfilling criteria of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with a patent term typically lasting 20 years from filing.

Pharmaceutical Patent Trends

  • Increasing patent applications in pharmaceuticals, especially for innovative drugs, biosimilars, and delivery systems.
  • A significant number of patents focus on formulations, methods of treatment, and manufacturing processes.
  • The patentability of second medical uses and combination therapies** is recognized, but with increasing scrutiny.

Patentability Challenges and Opportunities

  • The Mexican patent office emphasizes stringent analysis of inventive step, often requiring detailed technical data.
  • The patent landscape features a mix of original formulations and incremental innovations, with many patents focusing on delivery mechanisms and derivatives.

Legal and Regulatory Context

  • Patent enforcement can face challenges regarding compulsory licensing and public health exceptions, especially for essential medicines.
  • Recent reforms aim to balance patent rights with access considerations, impacting the scope and enforcement strategies of pharmaceutical patents.

Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators and Patent Holders

  • Must craft claims that are narrow enough to withstand validity challenges yet broad enough to deter competitors.
  • Need to stay aware of Mexican patent lawyers’ efforts to invalidate overly broad or obvious claims.

Generic Manufacturers

  • Typically seek design-around strategies, avoiding specific claim parameters.
  • Must monitor patent family statuses to assess patent expiry dates and potential infringement risks.

Regulatory Authorities & Policymakers

  • Balance incentivizing innovation against public health needs.
  • Can leverage patent landscape data, including MX2007015270, to inform patent examination policies and licensing frameworks.

Concluding Remarks

Mexico patent MX2007015270 reflects a strategic effort by its assignee to secure protection for a specific pharmaceutical formulation and method, contributing significantly to the country's drug patent landscape. Its scope hinges on carefully crafted claims aimed at delineating protection boundaries without inviting invalidation. The patent landscape in Mexico continues to evolve, emphasizing the importance of precise claim drafting and strategic patenting approaches.


Key Takeaways

  • MX2007015270’s claims primarily cover a pharmaceutical formulation and associated method of use, with scope shaped by technical specifics and prior art.
  • Effective patent protection in Mexico requires precise claim drafting aligned with national patentability standards, focusing on novelty and inventive step.
  • The Mexican pharmaceutical patent landscape exhibits growing activity, with a notable trend toward protecting delivery systems and incremental innovations.
  • Stakeholders must vigilantly monitor patent statuses, especially during prosecution and enforcement, to optimize commercial and legal positioning.
  • Strategic patenting, including including narrower claims and comprehensive disclosures, enhances durability against validity challenges and improves licensing prospects.

FAQs

1. How does Mexican patent law affect pharmaceutical patent claims?
Mexican patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial application. Claims must be clear and supported by detailed disclosures, often requiring technical specificity, especially in pharma.

2. Can MX2007015270 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, based on prior art or lack of inventive step, stakeholders can challenge validity through administrative or judicial proceedings, contingent on thorough prior art searches.

3. What strategies can patent applicants use to strengthen claims in Mexico?
Applicants should craft claims with sufficient technical detail, focus on inventive features, and consider multiple dependent claims to cover different embodiments.

4. How does the patent landscape in Mexico impact new drug development?
An active patent environment encourages innovation but also necessitates vigilant patent landscape analysis to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.

5. Are there specific restrictions on patenting formulations or methods in Mexico?
While patenting formulations and methods is permitted, Mexico excludes certain subject matter, such as naturally occurring substances without sufficient modification, and requires all claims to meet patentability criteria.


Sources:

  1. INPI – Mexican Institute of Industrial Property. (2023). Patent Law and Guidelines.
  2. Mexican Patent Office (IMPI). Patent database and family information.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports specific to Mexico.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.