You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Lithuania Patent: 2422789


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Lithuania Patent: 2422789

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 10, 2027 Abbvie KYBELLA deoxycholic acid
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 10, 2027 Abbvie KYBELLA deoxycholic acid
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 3, 2025 Abbvie KYBELLA deoxycholic acid
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 8, 2025 Abbvie KYBELLA deoxycholic acid
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Lithuania Patent LT2422789

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Lithuanian patent LT2422789 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical sector, specifically within the domain of drug formulations, compositions, or methods of use. As part of comprehensive patent landscape analysis, this review provides an in-depth examination of the scope, claims, and positioning of LT2422789 within the broader patent environment. Such insights are critical for pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals aiming to assess patent strengths, potential infringement risks, or opportunities for licensing and collaboration.


Overview of Patent LT2422789

According to available patent documentation, LT2422789 was granted in Lithuania to protect a specific pharmaceutical invention. While the precise title and detailed description offer granular technical details, the core inventive concept generally revolves around a novel formulation, composition, or method applicable to therapeutic treatments. Lithuanian patent filings like LT2422789 often reflect early-stage or regional validation, but given Lithuania's participation in the European patent system, similar patents may exist at the European or international levels.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of patent LT2422789 hinges on its claims. These claims define the legal boundary of protection and determine which products or methods infringe upon the patent.
To analyze the scope, it is essential to distinguish between independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent claims: Describe the fundamental invention broadly, encompassing the core novel features.
  • Dependent claims: Add specific limitations or particular embodiments, providing narrower protection that can be instrumental in defending the patent's validity.

Key elements influencing the scope include:

  • Claim language: Precise terminology such as "comprising," "consisting of," and "consisting essentially of" modulate breadth.
  • Subject matter: Whether the claims cover the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), a particular formulation, a method of manufacture, or a treatment method.

Claims Analysis

While the exact text of the claims is not provided here, typical claims in pharmaceutical patents like LT2422789 often fall into several categories:

1. Composition Claims:
Claims that protect specific formulations, such as a combination of APIs, excipients, or carriers. For example, a composition comprising an active compound with specific stabilizers or delivery agents.

2. Method of Use Claims:
Claims covering the therapeutic application of the substance, for instance, a method for treating a particular disease or condition using the composition.

3. Manufacturing Process Claims:
Claims that protect novel processes of producing the pharmaceutical formulation, emphasizing efficiency, purity, or stability.

4. Device or Delivery System Claims:
In some cases, patents include claims pertaining to novel delivery devices or controlled-release systems.

Strengths and Limitations:

  • If claims utilize broad language (e.g., "a pharmaceutical composition comprising at least one active ingredient..."), the scope remains wide, enhancing patent defensibility.
  • Conversely, overly narrow claims limit actionable protection but might reduce vulnerability to invalidation challenges.

Claim Clarity and Potential Overlaps:

  • Clear, unambiguous claim language increases enforceability.
  • Overlaps with existing patents or prior art could threaten validity, particularly if claims are too broad or not sufficiently inventive.

Patent Landscape for Related Technologies

Global & Regional Patent Trends:

The patent landscape for pharmaceutical inventions in Lithuania and across Europe reveals several trends:

  • European Patent Applications: Driven by the European Patent Convention, applicants often file similar inventions with the European Patent Office (EPO). It’s common to see family patents, which include equivalents in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Prior Art and Common Assignees: Major pharmaceutical firms and biotech companies frequently secure patents for similar formulations, leading to a dense patent thicket. For example, patents related to blockbuster drugs often have extensive families, complicating freedom-to-operate analyses.

  • Key Patent Families and Infringement Risks: Identifying patents with overlapping claims helps in assessing potential infringement or licensing opportunities. The patent landscape surrounding LT2422789 likely involves patents related to the same therapeutic class, chemical entities, or delivery systems.

Regional Patent Considerations:

Lithuania's patent system aligns with European standards, making European Patent (EP) filings essential for broader patent rights in contiguous European countries. The European Patent Office’s legal framework often influences the scope and robustness of national patents like LT2422789.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Validity & Enforcement: Validation of LT2422789 depends on ongoing novelty and inventive step assessments against prior art. Its enforceability in Lithuania depends on claim clarity, proper maintenance, and exploitation.

  • Infringement Risks: Competitors producing similar formulations or methods might infringe if their innovations fall within the scope of the granted claims. Conversely, patent holders could face challenges if claims are too broad or unsupported.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Detailed FTO analyses require mapping existing patents, including LT2422789, to avoid infringement. This involves comparing claims scope, claim language, and jurisdictional coverage.


Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Maintenance & Expansion: Patent holders should consider extending protection through European or international filings, possibly building a patent family or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

  • Challenging the Patent: If patent claims are overly broad or lack novelty, competitors might seek to invalidate the patent via prior art references or inventive step challenges.

  • Licensing & Collaborations: The patent’s scope informs licensing opportunities, particularly if the patent covers a widely used formulation or method in a lucrative therapeutic area.


Key Takeaways

  • LT2422789's scope, as defined by its claims, likely encompasses specific pharmaceutical formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes targeted at therapeutic applications.
  • The patent's validity and enforceability largely depend on the clarity, scope, and novelty of its claims relative to prior art within Lithuania and broader European markets.
  • The surrounding patent landscape reveals a densely populated environment with overlapping patents, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Strategic patent management, including broader European filings and vigilant enforcement, can maximize commercial advantage.
  • Potential licensees or competitors should carefully scrutinize the claims to avoid infringement risks or identify licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. How does LT2422789 compare in scope to European pharmaceutical patents?
LT2422789's scope is generally aligned with European standards, but European patents often provide broader protection if strategically drafted. Verification involves comparing specific claim language and equivalents.

2. Can the patent scope be challenged if it overlaps with existing patents?
Yes, invalidity challenges based on prior art, lack of novelty, or obviousness can contest the patent's scope, especially if claims are overly broad.

3. Is it possible to extend protection from Lithuania to other European countries?
Yes, by filing corresponding European patent applications or patent family extensions, patent holders can secure rights across multiple jurisdictions.

4. What are the key elements that determine the enforceability of LT2422789?
Clarity of claims, non-obviousness, novelty, proper maintenance, and absence of prior conflicting patents influence enforceability.

5. How can competitors legally develop similar drugs without infringing?
By designing around the patent claims—altering formulations, methods, or delivery systems to stay outside the scope defined by the patent.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent search databases.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports.
  3. Lithuanian State Patent Bureau. Patent documentation and legal standards.
  4. Patent claims analysis methodologies.
  5. Industry-specific patent filing trends and strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.