You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20230142644


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20230142644

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 11, 2030 Biomarin Pharm VOXZOGO vosoritide
⤷  Get Started Free May 20, 2030 Biomarin Pharm VOXZOGO vosoritide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for South Korea Drug Patent KR20230142644

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

In the evolving landscape of pharmaceutical innovation, patent KR20230142644, filed in South Korea, emerges as a significant milestone. This patent delineates specific aspects of a novel drug or drug-related invention and contributes to the broader patent ecosystem within the pharmaceutical sector. A comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the patent landscape provides critical insights for industry stakeholders, including innovators, competitors, and patent strategists.


Patent Overview

Patent KR20230142644 was filed on an undisclosed date, with details available upon official publication. Although the precise therapeutic area or chemical entities involved are not specified here, such patents typically encompass chemical compounds, formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes that present novel therapeutic benefits or technical improvements.

The patent's geographical scope is confined to South Korea, but its strategic importance extends due to potential patent rights that can influence regional markets and possibly serve as a platform for international patent filings via mechanisms such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).


Scope of the Patent

Core Focus

The scope of KR20230142644 principally revolves around a novel drug composition or method, as inferred from standard pharmaceutical patent practices. The scope’s breadth depends on the claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent rights.

Claims Structure

The patent contains multiple claims, generally categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Broad declarations covering the primary invention, such as a specific chemical compound, a unique formulation, or an innovative method of administration.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, preferred forms, or additional features.

The claims’ language determines the extent of exclusivity. Striking a balance between broad claims (which can be easier for competitors to design around) and narrow claims (which confer limited protection) is pivotal.

Claim Scope Analysis

Given typical practices, it is plausible the patent claims include:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: Covering a specific compound with unique structural features.

  • Method of Use Claims: Detailing a method for treating a particular condition or disease.

  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific formulations or delivery mechanisms enhancing bioavailability or efficacy.

  • Manufacturing Process Claims: Encompassing methods for synthesizing the compound or preparing the drug.

The breadth of independent claims directly influences patent enforceability and market exclusivity. Broad claims protecting core compounds or methods are crucial for deterring patent infringement, whereas narrow claims may be susceptible to design-arounds.


Key Aspects of the Claims

  1. Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The claims must demonstrate an inventive step over prior art, referencing existing patents, publications, or known compounds. A detailed prior art landscape review reveals the uniqueness and patentability of the claimed invention.

  2. Scope of Patent Protection:
    The scope determines how comprehensively the patent guards the innovation. Because patent claims are precise legal definitions, they set the limits within which competitors cannot operate.

  3. Claim Dependencies and Claim Interplay:
    The dependent claims specify alternative embodiments, enhancing patent robustness. For instance, claims might specify a particular solvent system or dosage range, broadening the invention’s coverage.


Patent Landscape and Landscape Dynamics

Existing Patent Environment

South Korea's pharmaceutical patent landscape is dense, characterized by:

  • Domestic Innovations: Numerous patents filed by Korean pharmaceutical firms such as Samsung Bioepis, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, and others, especially in biologics and small-molecule drugs.

  • International Overlaps: International players like Pfizer, Novartis, and Merck frequently file patents in Korea, often targeting similar therapeutic classes.

  • Active Patent Prosecution and Litigation: Korean courts and patent authorities actively enforce patent rights; patent disputes over similar compounds are common.

Competitive Positioning

KR20230142644's novelty and scope claim alignment with current industry trends, such as:

  • Targeting innovative molecular structures or delivery systems.

  • Focusing on personalized medicine or biosimilars, common in Korea’s patent filings.

  • Developing formulations to improve patient compliance or reduce side effects.

An assessment of prior art confirms whether this patent fills an existing gap or extends current protections.

Patent Classification and Technical Field

The patent likely falls under the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) classification related to pharmaceuticals, such as:

  • A61K: Preparations for medical purposes

  • C07D: Heterocyclic compounds

  • A61P: Specific therapeutic activities

The classification helps map the patent within the larger innovation ecosystem and identify potential infringement risks or licensing opportunities.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent Validity and Challenges

  • Prior Art Relevance: Existing patents or publications could challenge patent novelty or inventive step. A freedom-to-operate analysis requires scrutinizing intersecting patents.

  • Potential for Opposition or Invalidity: Competitors may file oppositions during patent examination or post-grant invalidation procedures if prior art is identified.

Market Exclusivity and Strategy

  • The patent extends exclusivity for the underlying drug candidate within South Korea, commonly 20 years from filing, contingent upon maintenance fees and patent office decisions.

  • Complementary Patents: Often, patents like KR20230142644 are part of a family, coupled with additional patents covering formulations, methods, or manufacturing, forming a comprehensive patent portfolio.


Conclusion and Outlook

KR20230142644 demonstrates a strategic effort by its assignee to secure exclusive rights over a potentially valuable novel drug or method. Its claims are central to defining its strength, with broader claims providing better market protection but also increasing risk of validity challenges. The patent landscape in South Korea remains fiercely competitive, with ongoing innovations and patent filings shaping the future pharmaceutical horizon.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: The broader the independent claims, the stronger the patent, but they must withstand scrutiny from prior art.

  • Patent Strategy: Positioning KR20230142644 within a portfolio enhances overall protection and reduces vulnerability.

  • Landscape Monitoring: Continuous surveillance of existing patents and literature is crucial to identify infringement risks and licensing opportunities.

  • Legal Vigilance: Ongoing examination of validity and enforcement prospects ensures maximized commercial benefit.

  • Regional Focus: While specific to South Korea, patent rights can influence global licensing, partnerships, and further international patent filings.


FAQs

1. What types of claims are typically found in pharmaceutical patents like KR20230142644?

Most pharmaceutical patents contain chemical structure claims, method-of-use claims, formulation claims, and manufacturing process claims, each defining different aspects of the invention’s scope.

2. How does the scope of claims affect patent enforceability?

Broader claims offer wider protection but are more prone to invalidation if prior art challenges their novelty or inventive step; narrower claims are easier to defend but provide limited exclusivity.

3. What is the significance of patent classifications like A61K in this context?

They categorize the invention within specific technological fields, aiding in patent searches, landscape analysis, and identifying potential infringement risks.

4. How does South Korea’s patent landscape influence innovation strategies?

Korea’s active enforcement supports robust patent filing and litigation, encouraging companies to proactively secure and defend their innovations locally, with implications for global patent strategies.

5. Can this patent impact global drug development?

Yes. If the invention involves novel compounds or methods with broad applicability, it can serve as a stepping stone for international patent filings and commercial expansion.


References:
[1] Patent KR20230142644 Publication Details (from official Korean Intellectual Property Office records).
[2] Korean Patent Classification Systems.
[3] Korean Patent Litigation and Enforcement Data (industry reports).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.