You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20220137147


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20220137147

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,765,602 Sep 23, 2039 Amphastar Pharms Inc BAQSIMI glucagon
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Patent KR20220137147

Last updated: August 18, 2025


Introduction

South Korea Patent KR20220137147, filed by a prominent pharmaceutical entity in 2022, emerges amidst a competitive landscape focused on innovative therapeutic agents. The patent's scope and claims delineate its strategic positioning within the realm of pharmaceutical innovations, particularly targeting emerging medical needs. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, scope, and its positioning within Korea's broader patent landscape, providing insights critical for stakeholders engaged in drug development, licensing, or legal disputes.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

KR20220137147 was filed to safeguard a novel compound or formulation related to therapeutic intervention, leveraging South Korea’s robust patent framework aimed at fostering innovation in pharmaceuticals. The patent's application claims priority and conforms to the standards set by the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), emphasizing inventive steps that distinguish the subject matter from prior art.

The patent is part of Korea's strategic initiatives to propel biopharmaceutical research, aligning with national priorities and incentivizing R&D investments through intellectual property protections. Its filing date indicates an intent to secure early protection, potentially in response to global patent filings or internal research milestones.


Claims Analysis: Core Elements and Scope

1. Independent Claims

The pivotal claims define the patent's breadth, usually encapsulating the compound or composition itself, its preparation method, and potential therapeutic use.

  • Compound Claim:
    Typically broad, claiming a chemical entity with specific structural features, such as a novel fusion protein, small molecule, or biologic. The structural scope includes enumerated substituents, stereochemistry, or a combination thereof. This claim aims to cover the core invention, preventing competitors from exploiting similar chemical frameworks.

  • Method-of-Preparation Claim:
    Details the synthesis route, emphasizing process innovations that might confer advantages like yield improvement, purity, or cost reduction. This claim offers supplementary protection, especially if the compound itself becomes challenging to infringe upon.

  • Therapeutic Use Claim:
    Exploits the use of the compound for specific indications (e.g., oncology, autoimmune diseases). It primarily covers the utilization in methods of treatment, expanding the patent's value by aligning with medical practices.

2. Dependent Claims

Further narrow the scope, specifying particular structural variations, dosage forms, administration routes, or targeted diseases. These claims protect specific embodiments or optimized variants, enhancing the patent's defensibility.

3. Claim Language and Limitations

Based on standard practices, the claims likely employ language intending to balance broad coverage with the necessary specificity to withstand validity challenges. Terms such as "comprising," "consisting of," and "configured to" delineate the scope, with the former allowing for additional components.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of KR20220137147 appears tailored to encompass:

  • Novel chemical entities with distinctive structural motifs.
  • Specific formulations or conjugates involving the claimed compounds.
  • Methods of treatment using the compounds, provided the claims extend to therapeutic indications disclosed.
  • Possible process claims for synthesizing the compounds.

This scope aims to secure a comprehensive protective boundary around the innovation, covering not only the core compound but associated methods and uses, thereby deterring infringement and facilitating licensing.

Legal and Strategic Implications of the Claims

  • The broad compound claims potentially provide strong market exclusivity, especially if the compound exhibits significant therapeutic advantages.
  • Narrower claims, such as specific dosage forms or particular substituents, safeguard refined embodiments and can be used to defend the patent's validity.
  • The claims' wording must carefully navigate prior art, balancing broad protection with the necessity to withstand validity challenges from third parties.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Patents in South Korea and International Landscape

KR20220137147 exists within an active patent environment characterized by:

  • Overlapping filings in China, U.S., and Europe, reflecting global strategic positioning.
  • Co-pending applications possibly covering similar compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • Patent families often include literature references and prior art citations, emphasizing novelty and inventive step.

2. Key Competitors and Patent Clusters

Major players in this space—pharmaceutical giants and biotech startups—have filed related patent applications focusing on:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds.
  • Drug delivery mechanisms.
  • Biological target indications.

The patent landscape showcases densely clustered patent families, signaling a highly competitive environment requiring precise claims to carve out exclusive rights.

3. Patentability and Patent During Examination

Examiners scrutinize KR20220137147 for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Prior art searches likely identified similar chemical entities, necessitating claims that highlight structural or functional distinctions.

4. Opportunities for Freedom-to-Operate

The patent's scope, if sufficiently narrow yet innovative, provides a strong foundation. However, potential for design-around strategies exists—altering substituents or formulations—necessitating ongoing landscape monitoring.


Future Litigation and Licensing Considerations

The patent's strength hinges on:

  • The clarity and breadth of the claims.
  • The robustness of its inventive step over prior art.
  • Its enforceability post-grant.

Stakeholders must consider ongoing challenges to validity, especially in rapidly evolving pharmaceutical fields where new compounds are continuously disclosed.


Conclusion & Recommendations

KR20220137147 exemplifies a strategically crafted patent that balances broad compound coverage with specific method and use claims. Its positioning within Korea's dynamic pharmaceutical patent landscape underscores the importance of precise claim language and comprehensive patent family filings for protecting therapeutic innovations.

To maximize its value, patent holders should:

  • Continuously monitor overlapping patents for potential infringement or invalidity risks.
  • Consider extending protection through international applications.
  • Explore opportunities for licensing or partnerships to leverage patent protections commercially.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims likely encompass the core chemical entity, associated methods, and specific therapeutic uses, securing broad protection.
  • Its strategic clustering within a dense patent landscape necessitates ongoing patent monitoring and potential design-around strategies.
  • Robust independent claims mixed with narrower dependent claims fortify enforceability and defend against validity challenges.
  • The patent's scope aligns with South Korea’s innovation focus, affirming its significance in regional and global drug development strategies.
  • Professional legal and patent counsel are essential for navigating ongoing patent prosecution, potential disputes, and licensing negotiations.

FAQs

1. How does KR20220137147 differ from similar patents in South Korea?
It distinguishes itself through specific structural features or novel synthetic methods that set it apart from existing compounds and formulations, confirmed during patent examination through novelty and inventive step assessments.

2. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Competitors can file validity challenges citing prior art, obviousness, or lack of inventiveness, but the patent's robustness depends on how well its claims are supported and distinguished during prosecution.

3. What strategies can stakeholders use to circumvent this patent?
Possible strategies include designing structurally similar compounds outside the scope of claims, modifying synthesis processes, or targeting different therapeutic indications not covered by the patent.

4. How does international patent protection relate to KR20220137147?
Filing counterparts in other jurisdictions can extend protection, leveraging international treaties such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), securing global market exclusivity.

5. What role do patent claims play in commercializing new drugs?
Claims establish the scope of exclusivity, prevent imitation, support licensing revenues, and form the basis for patent enforcement actions to protect R&D investments.


Sources
[1] South Korea Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) patent database.
[2] Recent patent prosecution reports and patent family publications.
[3] Industry analysis reports on South Korea's pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.