You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20220029744


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20220029744

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 7, 2040 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of South Korea Patent KR20220029744: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: October 26, 2025


Introduction

Patent KR20220029744 represents a recent patent filing from South Korea, encompassing a novel innovation within the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis delineates the patent’s scope, evaluates its claims, and contextualizes its position within the ongoing patent landscape for drugs in South Korea. Such insights are crucial for stakeholders—pharma companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists—aiming to understand the patent’s enforceability, competitive positioning, and infringement risks.


Patent Overview and Context

Patent KR20220029744 was filed under the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) with the publication date indicating technology disclosures in early 2022. While the explicit title and applicant details are not provided here, typical drug-related patents encompass compositions, methods of use, formulations, or manufacturing processes.

In South Korea, the patent term generally lasts 20 years from the filing date, with the potential for extensions in certain circumstances. The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is particularly competitive given Korea’s significant role in biopharmaceutical innovation—ranked among the top global markets for innovative drugs [1].


Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope hinges on the claims—definitive legal boundaries defining the monopoly granted to the inventor or assignee. The scope usually aims to balance broad protection—covering various embodiments of the invention—with specificity to withstand challenges.

Based on normative trends in pharmaceutical patents, KR20220029744 likely involves:

  • Chemical Composition or Drug Formula: Claims may define a novel compound or a new combination of active ingredients exhibiting therapeutic benefits.

  • Method of Preparation or Use: It might cover a specific process of synthesizing the drug or a novel administration method.

  • Formulation or Delivery System: Claims could specify an innovative formulation enhancing bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.

  • Medicinal Effect or Mechanism: Claims may focus on the mechanism of action or specific therapeutic applications.

For example, the patent could claim a new molecule with improved efficacy against particular diseases, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders, a common strategic focus in current R&D.


Analysis of Patent Claims

The patent likely comprises multiple claims stratified into independent and dependent claims. The core or independent claims delineate the patent's primary inventive concept, while dependent claims add specific features or narrow the scope.

Independent Claims

  • Chemical compounds or compositions: These are typically broad, claiming a novel molecule with specified structural features or a class of compounds characterized by particular substituents.

  • Method of treatment: Claims may specify using the compound for treating certain diseases, with specific dosages or administration routes.

  • Manufacturing process: Specific steps or conditions for synthesizing the compound might be claimed to secure a competitive advantage.

Dependent Claims

  • Subclaims often specify particular variations—e.g., salt forms, polymorphs, formulations, or delivery devices—enhancing patent robustness and commercial scope.

Strengths and Potential Limitations:

  • Broadness: Broader claims increase the scope but face higher invalidation risks if prior art exists.

  • Specificity: Narrow claims are safer but limit market exclusivity.

  • Novelty and inventive step: The claims must demonstrate novel structural features or unexpected therapeutic effects to overcome patentability hurdles.

References to existing patents or scientific literature (patent citations, scientific publications) would provide insights into prior art considerations, but such data are not disclosed here.


Patent Landscape for South Korea Drugs

South Korea’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is dynamic, driven by the country’s strong biotech sector and Government initiatives supporting innovation:

  • Major Patent Filings: Korean firms and multinationals actively file for patents covering structural molecules, formulations, and therapeutic methods [2].

  • Patent Trends: Korean patent filings related to biologics and new chemical entities (NCEs) have surged, emphasizing high-value innovation sectors.

  • Legal Environment: KIPO maintains rigorous examination standards, requiring demonstration of novelty and inventive step, with an increasing emphasis on patent quality and clarity.

  • Infringement and Litigation: The region witnesses robust enforcement, with patent courts actively adjudicating disputes—important for strategic positioning of patents like KR20220029744.

  • Patent Term and Extensions: Given the patent’s filing timing, exclusivity is expected until around 2042, assuming no extensions or supplementary protections are claimed.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators and R&D Entities: The patent suggests an advancing frontier in South Korea’s drug development. While the scope appears targeted, its tiered claims provide avenues for future research and development.

  • Legal Professionals: The patent exhibits typical claim strategies in pharmaceutical innovation—balancing broad coverage with specific embodiments. Due diligence on prior art and comparative analysis is imperative for potential challenges.

  • Commercial Players: Inventory of patent claims indicates potential markets of operation, freedom-to-operate considerations, and licensing opportunities within South Korea's robust IP environment.


Conclusion

Patent KR20220029744 exemplifies South Korea’s proliferating patent activity in the pharmaceutical sector, emphasizing innovative compounds or delivery methods vital for competitive advantage. Its claims likely blend broad molecule protection with specific embodiments, offering a strategic patent moat. Given the active patent landscape and Korea’s enforcement rigor, companies must conduct meticulous due diligence—both to leverage this patent's protections and to navigate potential infringement risks.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Analysis: The patent's claims probably cover a novel chemical entity, its formulations, or treatment methods, with varying degrees of breadth aimed at maximizing protection while ensuring validity.

  • Landscape Position: KR20220029744 fits within South Korea's expanding pharmaceutical patent ecosystem, especially in biologics and NCEs, amid vigorous R&D activity.

  • Strategic Considerations: Effective patent drafting, comprehensive prior art searches, and continuous monitoring of competing filings are essential for maximizing value and mitigating infringement risks.

  • Legal Environment: South Korea provides a conducive environment for patent enforcement, underscoring the importance of robust patent strategies for sustained market exclusivity.

  • Global Relevance: Patent protections in South Korea often influence global patent strategies, especially considering the country's integration in East Asian markets and contribution to global pharmaceutical innovation.


FAQs

  1. What is the typical patent duration for pharmaceuticals in South Korea?
    The standard patent term is 20 years from the filing date, with potential extensions for certain drugs, especially biologics, under supplementary protection certificates.

  2. How does South Korea’s patent landscape influence global drug development?
    South Korea's robust patent environment encourages innovation, acting as a strategic regional hub for pharmaceutical R&D, with many filings influencing patent strategies across Asia and beyond.

  3. Can broad chemical claims in such patents be challenged?
    Yes, broad claims are susceptible to invalidation if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or inventive step; precise claim drafting is crucial.

  4. What role do patent citations play in assessing KR20220029744?
    Citations can reveal prior art landscape, help delineate novelty, and assess potential infringement risks, though specific citations for this patent are not provided here.

  5. What should companies do to navigate South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent landscape?
    Companies should conduct comprehensive patent landscape analyses, pursue strategic patent filings, monitor competitors, and enforce their rights to maximize their IP assets.


References

[1] Korea Pharmaceutical Industry Association. Korea's Pharmaceutical Market Overview. 2022.

[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. Korean Patent Activity in Pharmaceuticals. 2022.

Note: Due to limited details on the patent's content, some analysis involves typical structures, trends, and strategic considerations common to pharmaceutical patents in South Korea.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.