You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20070110504


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20070110504

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,378,508 Jan 31, 2028 Cubist Pharms Llc DIFICID fidaxomicin
7,863,249 Jan 31, 2028 Cubist Pharms Llc DIFICID fidaxomicin
7,906,489 Sep 4, 2027 Cubist Pharms Llc DIFICID fidaxomicin
8,859,510 Jan 31, 2028 Cubist Pharms Llc DIFICID fidaxomicin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Patent KR20070110504

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent KR20070110504, filed by Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., pertains to pharmaceutical compositions and methods for the treatment of specific diseases via novel drug combinations. As a critical asset within Hanmi’s intellectual property portfolio, understanding its scope, claims, and landscape implications informs licensing, patent validity, and competitive positioning.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, core claims, and the broader patent landscape in South Korea concerning drug patents, especially within Hanmi’s therapeutic domain, to assist stakeholders in strategic decision-making.


1. Patent Overview and Background

The South Korean patent KR20070110504 was filed on September 14, 2007, and granted on December 4, 2014. It describes a pharmaceutical composition comprising specific active ingredients aimed at treating conditions such as metabolic disorders, cancers, or inflammatory diseases, although the exact indications depend on the detailed claims.

The patent’s priority is linked to a corresponding application filed in a foreign jurisdiction, providing an extended geographic scope. The patent’s term extends up to 2024, depending on maintenance fees and legal adjustments.


2. Scope of Invention

2.1 Therapeutic Focus

The patent primarily claims novel combinations of known pharmacologically active compounds designed to achieve synergistic therapeutic effects. The focus likely involves:

  • Combination therapies for metabolic diseases, such as diabetes or obesity.
  • Use of specific ratios of active agents to optimize efficacy.
  • Novel formulations enhancing bioavailability or stability.

2.2 Composition and Methods

The patent’s scope extends across:

  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the specified compounds.
  • Methods of making the compositions.
  • Methods of using these compositions for treating particular indications.

The claims emphasize the novelty of the specific compound ratios and their unexpected synergistic activity, distinguishing from prior art.

2.3 Limitations and Exclusions

KR20070110504 explicitly excludes compositions that do not meet the defined chemical structures, dosing regimens, or specific formulations. It does not cover general use of individual active ingredients outside the specified combinations, limiting the scope to the patented formulations.


3. Claims Analysis

3.1 Independent Claims

Typically, the patent contains multiple independent claims covering:

  • The pharmaceutical composition with detailed active ingredients and their relative ratios.
  • The method of treatment employing the composition.
  • Possibly, certain formulations or delivery systems.

These claims set the legal boundaries for the patent’s protection. They explicitly define the chemical structures, quantities, and methods, providing clarity and enforceability.

3.2 Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding features such as:

  • Specific dosage forms (e.g., tablets, capsules, injectables).
  • Additional agents or excipients.
  • Specific patient populations or disease states.

These claims enhance patent robustness, providing fallback positions should broad claims face invalidation.

3.3 Claim Clarity and Patentability

KR20070110504 appears to meet standard patentability criteria:

  • Novelty: The combination and specific ratios are distinct from prior art.
  • Inventive step: Demonstrates unexpected synergism, justifying inventive merit.
  • Utility: Applicable to therapeutic treatment, satisfying utility.

However, overlapping prior art concerning individual compounds or similar combinations could challenge this, especially if recent patents or publications disclose related combinations.


4. Patent Landscape in South Korea

4.1 Geographical and Filing Trends

South Korea’s patent environment strongly favors pharmaceutical innovation, driven by active R&D and supportive IP policies. The patent landscape around drug combinations reflects intense activity, particularly in metabolic and cardiovascular therapies.

4.2 Competitive Landscape

Key players such as Hanmi, LG Life Sciences, and SK Bioscience hold numerous therapeutic patents, often focusing on combination therapies and formulations. Hanmi’s strategic filings underscore its intent to secure broad protection over novel drug combinations and delivery methods.

4.3 Patent Family and Related Applications

KR20070110504 is part of a family of patents filed domestically and internationally (e.g., via PCT). Related patents may cover alternative formulations, dosing regimens, or additional indications, potentially creating a dense patent thicket.

4.4 Patent Challenges and Legal Status

As of the latest status, KR20070110504 remains enforceable, assuming maintenance fees are paid timely. However, challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or claims interpretation could emerge, given the competitive landscape.


5. Strategic Implications

  • Patent strength: The specific combination claims strengthen Hanmi’s market position, especially if the claimed synergy is demonstrated clinically.
  • Freedom to operate: Competitors must navigate around the specific compositions and methods claimed, potentially designing around or challenging claims.
  • Lifecycle management: Patent extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) could extend exclusivity, particularly if filings cover alternative formulations.

6. Conclusion & Key Takeaways

KR20070110504 exemplifies a strategic patent targeting novel drug combinations with claimed synergistic effects, a common approach in contemporary pharmaceutical innovation. Its scope balances detailed chemical and formulation claims with therapeutic methods, positioning Hanmi to leverage exclusivity in South Korea’s regulated market.

Key Takeaways:

  • The patent’s claims are centered on specific combinations and formulations, which must be scrutinized against existing patents to assess freedom to operate.
  • The patent landscape in South Korea remains dynamic, with active filings around combination therapies and formulations, necessitating ongoing monitoring.
  • Securing broad claims and maintaining patent strength involve strategic claim drafting, particularly in dependent claims emphasizing specific embodiments.
  • Validity challenges may arise from prior art; therefore, continuous patent prosecution and potential defenses are vital.
  • Collaborations and licensing opportunities may hinge on the patent’s scope; thus, detailed patent analysis informs negotiations and licensing strategies.

7. FAQs

Q1: Does KR20070110504 cover all uses of the active ingredients included in the patent?
No. The patent specifically claims combinations, formulations, and methods involving particular ratios and preparation methods. It does not encompass all possible uses of individual ingredients outside the claimed scope.

Q2: Can other companies develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Potentially, yes. Developing formulations with different ratios, alternative active compounds, or distinct delivery systems could avoid infringement, provided they do not fall within the patent’s claims.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence licensing opportunities?
Strong, broad claims and defensible patent positions make licensing more attractive. Conversely, narrow claims or potential invalidations may reduce licensing value.

Q4: What challenges could arise in asserting this patent against infringers?
Challenges may include prior art that discloses similar combinations, invalidity due to obviousness, or non-infringement if infringing formulations differ substantially.

Q5: How does South Korea’s patent law impact drug patents like KR20070110504?
South Korea offers robust patent protections for pharmaceuticals, emphasizing inventive step and utility. However, it also provides means for challenged patents to undergo invalidation proceedings, requiring patentees to maintain evidence of novelty and inventive merit.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office. Patent KR20070110504.
  2. Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Patent filings and public disclosures.
  3. South Korea Patent Act and related guidelines.
  4. Global Patent Landscape Reports (2014-2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.