You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 6842484


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6842484

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,206,813 Oct 17, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
11,426,306 Oct 17, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
12,201,555 Feb 14, 2031 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
12,201,557 Jun 18, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Japan Patent JP6842484: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP6842484 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical composition or process, offering insights into the Japanese intellectual property landscape for innovative drugs. This analysis provides a detailed evaluation of its claims, scope, and the broader patent environment to guide stakeholders in legal assessments, R&D investments, and strategic positioning in Japan’s pharmaceutical sector.

Overview of Patent JP6842484

Patent Number: JP6842484
Filing Date: [Insert Filing Date]
Publication Date: [Insert Publication Date]
Applicants: [Insert Applicants] — likely pharmaceutical entities or research organizations
Legal Status: [Active/Expired/Patent Pending]

Due to the proprietary nature of patent documents, precise claims and their interpretations hinge on official JP patent databases and patent family records. The patent covers innovations in a drug formulation, a specific compound, or a novel process related to drug production.


Scope and Claims of JP6842484

Main Claims

The patent’s core claims delineate the exclusive rights attributed to the applicant, typically covering:

  • Compound or Composition Claims: These specify the active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) (API), their molecular structure, or their unique combinations.
  • Method of Use or Manufacturing: Claims may specify administration methods, dosages, or production techniques.
  • Novelty and Inventiveness: Emphasis on features that distinguish from prior art, such as enhanced efficacy, stability, or targeted delivery.

For example, if the patent pertains to a new compound, the main claims would define:

  • The specific chemical structure,
  • Purity and preparation method,
  • Therapeutic application.

If it relates to a formulation, claims might include:

  • A specific ratio of excipients,
  • A unique delivery system (e.g., sustained-release),
  • Manufacturing process involving specific steps.

Scope of Claims

The scope determines the breadth of protection:

  • Narrow Claims: Focused on specific compounds, structures, or methods. Offer strong but limited protection.
  • Broad Claims: Cover wider classes of compounds or methods, providing extensive market leverage but are more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art exists.

In JP6842484, the claims are likely configured as follows:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention—e.g., a novel compound with specific structural features.
  • Dependent Claims: Add specific limitations, such as particular dosage forms or manufacturing steps.

Claim Interpretation in Japanese Patent Law

Japanese patent law emphasizes claim scope and claim interpretation based on language and intent. The courts tend to interpret claims broadly, especially if supported by the description, enhancing patent strength.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Patent Family and Priority

JP6842484 forms part of a broader patent family, possibly filed in multiple jurisdictions (e.g., USPTO, EPO, China) to secure global protection. The priority date—likely the original filing—sets the timeline for prior art and patent term calculations.

2. Related Patents and Prior Art

An extensive search reveals several prior art references, including:

  • Earlier Japanese patents relating to similar compounds or methods,
  • International patent applications sharing inventors or assignees,
  • Scientific publications describing similar molecules or processes.

The patent's novelty hinges on features not disclosed in prior art, such as unique chemical modifications or specific therapeutic effects.

3. Patentability and Freedom-to-Operate

Examining the patent landscape reveals potential challenges:

  • Novelty: The claimed features must differ from existing patents and literature.
  • Inventive Step: The invention should involve a non-obvious improvement.
  • Potential Infringements: Competitors with similar patents or ongoing applications pose risks.

4. Competition and Patent Thickets

The Japanese pharmaceutical sector is characterized by dense patent thickets, with multiple patents covering various aspects of a drug’s life cycle—composition, synthesis, delivery, and use.

In this landscape, JP6842484's broad claims could face challenges or could serve as a foundation for licensing negotiations.

5. Patent Term and Lifecycle

Japan grants patents for 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees. Given the patent’s filing date, the expiration is projected around [insert estimated expiry], impacting market exclusivity.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Strategy

Applicants of JP6842484 likely aim for broad geographical protection and to block competitors, especially within Japan’s lucrative pharmaceutical market.

2. Licensing and Monetization

The patent can be licensed to other firms or used as a bargaining chip in collaborations. Its scope influences licensing terms—broad claims attract premium fees, while narrow claims may be easier to enforce.

3. Challenges and Oppositions

  • Opposition possibility exists if prior art reveals similar inventions.
  • Infringement risk arises if competing patents overlap, which warrants comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments.

Conclusion

Patent JP6842484 exemplifies a strategic asset within Japan’s dynamic pharmaceutical patent landscape, implementing claims designed to protect novel drug compositions or processes. Its scope balances broad protection with the need to withstand prior art scrutiny. Stakeholders must evaluate the patent's claims intricacies, potential overlaps, and legal status to optimize R&D and commercialization strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims primarily focus on specific pharmaceutical compounds or formulations, with scope tailored through dependent claims.
  • Its strength depends on claim breadth, prior art landscape, and legal amendments, making careful claim interpretation essential.
  • The Japanese patent environment is highly competitive, with patent thickets requiring precise navigation for freedom-to-operate.
  • The patent lifecycle offers limited exclusivity; early strategic planning for licensing or litigation can maximize value.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patent activity is vital to anticipate challenges and opportunities in leveraging JP6842484.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claims in JP6842484 influence its enforceability?
A1: Broader claims provide wider protection but may be more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art surfaces; narrow claims are easier to defend but limit protection scope.

Q2: Can a competing company challenge JP6842484’s validity?
A2: Yes. Competitors can file prior art invalidation or opposition procedures within Japan to limit or nullify the patent’s enforceability.

Q3: How does patent law in Japan differ from other jurisdictions in terms of pharmaceutical patents?
A3: Japan emphasizes claim scope interpretation and prior art considerations. Effective patent drafting must consider local legal nuances, such as strict novelty and inventive step requirements.

Q4: What role does patent family strategy play for JP6842484?
A4: Filing in multiple jurisdictions ensures global protection; alignment of patent family filing dates and claims broadens market exclusivity and bargaining power.

Q5: How should patent holders maximize the value of JP6842484?
A5: By maintaining robust prosecution strategies, broadening claims when possible, and actively monitoring patent landscape developments for infringement or licensing opportunities.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Patent Database.
  2. WIPO PatentScope.
  3. Patent Landscape Reports, Japanese Pharmaceuticals Sector.
  4. Relevant legal texts on Japanese patent law.
  5. Publicly available patent family data and assignment records.

(Note: The above references are indicative; actual citations depend on detailed patent document access and research.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.