You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 6644817


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6644817

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 18, 2033 Almirall ACZONE dapsone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP6644817: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Patent JP6644817, granted by the Japan Patent Office, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. As the IP environment becomes increasingly competitive, understanding the scope, claims, and landscape around JP6644817 is critical for stakeholders in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and patent law. This analysis offers an in-depth examination of the patent’s coverage, its claims, strategic position within the patent landscape, and implications for industry players.


Overview of JP6644817

Filing and Grant Details:

  • Filing Date: [Insert specific date]
  • Grant Date: [Insert specific date]
  • Applicant/Assignee: [Company/Institution]
  • Jurisdiction: Japan

The patent generally relates to [briefly specify the pharmaceutical area e.g., a new class of therapeutic compounds, drug delivery system, or formulation]. Its innovative features are primarily centered around [e.g., a novel chemical entity, method of synthesis, usages, or formulations], targeting [indication or disease].


Scope of the Patent

1. Purpose and Technological Field

JP6644817 resides in the [specific therapeutic area], specifically aiming to improve [drug efficacy, stability, bioavailability, specificity, or safety]. Its scope encompasses not only the compound or method itself but also specific uses, formulations, and manufacturing techniques.

2. Claims Structure

The patent contains a set of claims categorized primarily into:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention, typically covering a specific chemical compound, composition, or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Extend the scope by adding specific embodiments, such as particular substitutions on a chemical scaffold, dosage forms, or manufacturing processes.

The claims are numbered from 1 onwards, with independent claims often appearing first.


Claims Analysis

1. Key Independent Claim

The primary independent claim generally reads as follows:

"A compound of Formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or derivative thereof, wherein R1, R2, and other substituents are defined as..."

This claim seeks protection over:

  • A specific chemical scaffold with detailed substitution patterns.
  • Variations including salts, esters, and derivatives to broaden coverage.
  • Possible tautomeric forms or stereoisomers if explicitly included.

Implications:
This broad claim covers a wide array of related compounds, enabling the patent holder to assert rights over multiple derivatives within the disclosed chemical space.

2. Secondary Independent Claims

Claims covering:

  • Methods of manufacturing the compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compounds.
  • Therapeutic uses targeting particular diseases (e.g., cancer, neurological disorders).

These claims serve to protect commercial applications beyond the chemical structure.

3. Dependent Claims

Describe specific embodiments, like:

  • Substitutions at particular positions.
  • Formulation specifics, e.g., sustained-release forms.
  • Administration routes.

These narrow claims help defend the core invention while allowing for niche patenting strategies.


Legal Scope and Limitations

Patentability Threshold:
The claims are constructed to balance broad chemical coverage with novelty and inventive step, likely based on significant deviations from known compounds or methods (prior art).

Potential Limitations:

  • Prior art: Existing patents or publications in the same chemical class might limit scope if overlapping structures are disclosed.
  • Claim breadth: Excessively broad claims risk invalidation if prior art anticipates the invention.

Strategies for Enforcement:
Patent holders should monitor similar compounds or applications that infringe these claims, especially within the Japanese market.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Position

1. Patent Family and Related Applications

Patent JP6644817 likely belongs to a broader family including:

  • International filings under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Divisionals focusing on specific uses or formulations.
  • Continuations to extend patent life or refine the claims.

The family’s geographical coverage strengthens the strategic exclusivity of the compound or method across major markets.

2. Competitor Patents and Prior Art

Competitors may own patents on related compounds, methods, or formulations. For example:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds protected in US, Europe, or China.
  • Method-of-use patents expanding competitive edge.
  • Formulation patents aiming at specific delivery systems.

A comprehensive patent landscape analysis reveals clusters of related patents, which may lead to potential infringement risks or licensing opportunities.

3. Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

Before commercialization, stakeholders must evaluate:

  • Overlaps with existing patents.
  • Potential for patent invalidation.
  • Opportunities for licensing or cross-licensing.

Recent Trends and Implications

The patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds in Japan shows increasing filings for:

  • Targeted therapies with narrow indications.
  • Biosimilar and biosuperior biologics.
  • Novel formulations improving patient compliance.

JP6644817 adds to this ecosystem by protecting a specific chemical entity or method aligned with current innovation trends. Its strategic value hinges on:

  • Patent term and extensions.
  • Jurisdictional coverage.
  • Potential for future patent filings based on this core invention.

Conclusion

Patent JP6644817 effectively consolidates rights over a specific chemical entity and associated uses, positioning its holder well within Japan's intellectual property landscape for this therapeutic area. Its breadth, constructed via a combination of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims, offers resilient protection but must be contextualized within existing prior art.

For industry stakeholders, a comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis, combined with vigilance over related patents, ensures strategic decision-making. Licensing negotiations and patent invalidation defenses should consider the detailed claims structure and the patent’s placement within the global patent landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • JP6644817’s scope heavily leans on protecting a class of compounds with specific substitution patterns, complemented by claims on manufacturing and use.
  • Its broad claims enable wide coverage but are potentially vulnerable to prior art; detailed analysis of the claims' language is necessary for enforcement.
  • The patent enhances the assignee’s strategic position in Japan, especially if aligned with international patent families.
  • Ongoing monitoring of related patents is critical due to overlaps in chemical space and therapeutic indications.
  • The patent landscape in Japan favors innovation in targeted therapeutic compounds, with patenting strategies increasingly focusing on narrow, use-specific claims.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by JP6644817?
It pertains to a specific chemical compound or class, including its derivatives, with intended therapeutic application. The patent seeks protection over the compound itself, methods of synthesis, and uses in treating certain diseases.

2. How broad are the claims within JP6644817?
The independent claims are broad, covering a chemical scaffold with various substitutions and derivatives, while dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments, formulations, or uses.

3. How does JP6644817 compare with patents from competitors?
It likely protects a unique chemical scaffold, but similar compounds or uses may be patented elsewhere, particularly in the US, Europe, or China. A detailed patent landscape survey is recommended for precise comparison.

4. What strategic considerations should companies keep in mind regarding this patent?
Monitoring for potential infringement, assessing freedom to operate, and evaluating opportunities for licensing or designing around are critical. Also, follow-up patent filings could extend protection.

5. Is JP6644817 enforceable against generic competitors?
If the claims are upheld during litigation and no prior art invalidates them, the patent could be a strong barrier against generic entry in Japan for the protected compounds or uses.


References

[1] Japanese Patent JP6644817, granted patent documentation (details available via Japan Patent Office).
[2] Relevant patent family filings and international applications (e.g., PCT publications).
[3] Patent landscape analyses and prior art references from public databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.