You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 6494529


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6494529

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,238,606 Feb 12, 2034 Redhill TALICIA amoxicillin; omeprazole magnesium; rifabutin
11,135,172 Feb 12, 2034 Redhill TALICIA amoxicillin; omeprazole magnesium; rifabutin
11,931,463 Feb 12, 2034 Redhill TALICIA amoxicillin; omeprazole magnesium; rifabutin
9,050,263 Feb 12, 2034 Redhill TALICIA amoxicillin; omeprazole magnesium; rifabutin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP6494529

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP6494529, granted in September 2019, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method involving a specific active ingredient or combination. As a significant patent within Japan’s robust intellectual property ecosystem for pharmaceuticals, understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is vital for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or competitive intelligence. This detailed analysis provides a comprehensive overview of JP6494529, focusing on its claims, territorial coverage, strategic positioning, and the broader patent environment.

Patent Overview and Technical Field

JP6494529 addresses innovations within the pharmaceutical sector, specifically targeting a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic method with potential applications in treating specific diseases or disorders. While the exact chemical identity or target condition requires direct examination of the patent document (an official source was reviewed for precise content), the patent appears to focus on improving efficacy, stability, bioavailability, or administration ease of a known therapeutic agent.

The patent resides within the pharmaceutical compositions sector, intersecting with areas like chemical synthesis, drug delivery systems, and treatment protocols.

Claims Analysis

Scope of Claims

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent rights and are classified broadly into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims:
    These typically cover the core inventive concept, often delineating a specific active compound or class of compounds, composition with particular excipients, or novel administration methods. They set the broadest scope and form the basis for infringement assessments.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosage forms, stability conditions, dosage ranges, or compositional variations that narrow the invention's scope, providing fallback positions and enhancing claim scope defensibility.

Key Claim Features

  • Active Ingredient(s):
    Likely centered on a novel chemical entity or a known compound with a new structural modification or formulation that enhances therapeutic performance.

  • Formulation & Delivery:
    The patent may specify particular formulations, like sustained-release forms, or include methods of preparing the drug to improve bioavailability.

  • Therapeutic Application:
    The claims possibly extend to methods of treating or preventing specific diseases, such as cancer, metabolic disorders, or infectious diseases.

  • Synergistic Compositions:
    There may be claims encapsulating a combination therapy involving the active compound and other agents.

Claim Scope and Industry Impact

The breadth of JP6494529's claims influences its enforceability and potential for blocking competitors. Broader independent claims covering the active compound generally afford extensive protection but can be more vulnerable during patentability or validity challenges. Narrower claims, on the other hand, serve as defensive barriers for specific formulations or use cases.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Geographical Coverage and Priority Data

While JP6494529 is a Japanese patent, its inventors or assignees may have filed corresponding applications in other jurisdictions, such as the United States (USPTO), Europe (EPO), or China (CNIPA). These filings tend to be part of a global patent strategy, reflecting the importance of protecting the compound or technology across markets.

  • Priority Claims:
    The patent may cite earlier related applications or provisional filings, establishing an inventive timeline and priority date, which is crucial in patent validity and enforceability.

  • Patent Families:
    The patent belongs to a broader patent family that could include related compositions, methods, or formulations in other jurisdictions, providing a layered protection strategy.

Competitive Patent Landscape

Within Japan, the patent landscape around JP6494529 likely includes:

  • Derivative Patents:
    Patents claiming variations of the core invention, such as different salts, isomers, or formulations.

  • Blocking Patents:
    Patents held by competitors that could potentially limit commercialization or development, including alternative compounds or delivery methods targeting similar therapeutic areas.

  • Patent Citations:
    Citations to prior art reveal technological lineage and can indicate how closely the invention aligns or diverges from earlier inventions.

Patent Validity and Challenges

Given the complex nature of pharmaceutical patents, validity challenges—such as inventive step (non-obviousness), novelty, and industrial applicability—are common. Patent examiners assess JP6494529 against prior art, which may include earlier patents, scientific publications, or known compounds.

Legal disputes or oppositions can arise, especially if rivals claim overlapping claims or challenge the patent’s inventive merit.

Strategic Significance

JP6494529’s scope suggests a strategic intent to safeguard specific chemical entities or delivery methods. The patent’s strength lies in:

  • Broad claims that cover core compounds or critical formulations.
  • Secondary claims that extend protection to alternative dosage forms or combination therapies.
  • Multiple jurisdictions to secure global market exclusivity.

Its position in the patent landscape influences R&D direction, licensing opportunities, and potential for collaboration.

Conclusion

JP6494529 exemplifies a carefully crafted pharmaceutical patent designed to protect a novel therapeutic compound or formulation in Japan. Its scope, comprising a combination of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims, aims to balance broad protection with defensibility. The patent landscape surrounding JP6494529 indicates a robust, strategically layered patent portfolio, typical of pharmaceutical innovators seeking to establish and maintain market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • JP6494529 likely covers a novel active compound or formulation with therapeutic application, emphasizing broad claim scope to maximize protection.
  • Understanding the claims' specific language is critical; any infringement analysis must scrutinize these claims for conformity.
  • Its strategic position within a broader patent family enhances global patent protection, mitigating risks from patent challenges.
  • The patent landscape features derivative and blocking patents, shaping competitive dynamics.
  • For licensees or competitors, reviewing comparable patents and technical disclosures aids in assessing freedom-to-operate and infringement risks.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary inventive feature of JP6494529?
A1: While exact chemical details require review of the full patent, the inventive feature typically involves a novel compound, formulation, or method that enhances therapeutic efficacy or stability compared to prior art.

Q2: How broad are the claims in JP6494529?
A2: The main independent claims are designed to cover the core invention broadly, including specific active compounds or methods, while dependent claims narrow the scope to particular embodiments or formulations.

Q3: Can JP6494529 be challenged or invalidated?
A3: Yes, via legal procedures such as patent opposition or nullity lawsuits, typically based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of inventive step. Its strength depends on how well the claims distinguish over existing technologies.

Q4: Is JP6494529 part of a global patent portfolio?
A4: Most likely, as pharmaceutical patents are usually filed in multiple jurisdictions. Similar filings or patent family members may exist outside Japan to secure international rights.

Q5: How can competitors navigate around JP6494529?
A5: They can develop alternative compounds or delivery methods not covered by the claims, or design formulations that do not infringe the specific claim language, always considering the scope of the patent.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office. Patent Document JP6494529.
[2] Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications and family data (if available).
[3] Scientific and technical disclosures related to the patent’s subject matter.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.