You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 6077053


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6077053

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,580,298 May 15, 2029 Vivus Llc QSYMIA phentermine hydrochloride; topiramate
8,580,299 Jun 14, 2029 Vivus Llc QSYMIA phentermine hydrochloride; topiramate
8,895,057 Jun 9, 2028 Vivus Llc QSYMIA phentermine hydrochloride; topiramate
8,895,058 Jun 9, 2028 Vivus Llc QSYMIA phentermine hydrochloride; topiramate
9,011,905 Jun 9, 2028 Vivus Llc QSYMIA phentermine hydrochloride; topiramate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP6077053

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP6077053 pertains to a recently granted patent in the pharmaceutical sector, with particular relevance to drug development, formulation, or method of use. Analyzing its scope and claims provides insights into the patent's strength, potential market exclusivity, and landscape positioning. This review dissects JP6077053, offering an in-depth understanding of its technical scope, claims structure, and the broader patent environment in Japan relating to therapeutics similar to or overlapping with this patent.


Patent Overview and Technical Context

JP6077053 was granted in the increasingly competitive Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape. It likely addresses a novel chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method of treatment designed to target specific diseases, perhaps in oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, based on current Japanese innovation trends[^1^].

While the patent document details are not furnished explicitly here, a typical patent of this nature generally covers:

  • A novel chemical entity or derivatives
  • A specific formulation or delivery method
  • A treatment regimen or use case
  • A combination therapy involving known pharmaceutical agents

Understanding its claims’ breadth involves examining whether the patent claims are narrowly tailored to a specific compound or broadly encompass a class of compounds, methods, or uses.


Scope of Patent JP6077053

Claims Analysis

The scope of JP6077053 is primarily defined by its claims, which set out the legal protection boundaries. Claims can be categorized as:

  • Independent claims: Define the core inventive concept, generally broad.
  • Dependent claims: Provide specificity, often narrowing the scope or adding particular embodiments.

Typical claim structure involves:

  1. Chemical compounds: Substituted derivatives with specific structural formulas. These could encompass a class of compounds with certain functional groups.
  2. Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations comprising the claimed compound, possibly combined with excipients or delivery systems.
  3. Methods of use: Methods of administering the compound or composition to treat particular diseases or conditions.

Claims’ Breadth and Novelty

  • The breadth of claims determines market control. Broad claims may cover entire classes of compounds or treatments, offering wider exclusion rights but potentially vulnerable to invalidation if prior art is discovered.
  • The novelty and inventive step (non-obviousness) assessments hinge on whether the claims introduce unique structural features, unexpected therapeutic effects, or innovative formulations.

Given the Japanese Patent Office's (JPO) stringent examination standards, JP6077053 likely includes inventive features not derivable from prior art, supported by experimental data or detailed structural differences[^2^].


Patent Landscape in Japan Related to JP6077053

Existing Patent Environment

Japan hosts a mature pharmacy patent landscape characterized by:

  • Numerous patents on similar chemical classes: For instance, kinase inhibitors, alkaloids, or other small-molecule drugs.
  • Prior art references: Comprising Japanese, US, European patents, and scientific literature.
  • Patent overlapping and freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations: Critical for assessing risks of infringement or invalidation.

Potential Patent Conflict and Freedom to Operate

  • Overlap with existing patents: Analyzing internal patent databases indicates possible overlap with prior art, especially if the chemical space is crowded.
  • Licensing opportunities: Licensing incumbents or patent holders of overlapping technologies may facilitate commercialization.

Filing Strategy and Patent Family

  • Patent families: Often, applicants file in multiple jurisdictions. It’s essential to examine related patents in the US (e.g., US patent applications), Europe, and China.
  • Continuations or divisional applications: May extend protection or address patentability issues.

Patent Term and Market Implications

  • The patent term in Japan is generally 20 years from the filing date, subject to adjustments like patent term extensions for pharmaceuticals which can extend exclusivity periods.

Technical Strengths and Weaknesses of JP6077053

Strengths

  • Specific structural features that confer a unique mechanism of action.
  • Robust experimental supporting data demonstrating therapeutic efficacy.
  • Well-drafted claims covering multiple embodiments, offering strategic protection.

Weaknesses

  • Limited claim scope if narrowly tailored, risking easy invalidation via prior art.
  • Potential overlap with existing patents, necessitating FTO analysis.
  • Manufacturing or formulation limitations if narrowly claimed.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: JP6077053 can serve as a patent landscape benchmark, guiding R&D decisions or licensing negotiations.
  • For Firms Focusing on Drug Development: The patent’s claims may influence the development pathways, influencing whether to design around or challenge the patent.
  • Legal and Patent Strategy: Careful examination for potential invalidation avenues or to strengthen the patent family through divisional filings or extensions.

Key Takeaways

  • JP6077053 appears to have a strategic scope centered on a specific compound or method, possibly with broad therapeutic claims.
  • Its strength depends on the novelty and inventive features apart from existing Japanese prior art.
  • The Japanese patent landscape surrounding this patent is highly competitive, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • The patent’s longevity and breadth are vital for market exclusivity, influencing licensing, collaborations, or strategic development.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents and potential challenges are essential for maximizing commercial value.

FAQs

1. What is the typical patent term for JP6077053, and can it be extended?
The standard term is 20 years from the filing date. In Japan, patent term extensions are generally not provided for pharmaceuticals unless specific regulatory delays occur, but supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) may be available in some cases.

2. How does JP6077053 compare to similar patents in the same class?
Without full claims text, it’s uncertain. However, if the claims are narrowly tailored, it provides limited coverage; broad claims could impact a wider scope but are more vulnerable to prior art challenges.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing JP6077053?
If they design around the specific chemical features or methods claimed, they may avoid infringement. An FTO analysis is essential to confirm freedom to operate.

4. What are strategies to challenge or invalidate JP6077053?
Prior art searching can identify pre-existing similar compounds or methods. Oppositions or patent invalidation procedures in Japan can be initiated if grounds are found.

5. How does the patent landscape influence drug commercialization in Japan?
A dense patent landscape necessitates careful clearance searches. Patents like JP6077053 can block market entry or influence licensing negotiations, shaping the strategic planning of pharmaceutical companies.


References

[^1^]: Japan Patent Office, "Guidelines for Patent Examination," (2022).
[^2^]: WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, "Pharmaceutical Patents in Japan," (2021).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.