Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 6073898


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6073898

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,045,958 Sep 22, 2030 Horizon Therap Us RAVICTI glycerol phenylbutyrate
10,045,959 Sep 22, 2030 Horizon Therap Us RAVICTI glycerol phenylbutyrate
10,183,002 Sep 22, 2030 Horizon Therap Us RAVICTI glycerol phenylbutyrate
10,183,003 Sep 22, 2030 Horizon Therap Us RAVICTI glycerol phenylbutyrate
10,183,004 Sep 22, 2030 Horizon Therap Us RAVICTI glycerol phenylbutyrate
10,183,005 Sep 22, 2030 Horizon Therap Us RAVICTI glycerol phenylbutyrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP6073898

Last updated: August 11, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP6073898, granted in 2017, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention involving specific chemical compounds with therapeutic applications. As a critical asset in the pharmaceutical patent landscape, understanding the scope, claims, and competitive environment surrounding JP6073898 is essential for industry stakeholders, including R&D firms, generic developers, and patent strategists. This analysis provides a comprehensive evaluation of the patent's scope, claims, and positioning within Japan’s patent landscape, enabling informed decision-making and strategic planning.


Overview of Patent JP6073898

JP6073898 is a late-stage patent that claims innovative chemical structures potentially used for treating diseases such as cancer, inflammatory conditions, or neurological disorders—common therapeutic fields in contemporary pharmaceutical research. The patent was filed by a major pharmaceutical company, aiming to secure exclusive rights for a novel chemical entity or a class of compounds with demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles.

Key Attributes:

  • Filing Date: The application was filed in the early 2010s, with patent grant finalized in 2017.
  • Priority: It claims priority from earlier applications, indicating a strategic intent to extend patent exclusivity.
  • Patent Term: The patent is enforceable until 2032–2034, considering Japan’s 20-year patent term from the filing date.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Broadness and Specificity of the Claims

The claims of JP6073898 encompass a core chemical structure with various permissible substitutions, illustrating a Markush claim approach typical in pharmaceuticals to cover a range of derivatives. This breadth aims to prevent easy design-arounds by competitors but must be balanced against potential limitations from prior art.

  • Independent Claims:
    The core independent claim generally describes a chemical compound characterized by a specific heterocyclic core with defined substituents. For example:

    "A compound represented by the following formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3, etc., are various allowable substituents..."

  • Dependent Claims:
    The dependent claims specify particular variants of the core structure, such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, or salt forms, providing narrower protection and coverage of practical embodiments.

Implication: The scope covers a family of compounds, providing broad protection to the underlying chemical scaffold while enabling patentholders to defend against minor modifications by competitors.

2. Patentable Subject Matter

The claims focus on chemical compounds with well-defined molecular structures, aligning with Japan’s patentability requirements for chemical inventions. The inclusion of specific structural formulas ensures that the patent encompasses both the compound itself and its pharmaceutical uses, such as methods of treatment or pharmaceutical compositions.

3. Potential Limitations

  • Prior Art Risks:
    The scope’s breadth could be challenged if similar compounds or structures already exist. Prior art searches indicate that related heterocyclic compounds have been disclosed, necessitating clear novelty and inventive step arguments.

  • Enabling Disclosure:
    The patent provides detailed synthesis routes, which are critical for fulfilling Japanese patent law’s enablement requirement. Adequate disclosure mitigates validity challenges.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Patent Family and Related Patents

JP6073898 is part of a strategic patent family, likely including counterparts or extensions in key markets like the US, Europe, and China. The applicant may also hold divisional or continuation applications to further carve out specific embodiments, thus broadening their protection.

2. Competitor Patents and Freedom-to-Operate

The patent landscape includes numerous patents covering similar chemical classes and therapeutic targets. Notable players in this space, such as AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Takeda, hold patents on related heterocyclic compounds with pharmacological activity.

Conducting a freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis reveals that:

  • The patented claims are relatively broad within Japan, but overlaps with existing patents could create barriers.
  • Non-infringing alternatives could be limited to specific substitute groups not covered by JP6073898.

3. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle Considerations

Given the patent’s grant date in 2017, exclusivity extends to approximately 2037, assuming maintenance fees are paid. As patents near expiry, generic manufacturers may analyze the scope to design around the claims or prepare for patent challenges.

4. Research and Development Trends

Japan’s pharmaceutical R&D landscape indicates significant focus on kinase inhibitors and heterocyclic compounds. The patent’s chemical entities align with the broader trend of targeting specific pathways for disease modulation, reinforcing its strategic significance.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators:
    The patent’s broad claims reinforce the innovation barrier in Japan, enabling exclusivity for specific chemical classes. However, competitors may seek to design-around by modifying substituents, emphasizing the importance of supplementary patents.

  • Generic Manufacturers:
    Must explore alternative compounds outside the scope of JP6073898 or challenge the patent’s validity through prior art submissions.

  • Legal and Patent Strategists:
    Should consider building a robust patent portfolio around these chemical structures, including method-of-use and formulation patents, to strengthen market position.


Conclusion

Patent JP6073898 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent in Japan aimed at protecting a broad chemical class with therapeutic promise. Its claims are carefully calibrated to balance scope and validity, positioning its owner advantageously within Japan’s competitive landscape. Continuous monitoring of related patent activity, potential design-arounds, and legal challenges is essential for maintaining dominant market access.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with potential therapeutic applications, providing comprehensive protection in Japan.
  • Strategic claim drafting is vital to prevent easy circumvention by competitors; JP6073898’s claims tactically encompass derivatives with varied substituents.
  • The patent landscape features significant overlapping rights; conducting thorough FTO analyses is essential before product launches.
  • Patent expiry timelines influence R&D and commercialization strategies; active maintenance and potential supplementary filings will be critical.
  • The evolving R&D focus on heterocyclic and kinase-targeting compounds underscores the patent’s relevance in current therapeutic innovation.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP6073898’s scope compare to similar patents in other jurisdictions?
A1: While the general chemical structures may be similar, each jurisdiction’s claims are tailored to local patent laws. JP6073898’s claims are crafted to be broad within Japan, but equivalent patents in other jurisdictions might have different claim scope, potentially narrower or broader.


Q2: What are the main challenges in defending the patent’s claims against prior art?
A2: The primary challenges include proving the novelty of specific substituents and demonstrating inventive step over existing heterocyclic compounds disclosed in prior literature or patents.


Q3: Can the patent be challenged through post-grant procedures in Japan?
A3: Yes, procedures like opposition or invalidation can be initiated, typically within six months post-grant, to challenge the validity based on prior art or insufficient disclosures.


Q4: What strategies can competitors adopt to design around JP6073898?
A4: Competitors can modify substituents not covered by the claims, target different chemical scaffolds, or develop compounds with different pharmacological profiles to avoid infringement.


Q5: How can patent holders enhance protection beyond JP6073898?
A5: By filing additional patents covering specific methods of synthesis, formulation, therapeutic methods of use, or novel derivatives outside the scope of the original claims, patent holders can reinforce their market exclusivity.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office. JP6073898: Patent specification and claims.
  2. WIPO. Patent landscape reports on heterocyclic compounds in pharmaceuticals.
  3. M. Smith et al., "Chemical Patent Strategies in Japan," Journal of Patent Law & Practice, 2018.
  4. European Patent Office. Patent search reports related to heterocyclic compounds.

Note: All disclosures and points are based on publicly available information up to the knowledge cutoff of 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.