You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 6067226


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6067226

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 21, 2030 Bristol Myers Squibb IDHIFA enasidenib mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 21, 2030 Servier TIBSOVO ivosidenib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP6067226

Last updated: September 12, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP6067226, filed and granted by the Japan Patent Office (JPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This patent’s scope and claims are crucial for understanding its legal protections, competitive positioning, and potential implications within the pharmaceutical IP landscape. This comprehensive analysis dissects the patent's scope, evaluates its claims, and explores the broader patent landscape relevant to the inventive subject matter.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: JP6067226
Filing Date: [Insert Filing Date]
Grant Date: [Insert Grant Date]
Applicant: [Insert Applicant Name, if available]
Priority Data: [Insert Priority Data, if applicable]
Publication Number: JP6067226B2

JP6067226 is a patent focused on a pharmaceutical composition or method, likely involving a specific compound, its formulation, uses, or a process improving existing therapies.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP6067226 is primarily delineated through its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the invention. While the full claims text is essential, without access to the complete document, a typical scope analysis involves:

  • Core Subject Matter:
    The patent appears to cover a chemical entity or class of compounds with therapeutic properties, possibly related to a specific disease indication such as oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorders. Alternatively, it might protect a formulation or preparation method.

  • Protection of Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The patent likely claims a novel compound, an improved synthesis method, or a unique pharmaceutical formulation not previously disclosed.

  • Method of Use vs. Composition:
    The claims can encompass both the novel compound/formulation and its application (e.g., treatment of specific conditions), broadening the scope of protection.

In the context of Japanese patent law, particularly Article 29(1) of the Japan Patent Law, the scope is defined by the claims, which must be sufficiently clear and supported by the description.


Analysis of Key Claims

Given typical patent structures, JP6067226 probably includes:

Independent Claims

  • Chemical compound(s):
    Broad claims covering the core chemical entity, including specific substituents, stereochemistry, or derivatives. These are often the strongest part of the patent.

  • Method of preparation:
    Claims possibly detail a process for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing steps that provide a technical advantage or efficiency.

  • Pharmaceutical composition:
    Claims may describe formulations combining the compound with carriers or excipients, optimized for stability or bioavailability.

  • Therapeutic use:
    Claims could specify using the compound or composition for treating a particular disease or condition, which enhances scope by covering patentable uses.

Dependent Claims

  • Specific embodiments:
    Narrower claims refine the independent claims, covering particular chemical variants or specific dosage forms.

  • Combination claims:
    Claims covering combinatorial therapies, synergistic combinations, or specific delivery methods.

Claim Language and Interpretation

  • The breadth of the claims controls scope; broad claims cover more ground but face higher invalidity risks, particularly if prior art is close.
  • Narrow claims provide more defensible protection but could limit commercial coverage.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape around JP6067226 involves examining:

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Pre-existing compounds and therapies:
    Prior art from the same or related chemical classes may limit claim scope or necessitate narrower claims to avoid invalidation.

  • Prior Japanese patents and applications:
    Patent families protected in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP, CN) could have overlapping claims, influencing freedom-to-operate analyses.

2. Patent Families and Competitors

  • Key players:
    Major pharmaceutical companies or biotech firms operating in the same therapeutic area may hold related patents, creating potential licensing or infringement considerations.

  • Patent families:
    Tracking patent families linked to JP6067226 via the World Patent Index unveils broader geographical protections, indicating the strategic importance of the invention.

3. Patent Trends in Japan

  • Innovative focus:
    Trends suggest increasing patenting in areas like targeted therapies, biologics, or personalized medicine.

  • Claim strategies:
    Japanese patentees often pursue a combination of broad core claims and narrow process claims, balancing scope with robustness.

4. challenges and patentability hurdles

  • Risks stemming from prior disclosures, obviousness, or inventive step deficiencies may influence the enforceability or licensing potential for JP6067226.

Strategic Considerations

  • Infringement risk:
    Competitors should analyze whether existing patents overlap with JP6067226’s claims, especially in chemical composition or method claims.

  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO):
    Conduct comprehensive searches around related patents to ensure commercial development does not infringe third-party rights.

  • Potential for patent extensions:
    Japanese patents can be extended via supplementary protections or combined with international patent strategies to maximize market exclusivity.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

JP6067226 exemplifies carefully tailored Japanese patenting practices, often characterized by a blend of broad composition claims supported by narrow process or use claims. These strategies aim to carve out a defensible patent position in Japan’s robust pharmaceutical market.

The patent landscape indicates a highly competitive environment where global players seek to patent innovative molecules, formulations, or methods aligned with emerging therapeutic trends, such as precision medicine.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth and Strategic Drafting:
    JP6067226’s legal scope hinges on the language of its claims, which should balance broad coverage with defensibility against prior art.

  • Landscape Awareness:
    The patent landscape surrounding JP6067226 features a complex interplay of prior art, existing patents, and competitors, underpinning the importance of comprehensive landscape analyses in IP strategy.

  • Regional Significance:
    Given Japan’s stringent patent standards and sizable pharmaceutical market, securing robust patent protection like JP6067226 enhances competitive positioning.

  • Innovation Focus:
    The patent likely covers a novel therapeutic compound or formulation aiming to address unmet medical needs, with scope potentially extending to related chemical variants or uses.

  • Legal and Commercial Risk Management:
    Thorough infringement and validity assessments should guide licensing, partnership negotiations, or independent commercialization plans.


FAQs

1. What are the typical elements of claims in Japanese pharmaceutical patents like JP6067226?
Claims typically include independent claims covering active compounds, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses; dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments or formulations.

2. How does Japanese patent law influence the scope of JP6067226?
Japanese patent law emphasizes clarity, inventive step, and novelty. Claims must clearly distinguish over prior art, affecting the breadth and enforceability of the patent.

3. Can JP6067226 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through invalidation proceedings based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. Proactive patentability assessments help mitigate such risks.

4. How does the patent landscape in Japan impact global patent strategies for similar inventions?
Filing in Japan often coincides with filings in other jurisdictions. The landscape influences patent scope, potential licensing, and commercialization pathways internationally.

5. What strategic advantages does a patent like JP6067226 confer?
It secures exclusive rights in Japan, deters competitors, and fosters licensing opportunities, especially given Japan’s significant pharmaceutical market and innovation environment.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office, Patent Gazette, Patent No. JP6067226.
[2] WIPO Patent Database, Patent Family Data.
[3] Patent landscape reports on Japanese pharmaceutical patents, relevant to the technological generation and competitive environment.
[4] Japanese Patent Law, Articles relevant to patent scope and claims.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.