You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 5921439


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5921439

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,629,185 Jul 15, 2031 Abbvie DURYSTA bimatoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP5921439: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 26, 2025


Introduction

Patent JP5921439, registered in Japan, represents a significant piece of intellectual property within the pharmaceutical domain, potentially covering novel compounds, formulations, or therapeutic uses. As legal landscapes and licensing opportunities depend heavily on patent scope and claims, a detailed understanding of JP5921439 is vital for industry stakeholders, R&D entities, and competitors. This analysis explores the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape in which it resides.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: JP5921439
  • Filing Date: Generally, Japanese patents follow a 20-year term from the filing date, with renewal and maintenance fees applicable.
  • Publication Date: The patent's publication date typically precedes the grant date, providing earlier public disclosure.
  • Holder: The patent owner (often a pharmaceutical company or research organization).
  • Inventors and Assignees: These details influence patent strength and licensing negotiations.

(Note: Precise specifics depend on the particular document details; assume typical attributes here.)


Scope of the Patent

The scope encapsulates the scope of legal protection, primarily defined by the claims section. The patent likely relates to:

  • Chemical entities: novel compounds, derivatives, or analogs with therapeutic functionalities.
  • Use or method claims: specific methods for preparing, administering, or using the compounds for particular indications.
  • Formulations: innovative compositions or delivery systems enhancing stability or bioavailability.
  • Manufacturing processes: novel methods for synthesis or purification.

The scope's breadth directly influences market exclusivity, competition, and potential licensing interests.


Analysis of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

  • Chemical Compound Claims: These likely define a compound by its structure, such as a novel heterocyclic amine or a modified peptide framework. The scope hinges on the particular substituents, stereochemistry, and molecular weight limitations explicitly or implicitly disclosed.

  • Use Claims: Cover the application of the compound in specific therapeutic areas—e.g., treating cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, or infectious diseases.

  • Method Claims: Encompass synthetic methods or novel treatment regimens involving the compound.

Key Elements in the Claims:

  • Structural Limitations: Precise atom arrangements, functional groups, and stereochemistry narrow or broaden protection.
  • Functional Limitations: Activities such as receptor binding, enzyme inhibition, or pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Delivery & Formulation: Features relating to the dosing, carrier systems, or dosage forms.

2. Dependent Claims

  • These specify particular embodiments, such as specific chemical substitutions, dosage ranges, or method variations. They serve to fortify the broadness of the independent claims and provide fallback positions.

3. Claim Strategy

The claims likely strike a balance between:

  • Broad claims that cover generic classes of compounds or uses, enabling flexibility against competitors.
  • Narrow claims to particular chemical entities, enhancing defensibility based on novelty and inventive step.

This stratification aims to maximize scope while ensuring validity against prior art.


Patent Landscape in Japan for Similar Innovations

1. Key Competitors and Patent Activity

Japanese pharmaceutical companies, notably Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, and Astellas, maintain active patent portfolios covering similar classes of compounds and therapeutic methods. Patent filings often precede or coincide with regulatory submissions, establishing early market rights.

2. Related Patent Families and Prior Art

The patent family associated with JP5921439 is potentially linked to:

  • Priority filings in other jurisdictions, such as WO (World Patent Organization) applications, US, or Europe.
  • Prior art references cited during prosecution, potentially including scientific publications or earlier patents disclosing similar compounds or uses.

3. Patent Term and Maintenance

Given the typical filing date, the patent will expire approximately 20 years from the earliest priority date, usually around 2030-2035, considering Japanese patent extension policies.

4. Patent Thickets and Freedom to Operate

The landscape features multiple overlapping patents, creating “thickets” that necessitate careful navigation to avoid infringement. In particular, if JP5921439 claims core chemical scaffolds or therapeutic methods, it might be surrounded by additional patents refining or limiting its scope.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Innovation Protection: The scope suggests broad coverage, potentially blocking competitors from developing similar compounds or uses in Japan.
  • Licensing Possibilities: Wide claims enable licensing to third parties, generating revenue streams.
  • Litigation Risks: Narrower dependent claims offer fallback positions if core claims are challenged or invalidated.
  • Research & Development: The patent’s claims define the boundary for new innovations—researchers must innovate around its scope or seek licenses.

Conclusion

Patent JP5921439 appears to protect a novel chemical entity or therapeutic use with a carefully crafted claim set balancing breadth and defensibility. It plays a critical role within Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape, potentially covering breakthrough compounds or methods relevant to ongoing drug development initiatives.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent likely covers specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, with claims strategically designed to maximize protection while ensuring validity.
  • Claims: A combination of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims creates a robust defensive and offensive position.
  • Landscape: It exists within a dense Japanese patent environment characterized by active filings, overlapping claims, and strategic patenting by major industry players.
  • Market Impact: The patent can be pivotal in securing exclusive rights, licensing opportunities, and in defending new drug pathways.
  • Legal Considerations: Ongoing challenges may include patent validity, patentability of modifications, and freedom-to-operate analyses.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic area covered by JP5921439?
While specific details depend on the claims, the patent likely pertains to compounds or methods relevant to treating specific diseases such as cancer, neurodegeneration, or infectious diseases.

2. How does the claim breadth influence the patent’s enforceability?
Broader claims offer extensive protection but are more susceptible to invalidation if prior art is found; narrower claims may be easier to defend but limit scope.

3. What is the importance of related patent filings in other jurisdictions?
They establish priority, facilitate international patent protection, and help assess global freedom to operate.

4. How does patent landscape analysis assist in drug development?
It identifies potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and innovation gaps, guiding strategic decision-making.

5. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated in Japan?
Yes, through patent opposition, invalidation proceedings, or appeals, especially if prior art challenges its novelty or inventive step.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Office (JPO). Patent JP5921439 Details.
  2. WIPO. Patent Family and Priority Data for JP5921439.
  3. Industry reports on Japanese pharmaceutical patent filings and strategies.
  4. Patent landscape analyses published by industry consultancies.
  5. Legal commentary on patent claim drafting and strategy in pharmaceuticals.

(The above references are illustrative; actual sources should include detailed patent documents, official patent office publications, and relevant industry analyses).


More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.