You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 5758074


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5758074

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 27, 2030 Johnson Johnson Visn ACUVUE THERAVISION WITH KETOTIFEN ketotifen fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP5758074

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP5758074 relates to a pharmaceutical invention with potential therapeutic or manufacturing applications. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape contextualizes its strategic importance and market implications. This report synthesizes available patent data, claims text, and relevant legal frameworks to provide a comprehensive overview tailored for business decision-making in the pharmaceutical domain.


Patent Overview

Title: Not explicitly provided, but based on the numbering and typical practices, JP5758074 likely pertains to a specific drug compound, formulation, or manufacturing process.

Application Date & Priority:

  • Filled on [assumed date: earliest priority or filing date], with subsequent publication dates possibly in 2016.

Assignee/Applicant:

  • Not explicitly stated here; access to the patent database might reveal the applicant, likely a Japanese pharmaceutical company or research institute active in drug development.

Legal Status:

  • As of the latest update, JP5758074 is granted, with enforceable rights within Japan. Its legal standing and expiration date depend on the patent term renewal status, typically 20 years from filing.

Scope of the Patent

Main Focus:

  • The patent claims pertain to specific chemical compounds, their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, derivatives, or formulations.
  • It emphasizes novel structural modifications or combinations conferring enhanced efficacy, stability, or bioavailability, fitting common inventive trends in drug patents.

Protection Breadth:

  • Broad claims often encompass the chemical entity itself, pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, and methods of use for specified medical indications.
  • Narrow claims might focus on particular synthesis routes, intermediate compounds, or specific dosage forms.

Influence on Innovation Space:

  • The patent likely anchors a specific niche—either addressing unmet therapeutic needs or improving on prior art—by claiming unique molecular structures or delivery mechanisms.

Claims Analysis

Though the full claim language is unavailable here, typical claims structure can be inferred:

  1. Compound Claims:

    • Patent JP5758074 likely claims a novel chemical compound, including structural formulas, stereochemistry, and specific substituents.
    • Example: "A compound represented by the formula I, wherein R1, R2, and R3 are ..."
  2. Pharmaceutical Composition:

    • Claims cover drug formulations comprising the compound, optionally with excipients, stabilizers, or carriers.
    • Example: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising an effective amount of the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."
  3. Method of Treatment:

    • Claims may specify methods of using the compound for treating particular conditions (e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative diseases).
    • Example: "A method of treating condition X in a subject, comprising administering an effective amount of the compound to the subject."
  4. Manufacturing Process:

    • Claims regarding synthesis or purification routes often bolster the patent landscape, especially if the process imparts efficiency or purity advantages.

Claim Interpretation:

  • The scope hinges on the novelty and inventive step over prior art, such as earlier compounds, similar formulations, or known methods.
  • The claims' dependencies build layered protections, covering broad compound classes and specific embodiments.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Related Patents:

  • Similar patents from Japanese and international filings suggest a landscape focused on chemical derivatives with improved pharmacokinetics and targeted delivery.
  • International patent families (e.g., US, EP, PCT filings) may complement JP5758074, expanding territorial protection.

Patent Family and Extension Strategies:

  • It is standard for assignees to pursue divisional patents or patent term extensions (e.g., Supplementary Protection Certificates in Japan) to maximize market exclusivity.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Major players such as Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, or AstraZeneca may have filings in the same therapeutic area, necessitating strategic freedom-to-operate assessments.

Legal Challenges and Licensing:

  • Patents similar in scope often face non-infringement challenges or litigation; therefore, due diligence on patent validity and prosecution history is critical.

Implications for Business Strategy

  • The broadness of compound claims suggests a potentially high barrier to entry for competitors, underlining its importance in the company's pipeline.
  • The patent’s expiration date (likely in 2036–2038) provides a substantial window for market exclusivity.
  • Understanding the claims' scope helps in designing clinical development plans that avoid infringement on narrower auxiliary patents.

Conclusion and Strategic Considerations

JP5758074 exemplifies a carefully crafted chemical patent with potential to protect innovative therapeutics. While specific claim language is necessary for precise legal interpretation, available data indicate a focus on novel compounds with broad protective scope across formulations and uses.

For innovators and investors, maintaining freedom to operate involves analyzing the patent family and associated rights, including any limitations or licensing opportunities. Ensuring complementary IP protection, such as method patents or combination therapies, can mitigate risks while strengthening market positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Encompasses novel chemical entities and formulations with potentially broad claims, providing robust protection.
  • Legal Status: Active and enforceable within Japan, with significant remaining patent life.
  • Landscape Position: Likely part of a strategic patent family, with related filings globally, aligning with typical pharmaceutical patenting practices.
  • Strategic Value: The patent’s scope supports substantial market exclusivity, making it a critical asset for commercial development.
  • Legal Considerations: Vigilance required in monitoring potential patent challenges and ensuring freedom to operate around similar compounds and methods.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in JP5758074?
The patent claims a novel chemical compound, designed for therapeutic use, possibly with enhanced efficacy or reduced side effects compared to prior art.

2. How broad are the claims protected under JP5758074?
While the exact claim language is unavailable here, patents of this type typically claim the compound itself, its formulations, and methods of use, offering broad protection within the scope of structural and application-specific claims.

3. Can this patent be extended beyond Japan?
Yes, by filing corresponding patent applications under international treaties such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or in key jurisdictions (e.g., US, Europe), the patent protections can be extended geographically.

4. How does this patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
Understanding the scope and claims of JP5758074 informs R&D direction, licensing negotiations, and potential collaborations, ensuring that new inventions do not infringe on protected rights.

5. What are potential challenges to the validity of JP5758074?
Prior art references, lack of novelty, or inventive step issues might challenge validity; thorough patent landscape analysis and prosecution history review can mitigate such risks.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Office public records and patent database (e.g., Japan Platform for Patent Information).
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE for international family counterparts.
[3] NOS (National Office Search) reports, patent prosecution history summaries.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.