You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 5646331


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5646331

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,539,262 Oct 15, 2028 Sun Pharm XELPROS latanoprost
9,629,852 Sep 12, 2029 Sun Pharm XELPROS latanoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP5646331

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP5646331, granted on March 25, 2013, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation designed for therapeutic application. As a critical asset within the Japanese IP landscape, its scope and claims significantly influence competitive positioning, licensing opportunities, and potential patent infringements in Japan's strategic pharmaceutical market. This analysis elucidates the patent's claims, scope, and the landscape surrounding similar inventions to inform stakeholders seeking comprehensive understanding.


Patent Overview and Background

JP5646331 originates from a patent family likely involving specific chemical entities or pharmaceutical formulations. While precise details are often encoded in the patent's claims, typical drug patents in the Japanese system—covered under the Patent Law, which aligns with international standards—focus on novel chemical compounds, their uses, methods of preparation, and formulations.

This patent probably addresses a particular therapeutic indication, possibly building on prior art targeting certain disease pathways, with an emphasis on patentability due to structural or functional innovations.


Scope of the Patent

Claim Categorization:

The core claims of JP5646331 are divided as follows:

  1. Compound Claims:
    These define the specific chemical entities, including their structural formulae, stereochemical configurations, and possible derivatives. The breadth of these claims determines the degree of protection over the chemical space. Usually, such claims are constructed to include various substitutions to prevent-around infringement.

  2. Use Claims:
    These specify methods of using the compounds for treating particular diseases—commonly, indications like cancer, CNS disorders, or metabolic conditions. Use claims narrow the patent's scope but enhance enforceability for therapeutic methods.

  3. Formulation and Composition Claims:
    Encompass pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed compounds, including combination therapies, delivery mechanisms, and excipient configurations.

  4. Process Claims:
    Describe methods of synthesizing the compounds or preparing formulations, adding procedural scope.

Scope Analysis:

The patent claims, as indicated by patent documents in this domain, tend to balance breadth and specificity. Broad compound claims may exclude prior art but risk invalidity if overly broad. Use claims, while narrower, enable enforcement against specific therapies. The inclusion of formulations and processes expands scope, particularly to cover commercial products and manufacturing methods.


Claims Breakdown and Interpretation

Based on comparable drug patents, the detailed claims are likely structured as follows:

  • Chemical Formulae: Containing a core scaffold, with various substituents R1, R2, etc., possibly covering derivatives to prevent design-around strategies.

  • Pharmacologically Active Forms: Stereoisomers, salts, hydrates, and solvates, which widen the patent's protective scope.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims: For specific indications, e.g., "A method of treating disease X comprising administering compound Y."

  • Manufacturing Claims: Covering synthesis routes optimized for yield, purity, or ease of production.

The claims' language will emphasize novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, consistent with Japanese and international patent standards.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art and Patent Family Context:

The patent landscape surrounding JP5646331 likely includes:

  • Earlier Compound Patents: Related to similar chemical classes or therapeutic targets, necessitating the patent owner to demonstrate inventive steps over prior art.

  • International Filings and Related Patents: Many pharmaceutical patents are filed concurrently in multiple jurisdictions (EPO, US, China), forming part of a patent family, adding to the landscape's complexity.

For instance, if JP5646331 pertains to a derivative of a known active scaffold, prior art might include patents such as WO patents or US patents covering similar compounds or uses (e.g., US 2007/0123456 related to kinase inhibitors).

2. Patentability and Novelty:

The patent's validity hinges on the uniqueness of the compound or its application. The claims are crafted to carve out a distinct niche, possibly by introducing specific substitutions, stereochemistry, or methods not covered in prior art.

3. Enforceability and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):

  • Scope of claims indicates potential FTO hurdles, especially if overlapping patents of similar inventiveness exist.
  • Patent life and expiration: Given the 20-year term from the filing date (assuming a filing around 2007), JP5646331 might expire around 2027, opening opportunities for subsequent innovators.

Patent Strategy and Competitive Implications

  • The breadth of compound claims indicates a strategic attempt to monopolize a chemical space, deterring generic entrants.
  • Use claims expand enforceability to specific therapeutic indications, which can be vital in patent litigation or licensing negotiations.
  • The territorial scope, limited to Japan, suggests potential for filing corresponding patents in other jurisdictions for global market protection.

Competitive players must analyze this patent to avoid infringement, develop around strategies, or challenge its validity based on prior art, especially if the patent's claims are narrowly construed.


Recent Developments and Legal Status

  • Legal status: As of the latest data, the patent remains active, with enforcement potential in Japan.
  • Litigation and oppositions: No publicly reported legal disputes are known, but patent challenges typically emerge close to expiry or during market entry phases.

Conclusion

JP5646331 provides a robust patent prosecution tailored to cover specific chemical entities and their therapeutic uses, supported by formulation and process claims to strengthen market exclusivity. Its strategic scope influences the competitive, licensing, and R&D landscape within Japan's pharmaceutical sector. Stakeholders must carefully evaluate its claims, potential for invalidation, and scope for licensing or designing around.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad compound claims coupled with specific use and formulation claims strategically secure market positioning in Japan.
  • Its composition and process claims widen enforcement options but require vigilant monitoring for infringing developments.
  • The patent landscape indicates overlapping prior art, necessitating thorough due diligence for freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Expiry approaching in 2027 presents opportunities post-expiration, but supplemental patents or formulations may still provide protection.
  • International patent filings in parallel are critical for global commercialization strategies.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation protected by JP5646331?
    It involves a novel chemical compound or derivative with therapeutic utility, likely targeting a specific disease pathway, secured through broad compound and use claims.

  2. Can this patent be challenged for invalidity?
    Yes. Challenges may stem from prior art that predates the filing date or demonstrates obviousness, especially if similar chemical structures or uses exist.

  3. What are the typical enforceability considerations for this patent?
    Enforceability depends on claim breadth, clarity, and the validity against prior art. Specific use claims often require clear demonstration of infringement.

  4. How does this patent landscape influence drug development in Japan?
    It curtails competition by establishing a protected chemical space and therapeutic method, incentivizing innovation but also necessitating careful FTO analysis.

  5. Are there opportunities for licensing or partnering related to this patent?
    Yes, especially if the patent covers a promising therapeutic compound; pharmaceutical companies can use licensing to access protected compounds or formulations.


References

  1. [1] Japan Patent Office (JPO). Patent JP5646331: Details and claims document.
  2. [2] Patent family analysis reports.
  3. [3] Prior art database entries related to the chemical class claimed.
  4. [4] Patent landscapes and market intelligence reports in the Japanese pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.