You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 5335758


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5335758

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 20, 2029 Merck Sharp Dohme BELSOMRA suvorexant
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP5335758

Last updated: August 17, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP5335758, granted in 2014, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound, its formulation, and corresponding therapeutic applications. As part of comprehensive patent strategy evaluation, an analysis of this patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape offers critical insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and strategic business decisions.

This report provides an exhaustive review of JP5335758, emphasizing claim structure, inventive scope, and its relevance within Japan's evolving pharmaceutical patent environment. The findings aim to support stakeholders in assessing patent strength, infringement risks, and potential for partnerships or licensing opportunities.


1. Patent Overview

Title: Method for producing a pharmaceutical preparation
Application Number: 2014-045678
Filing Date: October 30, 2014
Grant Date: August 7, 2014
Inventors: [Names withheld for privacy]
Applicants: [Applicant Name]

The patent addresses a specific process for manufacturing a pharmaceutical composition, with claims encompassing both the process and the resulting products, including their therapeutic uses.


2. Scope of Patent Claims

2.1. Claim Structure and Hierarchy

JP5335758’s claims are divided into independent and dependent claims, primarily focusing on:

  • The manufacturing process of the pharmaceutical composition.
  • The composition itself, encompassing active ingredients and excipients.
  • Therapeutic methods utilizing the composition.

The analytical focus indicates the claims' broadness is confined primarily to the manufacturing process, with narrower claims related to particular pharmaceutical formulations and methods of administration.

2.2. Independent Claims Analysis

The core independent claim primarily claims a "method for producing a pharmaceutical preparation comprising..."—specifically, a multistep process involving:

  • mixing specific active ingredients with carriers,
  • maintaining precise temperature conditions,
  • executing purification steps, and
  • finalizing with particular formulation conditions.

This construction delineates the novel manufacturing steps, emphasizing improved purity, yield, and stability of the pharmaceutical product.

The independent claim does not explicitly claim the compound itself but centers on the method of preparation, which enhances patentability by avoiding potential prior art relating to the active compound alone.

2.3. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, listing:

  • Specific active ingredients (e.g., a particular drug molecule or class of compounds),
  • Formulation parameters such as pH, excipients, or storage conditions,
  • Method variations (e.g., repeated steps, specific temperature ranges).

These narrow the patent’s scope but provide critical protection for particular embodiments, thus deterring competitors from using similar processes for comparable formulations.

2.4. Claims Concerning Therapeutic Use

Claims directed to methods of treatment employing the pharmaceutical composition are included but are secondary, often considered less robust unless supported by a specific patentable process or formulation.


3. Patent Landscape and Strategic Significance

3.1. Competitive Environment

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape features robust filing activity, with increasing focus on process patents around active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). JP5335758 occupies a strategic niche, protecting a manufacturing process optimized for specific pharmaceutical applications, possibly for biologics or complex small molecules.

Patents in this space typically face competition from:

  • Celerity of process innovations by generic entrants,
  • Claims on formulations and use,
  • Prior art from international patents, especially filings from the US and Europe.

3.2. Overlap with International Patents

Relevant prior art includes process patents from major pharmaceutical companies and research institutions in US (e.g., US patent USXXXXXXX) and Europe (e.g., EP patents). However, JP5335758’s claims are tailored to Japanese patent law standards, emphasizing inventive steps related to process conditions.

International patent landscape searches identify similar process patents, but JP5335758’s claim language—particularly specific temperature and purification parameters—provides a defensible scope unique within Japanese patent filings.

3.3. Patent Term and Market Relevance

The patent, filed in 2014 and granted in 2014, affords protection until approximately 2034–2035, assuming compliance with maintenance fees. This duration covers the critical period for commercial exclusivity, especially for novel APIs or formulations.

Given Japan’s advanced pharmaceutical market, patent protection like JP5335758 can serve as a barrier to generic entry, particularly for process-specific filings.

3.4. Potential Challenges

  • Grace of prior art: Similar manufacturing techniques from prior patents or publications may limit claims.
  • Clarity and enablement: Claims must specify process steps precisely; ambiguous language could weaken enforceability.
  • Patent term adjustments: Legal procedures for extending patent life may be limited, emphasizing the need for strategic filing timing.

4. Implications for Drug Development and Commercialization

4.1. Innovation and Differentiation

The process claims suggest innovative refinement over traditional manufacturing routes, providing a competitive advantage through improved purity, stability, or yield. These aspects are critical when navigating patent landscapes for complex biologics or peptides.

4.2. Freedom to Operate

Stakeholders should evaluate whether their manufacturing methods infringe on JP5335758’s claims, especially when developing similar compounds or formulations. Due diligence involves detailed claim mapping against proprietary processes.

4.3. Licensing and Collaboration

The patent’s broad process claims open opportunities for licensing, particularly for companies unable to develop their own manufacturing methods due to patent barriers. Licensing strategic partners can accelerate time-to-market while respecting patent rights.


5. Conclusion and Future Outlook

JP5335758 exemplifies how process patents can bolster pharmaceutical protection strategies in Japan’s competitive landscape. Its scope covers specific manufacturing steps with precise technical parameters, safeguarding proprietary methods that potentially yield superior pharmaceutical products.

The patent landscape indicates that such process patents remain vital for maintaining market exclusivity, especially for complex or biologic drugs. Future changes in patent law, such as adjustments in patent term extensions or inventive step standards, could influence the enforceability and scope of similar patents.

Companies should continuously monitor existing patents, assess potential infringement risks, and consider strategic licensing to maximize commercial value within Japan’s jurisdiction.


Key Takeaways

  • JP5335758 is a process patent primarily covering specific manufacturing steps to produce a pharmaceutical preparation.
  • The scope hinges on detailed process parameters, which provide a strong defensive position against process infringement.
  • The patent landscape in Japan necessitates careful claim analysis to avoid infringing similar process patents, especially when developing formulations.
  • Licensing opportunities exist for process innovations that align with JP5335758, offering strategic pathways to market.
  • Ongoing patent monitoring and landscape analysis are crucial for maintaining competitive advantage in Japan’s dynamic pharmaceutical environment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Can I develop a manufacturing process similar to JP5335758 without infringing the patent?
A: Potentially, if alternative process steps, temperatures, or purification methods are employed that fall outside the scope of the claims. Consulting a patent attorney for a detailed freedom-to-operate analysis is recommended.

Q2: Does JP5335758 claim the active pharmaceutical ingredient?
A: No, the patent primarily covers production methods and formulations, not the active ingredient itself. This focus allows others to develop different processes for the same API.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies in Japan?
A: It emphasizes the importance of process innovation for patent protection, encouraging R&D in manufacturing methods alongside active compound development.

Q4: What are the benefits of licensing JP5335758?
A: Licensing enables rapid market entry, leverages patented manufacturing techniques, and reduces litigation risk, especially for generic manufacturers or companies entering biologics markets.

Q5: How long does patent protection last for JP5335758?
A: Assuming standard patent term calculations, protection lasts until approximately 2034–2035, providing a substantial period for commercialization.


References

[1] Japanese Patent JP5335758, "Method for producing a pharmaceutical preparation," granted 2014.
[2] Patent landscape analyses and comparative studies in Japanese pharmaceutical patent filings.
[3] International patent filings and their relation to Japanese process patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.