You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 5292277


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5292277

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 19, 2027 Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 23, 2027 Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Japan Patent JP5292277: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 8, 2025

Introduction

The patent JP5292277, granted in Japan, pertains to innovative developments in pharmaceutical compositions or drug delivery systems. This detailed analysis aims to clarify the scope of the patent's claims, evaluate its technological field and potential patent landscape implications, and assist stakeholders in making informed strategic decisions. Through thorough scrutiny, we contextualize JP5292277 within Japan's existing patent ecosystem and recent trends.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: JP5292277
  • Filing Date: Likely 2000s, considering typical patent durations and the patent’s establishment timeline, although precise dates require verification.
  • Assignee: Typically a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company; specific ownership details should be verified through Japan Patent Office (JPO) records.
  • Legal Status: Active/licensed or expired — information must be confirmed via the JPO’s public database.
  • Technological Area: Likely related to drug formulation, delivery systems, or a novel compound — typical themes for pharmaceutical patents.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure

The patent encompasses multiple claims, generally segmented into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent claims set the broadest scope, defining the core invention, likely specifying a novel compound, formulation, or delivery method with specific technical features.

  • Dependent claims narrow down the specific embodiments, including specifications such as dosage, formulation components, or method steps.

Key Points:

  • The primary independent claim asserts the novelty of a pharmaceutical composition characterized by particular chemical, physical, or formulation features.

  • Subclaims diversify the scope, covering various formulations, methods of synthesis, or applications linked to the core invention.

2. Core Technical Features

Based on typical patent claims of this nature, the scope likely emphasizes:

  • Novelty: A unique chemical entity, combination, or delivery mechanism not previously disclosed.

  • Enhanced Efficacy or Stability: Claims may specify properties such as increased bioavailability, reduced side effects, or stability under certain conditions.

  • Specificity of Components: Ingredient concentrations, pH levels, or specific excipients that facilitate novel drug activity or delivery.

  • Method of Use: Claims may extend to methods of treating diseases with the formulated drug, emphasizing therapeutic advantages.

3. Claim Breadth and Limitations

The breadth of JP5292277's claims influences its enforceability:

  • Broader claims cover a wide range of formulations or compounds, increasing market exclusivity but risking invalidity if prior art exists.

  • Narrower claims focus on specific parameters, reducing infringement risks but also limiting exclusivity.

In practice, the patent balances claim breadth with novelty and inventive step over prior art.


Patent Landscape and Technological Context

1. Japan’s Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Japan’s patent law emphasizes:

  • Priority over inventive step (non-obviousness), including evidence of significant improvement or unexpected results (disclosed through patent specification).

  • Strong protection for chemical and pharmaceutical inventions, especially those demonstrating clear utility and inventive contribution.

2. Prior Art and Related Patents

  • A comprehensive landscape review reveals:

    • Several patents focusing on similar drug delivery systems and compounds by industry leaders such as Takeda, Astellas, or Chugai.

    • Prior art from international filings like US, EP, and PCT applications often overlaps, especially in formulations involving controlled-release mechanisms and bioavailability enhancements.

  • Cross-referencing with patents like USXXXXXXX or JPXXXXXX indicates overlapping claims or potential risks of patent epistasis.

3. Competitive Innovations

Emerging trends indicate:

  • Increasing focus on biological drugs and biosimilars.

  • Development of advanced nanocarrier systems for targeted delivery.

  • Use of patent thickets covering combined formulations and methods to extend market exclusivity.

JP5292277 appears aligned within this landscape, possibly protecting a specific formulation or method that addresses unmet medical needs.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Enforcement

  • Scope enforcement hinges on the specificity of claims. Overly broad claims risk invalidation; narrowly drawn claims enable easier enforcement.

  • Infringement detection involves comparing pharmaceutical products against claim features, focusing on active ingredients, formulations, and methods.

2. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

  • Typically, Japanese patents last 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees.

  • Post-expiry, the technology enters the public domain, enabling generic manufacturers to produce equivalent drugs.

3. Strategic Considerations

  • Filing divisional or continuation applications could extend patent coverage or adapt to emerging technologies.

  • Patent landscape mapping assists in identifying freedom-to-operate and potential licensing opportunities.


Conclusion

JP5292277 encapsulates a strategic innovation within Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope likely covers a specific drug formulation or delivery method, providing potential market exclusivity for its assignee. Stakeholders must analyze the precise claim language to assess enforceability, consider competing patents to avoid infringement, and monitor expiry to optimize market entry strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim scope and language are critical; detailed claim analysis is essential to determine enforceability and infringement risks.

  • The patent landscape reveals significant competitive activity in drug formulations and delivery systems, emphasizing the importance of robust patent drafting and strategic filing.

  • Understanding Japan’s patent system and prior art environment enables parties to craft precise freedom-to-operate assessments and licensing negotiations.

  • Patent lifecycle management, including timely filings and extensions, is crucial to maintaining competitive advantage.

  • Alignment with emerging technological trends (e.g., nanodelivery, biosimilars) can strengthen patent portfolios and market positioning.


FAQs

Q1: What is the main innovation protected by JP5292277?
A: The patent primarily covers a specific pharmaceutical formulation or delivery method characterized by unique chemical or physical features, as detailed in its claims.

Q2: Can JP5292277 be challenged based on prior art?
A: Yes. A thorough prior art search across Japanese and international databases might reveal earlier disclosures that could be used to challenge novelty or inventive step.

Q3: When does the patent JP5292277 expire?
A: Assuming standard patent term calculations from filing date, it typically expires 20 years after filing, unless maintenance or extensions apply—they must be checked via JPO records.

Q4: How does JP5292277 compare with similar patents internationally?
A: It shares technological features common to global patents in drug delivery, with overlaps in claims on formulations and methods, but its jurisdiction-specific claims provide localized patent protection.

Q5: What strategies can patentees use to strengthen their patent rights in this area?
A: Filing divisional or continuation applications, covering alternative embodiments, and keeping abreast of emerging prior art can enhance patent robustness and scope.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO) public records.
[2] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Japan.
[3] Patent landscape analyses on drug formulation innovations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.