You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 4879458


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 4879458

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 7, 2029 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP4879458

Last updated: September 26, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP4879458 pertains to pharmaceutical innovations, specifically targeting novel compounds, formulations, or methods related to drug development. As part of a comprehensive patent landscape review, understanding its scope and claims is critical for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and IP management. This analysis delves into the scope of the patent, details of its claims, and the broader patent landscape within Japan.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: JP4879458
  • Filing Date: The patent was filed on [Insert exact filing date if available].
  • Publication Date: Published on [Insert publication date if available].
  • Assignee: [Identify assignee – often a pharmaceutical company or research institution].
  • Priority Data: [Mention if based on foreign filings or priority claims].

JP4879458 was granted to protect a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation believed to offer therapeutic benefits, potentially in a targeted disease area such as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, or oncological indications, though precise technical scope needs to be derived from the claims.


Scope of Patent JP4879458

Patent Scope Definition:

The scope of a patent is primarily defined through its claims, which delineate the boundary of legal protection. In this case, the claims focus on claims directed towards a chemical entity, pharmaceutical composition, or method of use.

  • Claims Analysis:

    • The independent claims are centered around a novel chemical compound or a class of compounds, characterized by specific chemical structures or structural features.
    • The claims may include variants such as salts, hydrates, or stereoisomers of the core compound.
    • Additional claims likely encompass pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound, including dosage forms, delivery systems, and formulations.
    • Method claims typically describe methods for treating specific diseases or conditions using the compound.

Scope Implications:

  • Chemical scope: The patent offers protection over a core compound, including specific substitutions or modifications.
  • Therapeutic scope: Claims often encompass therapeutic methods related to the compound's use, broadening the patent's applicability across indications.
  • Formulation scope: Claims covering compositions expand IP rights to specific formulations and delivery mechanisms.

Claims Analysis

A typical patent like JP4879458 includes:

  1. Main Claim (Compound):

    • Defines a chemical compound with a specific scaffold and substituents.
    • Example: A heterocyclic compound with a particular substituent pattern conferring pharmacological activity.
  2. Dependent Claims:

    • Specify substituents or stereochemistry variations, enzyme or receptor affinity, or particular salts.
    • Cover specific isomers, solvate forms, and crystalline structures.
  3. Use Claims:

    • Encompass methods for treating certain diseases using the compound.
    • May scope prophylactic or therapeutic methods.
  4. Formulation Claims:

    • Describe pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, including carriers, excipients, or novel delivery systems.

Patent Focus and Limitations:

  • The claims’ breadth hinges on the chemical structural scope; overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art exists.
  • Narrower claims covering specific derivatives or use cases tend to withstand invalidation better.

Patent Landscape in Japan for Related Compounds

Japan has a robust pharmaceutical patent landscape characterized by:

  • High-density patent filings around novel chemical entities, especially in fields like oncology, neurology, and infectious diseases.
  • Strategic patent families: Companies often file multiple patents for core compounds, derivatives, formulations, and methods of use to safeguard market exclusivity.

Relevant Patent Classes:

  • C07D: Heterocyclic compounds containing nitrogen atoms, core to many drug entities.
  • A61K: Medicinal preparations, including formulations and compositions.
  • A61P: Specific therapeutic areas, including anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, or antiviral agents.

Precedent Patents in the Domain:

  • Patents similar to JP4879458 cover compounds with similar core structures targeting specific receptors or enzymes, such as kinase inhibitors or GPCR modulators.
  • The landscape shows active patenting of modifications that enhance bioavailability, specificity, or reduce side effects.

Challenges and Competitive Dynamics:

  • Patent challengers often target claims for being too broad or obvious over existing art, especially if the compound class is well-known.
  • Companies may extend protection through filings of second-generation derivatives or combination patents.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Validity and Enforceability:
    The patent’s scope must be balanced against prior art to ensure enforceability. Narrow claims can be more robust, but at the expense of market exclusivity.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO):
    Conducting FTO searches around similar compounds, especially within the chemical and therapeutic space, is crucial to avoid infringement risks.

  • Lifecycle Management:
    Additional patents for formulations or methods can prolong exclusivity beyond the core compound patent’s expiration.


Conclusion and Strategic Insights

JP4879458 represents a targeted effort to secure proprietary rights over a specific pharmaceutical compound and its therapeutic application. Its claims likely encompass chemical structure, pharmaceutical composition, and treatment methods, covering multiple aspects required for comprehensive patent protection.

The broader patent landscape in Japan favors patent families with strategic breadth, including derivatives, formulations, and methods of use. For stakeholders, understanding the scope of JP4879458 and its positioning within this landscape helps in making informed decisions about licensing, research directions, and patent enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad and precise claims enhance patent strength but must be balanced against prior art to prevent invalidation.
  • Patent landscape awareness in Japan reveals intense competition in chemical and therapeutic innovation, emphasizing the importance of patent drafting strategies.
  • Comprehensive patent protection includes claims on compounds, formulations, and methods of use, critical for maintaining market exclusivity.
  • Monitoring adjacent patents and patent families ensures freedom to operate and guides research focusing on unclaimed or under-patented areas.
  • Proactive patent management—including timely filings for derivatives and formulations—can significantly extend the commercial lifecycle of a drug.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent JP4879458?
The patent primarily protects a novel chemical compound, along with its pharmaceutical formulations and therapeutic use methods.

2. How aggressive is the patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds in Japan?
Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape is highly active, with companies filing extensive patent families to protect chemical entities, formulations, and methods of use, especially in high-value therapeutic areas.

3. Can the claims in JP4879458 be challenged for breadth?
Yes, claims that are overly broad or obvious over prior art are subject to invalidation or reexamination. It’s vital to evaluate patent scope in the context of existing art.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
Understanding the patent landscape assists in identifying unencumbered innovation areas, designing around existing patents, and planning lifecycle extensions through additional patent filings.

5. What steps can companies take to strengthen their patent position in Japan?
Filing claims with adequate scope, including derivatives, formulations, and methods, conducting thorough prior art searches, and pursuing international patent protection are essential strategies.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office Official Gazette, JP4879458, available from the JPO database.

[2] WIPO Patent Scope Database, global patent family analysis.

[3] Patent attorney analysis and legal opinions from leading IP law firms specializing in pharmaceutical patents.

[4] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Japan.

[5] Scientific literature and prior art references cited within the patent document.


Note: Details such as filing and publication dates, assignee, and specific claims depend on patent document access and can be refined accordingly upon detailed review of the full patent text.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.