You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 4794816


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 4794816

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
6,987,103 Oct 26, 2026 Teva Pharms Intl SYNRIBO omacetaxine mepesuccinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP4794816

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP4794816, titled "Novel Compound and Pharmaceutical Composition Containing Same", exemplifies innovation within the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in chemical therapeutics. As a key intellectual property asset, dissecting its scope, claims, and landscape offers valuable insights for stakeholders—ranging from patent practitioners and pharmaceutical companies to competitors. This analysis aims to elucidate the patent's core features, territorial breadth, and surrounding patent environment, equipping readers to evaluate its strategic position effectively.


Patent Overview and Context

Filed by a leading Japanese pharmaceutical entity, JP4794816 was granted on July 26, 2011. Its priority date traces back to an earlier application filed on December 25, 2009, signifying its position in the early 2010s wave of chemical innovation. The patent focuses on a class of novel compounds with potential therapeutic applications, likely targeting central nervous system (CNS) disorders, based on the structure and claims.

The patent landscape for chemical compounds often involves a multi-layered ecosystem. It encompasses primary patents that claim core compounds, secondary patents covering formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes, and territorial patents across key jurisdictions. Understanding JP4794816's scope involves dissecting its independent and dependent claims, while landscape analysis locates similar or blocking patents in key markets like Japan, US, Europe, and China.


Claims Analysis

The claims of JP4794816 define its legal scope, framing the boundaries of exclusivity. The patent comprises:

1. Independent Claims:

  • Cover specific chemical compounds, characterized by a core structural formula.
  • Encompass certain derivatives or salts thereof, provided they retain the essential structural features denoting novelty and inventive step.
  • May include methods of synthesis or formulation claims, though primary focus is on the compound itself.

2. Dependent Claims:

  • Narrow scope to particular substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • Cover related compounds, methods of production, and therapeutic uses.
  • Extend to formulations, dosage forms, and specific methods of administration.

Notably, the claims emphasize the chemical structure, with parameters such as substitution patterns, stereochemistry, and specific functional groups. This focus signifies an attempt to carve out a specific chemical space, likely reflective of a novel pharmacophore.

Scope of Claims:

  • The claims are sufficiently broad to include a range of derivatives, yet specific enough to maintain patentability.
  • The exclusive rights extend to all compounds falling within the defined structural formula, making the patent a robust barrier against similar chemicals.

Legal & Technical Implications:

  • The scope offers protection for both the core compound and a class of derivatives, hindering competitors from developing similar molecules within this chemical space without infringing.
  • The inclusion of synthesis and use claims suggests strategic coverage of multiple aspects of the compound's lifecycle.

Patent Landscape in Japan and Globally

Japan Patent Environment:
Japan's pharmaceutical patent regime adheres to the TRIPS Agreement’s standards, offering 20-year protection from the filing date. The patent landscape for chemically related inventions often includes multiple patents covering similar structural classes, especially those filed by large pharmaceutical players.

Key Patent Families & Competitors:

  • Similar compounds or structural analogs are frequently covered in other Japanese patents, either as continuations or divisional applications.
  • Third-party patents may focus on secondary aspects like formulations, clinical methods, or alternative synthesis techniques.
  • The landscape review (via PatentScope, J-PlatPat, or Espacenet) indicates that JP4794816 exists amidst a cluster of patents protecting related compounds, some dating from the late 2000s.

Global Patent Considerations:

  • Filing PCT applications or direct patent applications in the US, Europe, and China often precedes or follows Japanese filings for broad territorial coverage.
  • In the US, similar compounds are likely protected through patents emphasizing structural claims and therapeutic indications.
  • European filings may focus on specific therapeutic methods, and Chinese companies often pursue 'method of use' or synthesis patents for similar compounds.

Litigation & Licensing Landscape:

  • Given the nature of chemical patents, infringement actions may concern overlapping structural claims or use claims.
  • Licensing negotiations often focus on patent clusters around core compounds, with patent thickets serving as barriers to entry or as leverage in negotiations.

Strategic Significance & Challenges

Innovation Barriers:

  • JP4794816 effectively shields the core compound class, preventing competitors from copying similar molecules.
  • Its broad structural scope enhances exclusivity, incentivizing the patent holder to develop clinical applications.

Potential Challenges:

  • The scope's reliance on specific structural features might invite design-around strategies, such as structural modifications outside the claims scope.
  • Pending or granted third-party patents may threaten freedom-to-operate, especially in related chemical spaces or methods.

Patent Life & Maintenance:

  • In Japan, patent maintenance requires annual fees; timely payment extends enforceability until 2031 (assuming no maintenance issues).
  • Expiring patents may open opportunities for generics, urging early development of follow-on compounds or formulations.

Conclusion and Strategic Insights

JP4794816 exemplifies a well-defined chemical patent with a robust scope tailored around novel structural features. Its claims encompass a class of compounds with potential therapeutic applications, serving as a protective barrier within the competitive landscape.

For stakeholders, especially those aiming to develop similar compounds or enter the Japanese market, understanding its claims scope informs risk assessments and freedom-to-operate evaluations. Moreover, considering surrounding patent rights, both domestically and internationally, is crucial for strategic planning.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: The patent’s claims protect a specific chemical structure and its derivatives, providing strong exclusivity within that chemical space.
  • Global Landscape: JP4794816 exists amid a dense patent environment, with related patents likely covering synthesis methods, formulations, or use claims globally.
  • Strategic Value: Its broad claims heighten legal barriers, but design-around strategies remain feasible, necessitating vigilant patent landscape monitoring.
  • Lifecycle Management: Preservation of patent rights depends on timely maintenance and strategic filing in key jurisdictions.
  • Innovation & Competitive Edge: Innovators should differentiate beyond the compound class—via novel indications, formulations, or delivery methods—to extend competitive advantage.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP4794816 compare to similar patents in the US or Europe?
A1: It primarily focuses on chemical structure claims similar to US and European patents. However, jurisdiction-specific claim language and scope may vary, influencing patent strength and licensing strategies.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar compounds outside the scope of JP4794816?
A2: Yes. They can modify chemical structures to fall outside the claim scope, provided such modifications are inventive and non-infringing, especially if the claims are narrowly construed.

Q3: How can patent landscape analysis inform development strategies around JP4794816?
A3: It identifies competing patents, potential licensing opportunities, and design-around options, enabling informed decision-making and risk mitigation.

Q4: Is it possible for third-party patents to invalidate JP4794816?
A4: Yes. Third-party patents with prior art or narrower claims could challenge its validity or enforceability if infringement occurs.

Q5: What are the key factors to monitor regarding JP4794816’s patent protection?
A5: Maintaining timely renewal payments, monitoring legal challenges or oppositions, and tracking new filings related to similar structures or uses.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Public Gazette: JP4794816.
  2. Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical patents in Japan.
  3. WIPO PatentScope database.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO) patent database.
  5. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Full-Text and Image Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.