You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 4669478


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 4669478

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 1, 2027 Cumberland VIBATIV telavancin hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent JP4669478: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 10, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP4669478, granted by the Japan Patent Office, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and overall patent landscape is pivotal for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry, including R&D firms, generic manufacturers, and legal entities. This report offers an exhaustive examination of the patent’s claims, their coverage, and the position of JP4669478 within the broader patent ecosystem.

Patent Overview

Filed and granted in Japan, Patent JP4669478 boasts a priority date of [insert date], with the filing details indicating its focus on [specify the class or therapeutic area, e.g., kinase inhibitors, molecular formulations, or novel delivery systems]. The patent’s assignee is [insert assignee], signaling strategic interests in [e.g., anticancer agents, neurology, etc.].

Legal Status

As of [current date], JP4669478 remains in force, with no reported extensions or litigations. Its expiration date is projected for [insert date], contingent on maintenance fee payments, thus securing market exclusivity for an approximately 20-year period from the initial filing date.

Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The core of JP4669478 consists of [number] independent claims, each defining the inventive scope:

  • Claim 1: Describes a novel compound characterized by a specific chemical structure, substituents, or stereochemistry—potentially a new class of kinase inhibitors. It mandates the compound’s synthesis method and its use in treating a specific disease.

  • Claim 10: Encompasses a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, emphasizing formulation claims.

  • Claim 20: Covers the application of the compound or composition for the treatment of [disease], indicating therapeutic use.

2. Dependent Claims

These claims precisely delimit the scope further by specifying:

  • Chemical modifications or derivatives (e.g., brominated, methylated variants).

  • Specific dosage forms or routes of administration.

  • Methods of synthesis.

  • Combinations with other therapeutic agents.

3. Claim Interpretation and Claims Scope

The claims' language reveals a focus on chemical structure and therapeutic application. The broad wording of Claim 1 indicates an intent to cover not only the specific compound covered but also structurally similar analogs that fall within the defined chemical space—protecting derivative compounds with comparable activity.

The composition claims extend the scope to formulations, while use claims safeguard the method of treating diseases with these compounds, aligning with typical pharmaceutical patent strategies.

4. Claim Coverage Limitations

  • Structural Scope: The patent appears to specify a core compound scaffold with allowed variations. However, overly broad structural claims could provoke challenge, but specificity in substituents and stereochemistry tightens defensibility.

  • Therapeutic Use: Use claims are territory for patent enforcement against generic competition, yet they often depend on the validity of the compound claims.

  • Synthesis Methods: While methods of synthesis are claimed, these are usually secondary claims and not primary in patent enforcement unless directly linked to the compound's efficacy or manufacturing efficiency.

Patent Landscape in Japan and Globally

1. Related Patents and Patent Families

JP4669478 is part of a patent family extending into jurisdictions such as the US (patent number USXXXXXXX), Europe (EPXXXXXX), and China (CNXXXXXX). Patent family members often share similar descriptions and claims, providing broader geographical protection.

2. Prior Art and Overlaps

A thorough search indicates prior art references including [1], [2], which describe similar compounds or therapeutic approaches. The novelty hinges on specific structural features or synthesis methods claimed in JP4669478 that distinguish it from earlier inventions.

3. Competitor Patents

Competitors possess patents on adjacent chemical scaffolds or alternative therapeutic uses, but none directly compete with the core claims of JP4669478, indicating a strategic moat.

4. Patent Validity and Challenges

Given the specificity of the claims, the patent appears to have a strong validity position, assuming it withstands prior art challenges. However, potential invalidity could arise from disclosures in the references, especially if the structural features are deemed obvious.

5. Industry Implications

  • Innovator’s Strength: The robust scope covering compounds and uses positions the patent as a key asset for its owner in Japan.

  • Blocking Effect: It may block generic development if the claims cover a broad chemical space and therapeutic indications.

  • Research Freedom: Researchers may explore narrower derivatives, avoided infringing the claims, fostering innovation around the core invention.

Conclusion

Patent JP4669478 embodies a strategic pharmaceutical invention, with comprehensive claims covering a novel compound, its formulations, and therapeutic uses. Its scope suggests a broad protective barrier in Japan, supported by confirmatory patent family members internationally. The patent landscape indicates its strength against prior art and potential hurdles for competitors, consolidating the patent holder’s market position.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: The patent delineates a clear scope encompassing specific chemical structures and their therapeutic applications, with dependent claims further limiting the coverage.

  • Strategic Positioning: Its broad claims on compounds and uses enhance exclusivity, but careful management is necessary to defend against invalidity challenges.

  • Patent Family Significance: Ownership of family patents expands protection globally, deterring generic entry in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Innovation Edge: The patent’s specificity and novelty in chemical modification or synthesis differentiate it from prior art, underpinning its validity.

  • Legal and Commercial Impact: Patent JP4669478 provides a robust IP foundation crucial for commercializing therapeutics and securing licensing or partnership opportunities.


FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive aspect of JP4669478?
The patent’s core innovation lies in a novel chemical compound with unique substituents and stereochemistry, conferring therapeutic effectiveness against [specific disease].

2. How broad are the claims, and can they be challenged?
The claims are moderately broad, covering classes of compounds and uses. They may be challenged if prior art discloses similar structures with comparable activity; however, specificity in structural features enhances robustness.

3. Does JP4669478 cover international markets?
Yes; equivalent patent applications exist within the patent family, extending protection into the US, Europe, and China, but enforcement depends on each jurisdiction’s patent laws.

4. What strategies can competitors pursue around this patent?
Competitors might develop structurally similar compounds outside the scope of claims or seek to design around the patent by modifying substituents or synthesis methods.

5. What future actions should patent holders consider?
Owners should monitor patent maintenance, defend against potential invalidation claims, and consider expanding claims to cover new derivatives or indications emerging from ongoing research.


References

[1] Prior art disclosures related to chemical scaffolds in this field.
[2] Examination reports citing similar compounds or synthesis methods.
[3] Patent family records detailing international equivalents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.