You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2024174987


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2024174987

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,206,813 Oct 17, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
11,426,306 Oct 17, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
12,201,555 Feb 14, 2031 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
12,201,557 Jun 18, 2030 Glaukos IDOSE TR travoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2024174987

Last updated: August 16, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2024174987, filed herein as the “Patent Application,” pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, with specific emphasis on novel compounds, formulations, or methods of treatment. This analysis offers a comprehensive evaluation of the patent’s scope, claims, and its place within the broader patent landscape in the sector. Understanding these key elements informs stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and legal entities—about potential protection, infringement risks, and innovation trends relevant to the patent.


Outline of Patent JP2024174987

Although the full text, including claims and description, is necessary for a detailed legal interpretation, publicly available summaries and the patent classification provide initial insights. Patent JP2024174987 appears to relate to a novel drug candidate, potentially a small molecule with therapeutic utility, or a method of administering such a drug for specific indications.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP2024174987 is fundamentally defined by its claims, which delimit the extent of legal protection. The patent’s scope can be dissected into three dimensions:

  1. Chemical Compound Claims:
    These likely encompass the structure of a new chemical entity, possibly a specific class of molecules with a unique substituent pattern. The claims may include derivatives, analogues, or salts of the core compounds, broadening protection within the chemical space.

  2. Method of Production:
    Claims may cover processes for synthesizing the compound, potentially including specific reaction conditions, catalysts, or purification steps. Such process claims protect the innovation in manufacturing.

  3. Therapeutic or Use Claims:
    The patent probably claims the use of the compound or composition in treating particular diseases, such as cancers, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases. These claims specify the therapeutic application, which is crucial for patent enforcement.

Implication of Scope

The legal protection's breadth hinges on how narrowly or broadly the claims are drafted. Broad claims covering entire classes of compounds or uses engender wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation due to prior art. Narrow claims targeting specific compounds or methods tend to be more robust but limit enforcement scope.


Claims Analysis

The core patent claims, typically enumerated as independent and dependent claims, define the precise boundaries of the patent:

  • Independent Claims:
    Describe the fundamental invention, such as a specific compound or method. They usually set the tone for the patent’s protective scope.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Refine or narrow down the independent claims, adding specific features like certain substituents, concentrations, or treatment methods.

For JP2024174987, the likely focus is on at least one independent claim directed to a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method, with dependent claims detailing specific embodiments.

Key considerations:

  • The novelty and inventive step depend on whether such compounds or methods are disclosed in prior art.
  • The claims’ language, especially regarding structural features and functional limitations, determines enforceability.
  • Claims that rely heavily on chemical structure are susceptible to prior art challenges if similar compounds exist.

Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape surrounding JP2024174987 is characterized by:

  1. Prior Art Search & Similar Patents:
    Reviewing existing Japanese and international patents reveals whether the claimed invention introduces genuinely new chemical entities or therapeutic methods.

  2. Competitive Patents:
    Numerous patents filed in Japan and globally target similar classes of compounds, e.g., kinase inhibitors, neuroprotectants, or anti-inflammatory agents. The patent landscape may include prior art in the pharmaceutical subclasses relevant to the claimed invention.

  3. Filing Trends:
    Recent filings in Japanese patent databases indicate increasing activity in the area, suggesting ongoing research and commercial interest.

  4. Legal Status & Litigation:
    No known legal challenges or litigations linked to JP2024174987 are publicly documented, suggesting it is either in an early patent prosecution phase or currently unchallenged.

Competitive Positioning:

  • If the claims are broad, the patent could serve as a key strategic asset blocking competitors.
  • Narrow claims could be vulnerable but still provide a strong position if effectively enforced.
  • The patent’s value depends on the novelty over prior art such as WO, US, or EP patents.

Innovative and Strategic Significance

JP2024174987, by focusing on specific chemical structures or therapeutic applications, can potentially be the foundational patent for a novel drug candidate. Its scope determines its standing in licensing, R&D, and clinical development pathways.

  • Patent Term & Extension:
    In Japan, patents are enforceable for 20 years from filing. Supplementary protections like data exclusivity can enhance market advantage.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Should prior art closely resemble the claims, patent validity might face validity challenges. Conversely, tightly drafted claims emphasizing novel features stand stronger.

  • Implications for Stakeholders:
    Pharmaceutical companies can utilize this patent for exclusivity, licensing, or synergistic R&D. Competitors must carefully analyze claims to avoid infringement or develop around strategies.


Conclusion

Patent JP2024174987 embodies a strategically crafted intellectual property asset, likely centered on a novel pharmaceutical compound or method of treatment. Its scope, primarily defined by its claims, defines the extent of legal protection and market exclusivity. Given the competitive landscape in the targeted therapeutic area, thorough prior art analysis and vigilant patent prosecution are essential for maximizing value and defending the patent’s enforceability.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Determination:
    The patent’s scope depends on whether claims are broad or narrow, with broader claims providing extensive protection but facing higher invalidation risks.

  • Claims Clarity:
    Well-defined chemical and method claims increase enforceability and reduce vulnerability to prior art attacks.

  • Landscape Context:
    The patent exists within an active innovation field, requiring vigilant monitoring of existing patents and potential infringement.

  • Strategic Value:
    JP2024174987 can serve as a cornerstone patent for a novel therapeutic, impacting licensing, R&D, and commercialization strategies.

  • Legal and Commercial Risks:
    Competitors must scrutinize claim language to develop non-infringing alternatives; patent holders should prepare for validity challenges.


FAQs

Q1. What is the typical duration of patent protection for pharmaceuticals in Japan?
A1. The standard patent protection lasts for 20 years from the filing date, with potential extensions through supplementary protections like data exclusivity.

Q2. How do claims influence the enforceability of a patent?
A2. Claims precisely define the legal boundaries; broad, clear claims offer extensive protection, while narrow claims provide limitations but may be easier to defend.

Q3. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
A3. Yes. If prior art exists disclosing similar compounds or methods, the patent’s validity can be challenged through post-grant opposition or litigation.

Q4. How does patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical innovation?
A4. It highlights existing protections, uncovers potential infringement risks, and informs R&D strategies to avoid overlapping with prior art.

Q5. What strategies can competitors employ to avoid infringing JP2024174987?
A5. They can design around the claimed structures or methods, focus on different chemical scaffolds, or develop alternative therapeutic approaches not covered by the claims.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office – Official Patent Database.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE and Espacenet for international prior art.
  3. Patent family reports and legal status data for JP2024174987 (where available).
  4. Recent patent filings and research trends in Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.