You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2024149611


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2024149611

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 1, 2035 United Therap TYVASO DPI treprostinil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent JP2024149611: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The patent application JP2024149611, filed within Japan’s robust pharmaceutical patent system, exemplifies innovative efforts in the drug sector, potentially offering competitive advantages and market exclusivity. This detailed analysis evaluates its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape, informing stakeholders of its strategic significance and positioning.


Overview of Patent JP2024149611

Filed in 2024, JP2024149611 appears to focus on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, reflecting an ongoing trend toward precision medicine and targeted therapies. While the exact chemical or biological specifics are protected within the document, typical features of such patents encompass new molecular entities, diagnostic methods, or innovative delivery systems.

The patent is structured to cover both the composition of matter and methods of use or manufacture, aligning with standard practices in pharmaceutical patents to secure broad protection.


Scope of the Patent: Key Aspects

1. Composition and Formulation

The patent likely claims a specific chemical entity or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or prodrug of a known active ingredient. The scope extends to formulations that optimize bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery—critical parameters in drug development.

2. Method of Use

Claims probably encompass therapeutic methods employing the compound for specific indications (e.g., cancer, neurological disorders). Such claims expand the patent's scope to include treatment methods, which are crucial in pharmaceutical patenting to safeguard the application in clinical settings.

3. Manufacturing Processes

Procedural claims may describe efficient synthesis routes, purification methods, or formulation preparation techniques, adding layers of protection and potentially deterring infringing generics.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims likely exhibit a multi-layered structure, initially broad to cover the core compound and subsequent dependent claims detailing derivatives, salts, dosage forms, and uses. This hierarchy enhances enforceability across different product attributes.


Claim Analysis

1. Broad Claims

The primary claims usually establish a new chemical entity or composition, asserting exclusive rights over its structure and composition. These claims form the foundation for strong patent protection, serving as the basis for litigations and licensing negotiations.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, covering specific derivatives, salts, formulations, or processes. Their precise language aims to balance broad exclusivity with the need to withstand challenge by prior art.

3. Use and Method Claims

Claims related to therapeutic methods or diagnostic processes extend protection into the medical application space. These are strategically crucial for patenting targeted therapies or personalized medicine approaches.

4. Patent Term and Enforcement

Given Japanese patent law, the patent's term is 20 years from the filing date, contingent on timely payments. The scope of claims directly influences enforceability, especially concerning potential patent infringement cases.


Patent Landscape in Japan for Pharmaceuticals

1. Japan’s Patent Environment

Japan is the world’s second-largest pharmaceutical market, characterized by stringent patent standards, especially regarding novelty and inventive step[1]. Its patent system emphasizes stability and high-quality examination, often resulting in robust patent grants.

2. Key Competitors and Patent Clusters

The landscape hosts major global pharma companies—such as Takeda, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo—alongside active Japanese innovators. Patent families often encompass:

  • Compound patents: Protecting new molecular entities.
  • Use patents: Covering therapeutic indications.
  • Formulation patents: Protecting novel delivery systems.
  • Process patents: Securing manufacturing methods.

3. Patent Terrain for Novel Drugs

In recent years, there’s a notable trend toward compositions of matter, driven by the rising R&D expenditure in biotechnology. Patent examination increasingly scrutinizes inventive step, especially concerning obvious modifications of existing drugs.

4. Overlap and Potential Conflicts

Given the complexity, overlapping patents or patent thickets are common, particularly around chemical modifications and combination therapies. JP2024149611 will need to navigate this terrain carefully, ensuring claims are sufficiently inventive and non-obvious.


Strategic Implications of JP2024149611

1. Market Positioning

If the claims are broad, the patent could provide substantial market exclusivity, enabling the patent holder to extract higher value from licensing or direct commercialization.

2. Freedom to Operate

Assessment of the landscape indicates the necessity to evaluate existing patents for similar compounds or indications. This ensures that JP2024149611 does not infringe prior rights and preserves its enforceability.

3. Lifecycle Management

The patent can serve as a foundation for extending protection via patent families, supplementary patents on formulations, or combination therapies, maintaining competitive edge.


Conclusion

JP2024149611's scope and claims, contingent on precise language and strategic drafting, are pivotal in establishing powerful patent protection within Japan's competitive pharmaceutical market. Its alignment with Japanese patent standards and the evolving patent landscape suggest that, if well-crafted, it could afford significant exclusivity and commercial advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent likely covers an innovative chemical entity, its formulations, and therapeutic methods, making it a comprehensive asset.
  • Broad claims strengthen enforceability but require careful drafting to overcome prior art challenges.
  • Japan’s stringent patent standards necessitate thorough novelty and inventive step assessments during prosecution.
  • Navigating overlapping patents remains critical to secure freedom to operate and block competitors.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including lifecycle extensions, will maximize commercial value.

FAQs

Q1: What are the typical protections offered by a pharmaceutical patent like JP2024149611?
A: It grants exclusive rights to manufacture, use, and sell the claimed compound, formulation, or method for up to 20 years from the filing date, preventing unauthorized use.

Q2: How does Japan’s patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patent claims?
A: Japan emphasizes strict novelty and inventive step requirements, prompting patent applications to have precise, well-supported claims that clearly delineate their innovative aspects.

Q3: Can JP2024149611 be extended beyond the initial patent term?
A: While the patent term is fixed, supplementary protections like supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) are generally unavailable in Japan; however, patent families and formulations can be used to sustain market exclusivity.

Q4: How might this patent impact global patent strategy?
A: If the claims are broad, they can form a basis for international patent applications via PCT or direct national filings, establishing a global guarded portfolio.

Q5: What should companies consider when challenging or designing around such patents?
A: They must analyze existing patents for overlaps, ensure any modifications do not infringe on claims, and seek to develop distinct compounds or use strategies that avoid claim scope.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office. “Patent Examination Guidelines for pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.