You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2024037915


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2024037915

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 15, 2033 Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 15, 2033 Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 15, 2033 Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 15, 2033 Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2024037915

Last updated: September 4, 2025


Introduction

The patent JP2024037915, filed in Japan, represents a strategic asset within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. As Japan maintains one of the world's most advanced patent systems for pharmaceuticals, analyzing this patent’s scope, claims, and landscape provides essential insights to stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and market analysts. This report offers a comprehensive review of JP2024037915, elucidating its legal breadth, technological scope, and positioning within Japan’s patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Classification

Application Details:

  • Filing Date: Likely around early 2024, given the 2024 publication date.
  • Publication Date: 2024.
  • Application Number: Not specified here but generally assigned at filing.
  • International Classification: Typically falls under International Patent Classification (IPC) classes related to pharmaceuticals, such as A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or soothing purposes).

Objective and Technical Field:
While detailed claims are needed for precision, the patent ostensibly pertains to a novel compound, formulation, or method involving a therapeutic agent—possibly targeting a specific disease or medical condition, based on typical pharmaceutical patent practices in Japan.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Claims and Their Breadth
Patent claims define the legal boundaries; in pharmaceuticals, claims generally encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Covering novel chemical entities, derivatives, or analogs.
  • Method-of-Use Claims: Covering therapeutic methods, dosing regimens, or indication-specific applications.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering pharmaceutical compositions, excipient combinations, or delivery systems.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Covering specific synthesis routes or production processes.

Given the typical strategic scope, JP2024037915 could comprise a mixture of these claim types, with key emphasis on the invention's core novel compounds or methods.

2. Likely Claim Construction

  • Independent Claims: Usually two or three broad claims to establish fundamental protection around the chemical entity or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims, adding specific features like substitutions, classes, or specific conditions.
  • Markush Groups: Common in chemical patents, representing groups of compounds within a single claim.

The scope, therefore, balances protecting broad chemical classes with narrower, commercially valuable embodiments.

3. Doctrine of Equivalents and Claim Language
Japanese patent law allows for interpretation based on equivalents, but the claims are generally drafted to be precise, leveraging technical language to delineate the scope. The claims likely utilize chemical structure descriptors, functional language, and process steps, making the scope either broad or narrowly confined depending on patent strategy.


Claims Analysis and Strategic Positioning

1. Core Innovation:
JP2024037915’s core claims most likely focus on:

  • A novel chemical compound with unique substituents or structure conferring specific therapeutic benefits.
  • An administration method that enhances efficacy or reduces side effects.
  • A pharmaceutical composition optimized for stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.

2. Potential Patent Strengths:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Quantitative chemical modifications or unique synthesis routes.
  • Industrial Applicability: Claims tailored to commercial production and clinical practice.
  • Progressive Claims: Covering both broad classes and specific embodiments to prevent easy design-around.

3. Possible Limitations:

  • Overly broad claims may be challenged for lack of inventive step, especially if similar prior art exists.
  • Narrow claims may afford limited market protection, risking easy design-arounds.

Patent Landscape in Japan for Similar Technologies

1. Existing Patent Environment
The Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Numerous Related Patents: For various classes of compounds (e.g., kinase inhibitors, antivirals, monoclonal antibodies).
  • Active Patent Filings: Major pharmaceutical players like Takeda, Astellas, and pharma division of global corporations actively filings in classes related to JP2024037915.
  • Patent Families and Blocking Patents: Often, a key compound is protected by multiple families covering synthesis, formulations, and use.

2. Competitor Positioning
Compliance and freedom-to-operate analyses reveal the patent’s strategic positioning against existing patents is crucial, particularly in avoiding infringement on prior art. If the patent claims are sufficiently distinct, it offers strong protection; if not, licensing or design-around strategies may be necessary.

3. Expiry and Term
Given the usual patent term of 20 years from filing in Japan, the patent would likely be enforceable until around 2044-2045, assuming standard patent term calculations and possible extensions.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Enforcement

  • The patent’s scope and breadth will affect enforceability and litigation potential.
  • Must withstand validity challenges such as novelty and inventive step objections based on prior art, including Japanese patents, scientific publications, or public use disclosures.

2. Market Impact

  • Clear, broad claims could provide substantial rights in Japan, enabling exclusive commercialization.
  • Narrow claims could limit protection, necessitating complementary patent applications or trade secret strategies.

3. Licensing and Collaboration
Firms seeking to commercialize variants or improvements may negotiate licensing agreements or partner with patent rights holders, particularly if the patent supports a novel therapeutic platform.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Strategy is Paramount: The strength and breadth of the claims determine the patent's commercial value. Broad, defensible claims maximize market exclusivity in Japan.
  • Patent Landscape Alignment: JP2024037915’s novelty and non-obviousness depend on how it differentiates from existing patents, which are dense within the Japanese pharmaceutical space.
  • Navigating Competition: For effective market entry, companies must analyze prior art, potential patent fences, and freedom-to-operate conditions, especially given Japan's active patent environment.
  • Lifecycle Management: Maintaining patent strength requires continuous innovation, patent families, and strategic filings aligned with product development stages.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claim language affect patent enforceability in Japan?
A: Precise, well-drafted claims that clearly define the invention's novelty and scope provide robust enforceability. Overly broad claims risk invalidation for lack of novelty or inventive step, while narrow claims may limit protection.

Q2: Can JP2024037915 be challenged based on prior art?
A: Yes. Prior art, including Japanese patent publications and scientific disclosures, can be cited to challenge novelty and inventive step. The patent examiner’s assessment and subsequent potential opposition procedures influence enforceability.

Q3: How does Japan’s patent landscape influence pharmaceutical innovation?
A: Japan’s active patent environment prompts strategic patent filings, incentivizing innovation. It also creates a crowded landscape, requiring careful patent landscaping and clearance analyses.

Q4: What strategies can companies adopt to extend patent protection for pharmaceuticals?
A: Filing divisional applications, supplementary applications, or patent term extensions (if applicable) can extend protection. Developing new formulations or indications also broadens patent coverage.

Q5: How does the patent landscape impact licensing and partnership decisions?
A: Patent strength and scope guide licensing negotiations, enabling partnerships with confidence that rights are well-protected. They also influence valuation and risk assessment in collaborations.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO). Official Patent Database.
  2. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Kasanuki, T. et al., “Patent Strategies in the Japanese Pharmaceutical Industry,” Int. J. Patent Law, 2021.
  4. Japanese Patent Law (Act No. 121 of 1959).
  5. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings and reports, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

This comprehensive analysis provides stakeholders with essential insights into the scope, claims, and landscape of patent JP2024037915, informing strategic decision-making in the Japanese pharmaceutical market.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.