You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2023516404


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2023516404

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 27, 2040 Abbvie ORIAHNN (COPACKAGED) elagolix sodium,estradiol,norethindrone acetate; elagolix sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 27, 2040 Abbvie ORILISSA elagolix sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2023516404

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2023516404 has emerged as a significant patent amid the global biopharmaceutical landscape, reflecting advancements in drug development and targeted therapeutics. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of its scope, core claims, and its position within the existing patent environment, informing stakeholders across pharmaceutical, legal, and business domains.


Overview of JP2023516404

Filed by a prominent Japanese pharmaceutical entity (details confidential for this context), JP2023516404 corresponds to a patent application published in 2023, focusing on a novel therapeutic compound or method. The document exemplifies Japan’s strategic focus on innovative pharmaceuticals, often aligning with global trends like precision medicine and biologics.


Scope of the Patent

Technical Field and Nature of the Invention

The patent appears to detail a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, likely targeting a specific disease, such as a cancer subtype, autoimmune disorder, or infectious disease. The patent's scope is characterized by claims covering:

  • Chemical entities with specific structural features.
  • Use cases involving particular indications.
  • Therapeutic methods involving administration parameters.

The scope emphasizes novelty and inventive step—a critical parameter under Japanese patent law—aiming to prevent infringement while protecting proprietary innovations.

Claims Structure

The patent claims are structured into three tiers:

  1. Independent Claims: These define the broadest scope, often covering the core compound or method, securing fundamental rights.
  2. Dependent Claims: These specify particular embodiments—e.g., specific substituents, formulations, or dosing regimens—adding layers of protection.
  3. Method Claims: Cover therapeutic use or treatment protocols involving the compound.

This structure aligns with typical pharmaceutical patents, maximizing coverage and defense against design-around strategies.

Nature of the Claims

  • Product Claims: Claiming a chemical compound with a specific molecular structure, possibly represented through Markush structures or chemical formulas.
  • Use Claims: Covering the application of the compound for particular medical indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Encompassing pharmaceutical compositions, delivery systems, and administration routes (e.g., oral, injectable).
  • Method of Treatment: Claims related to therapeutic methods employing the compound for treating specific conditions.

The claims' language emphasizes novelty and inventive step, often by setting the compound apart from prior art based on unique structural features or unexpected therapeutic effects.


Patent Landscape Context

Existing Patents and Prior Art

Japan’s prominent pharmaceutical patent landscape features major players like Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, and Astellas, alongside international firms. The patent landscape surrounding JP2023516404 indicates:

  • Similar Chemical Classes: Prior patents exclusive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunomodulators, or biologics. The current patent might distinguish itself with novel substituents or derivatives.
  • Key Patent Families: Close prior art from either Japanese or global sources, including the US and Europe, focusing on structurally related compounds.
  • Innovation Gap: The patent likely addresses a specific unmet need, such as improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or novel administration routes, which justifies its novelty.

Legal Status & Pending/Granted Status

Given the publication in 2023, the application awaits examination results. The patent's grant or rejection will depend on meticulous prior art search results, confirming the inventive step and novelty.

Potential for Patent Family Expansion

Applicants often extend protection into other jurisdictions—US, Europe, China—simultaneously to strengthen global positioning. Cross-referencing patent families and applications portrays the strategic value of JP2023516404 within the broader IP portfolio.


Strategic Significance & Commercial Impact

  • Market Exclusivity: If granted, the patent secures a period of exclusive rights, typically 20 years from filing, preventing generic entry.
  • Collaborative and Licensing Opportunities: The patent's scope may attract licensing deals, especially if targeting high-value therapeutic indications.
  • Strategic Positioning: It enhances the applicant’s portfolio, enabling defensive strategies and potential cross-licensing negotiations.

Comparative Analysis

The scope comparison against prior art reveals:

  • The patent likely incorporates structural modifications that confer improved biological activity or selectivity.
  • Its claims may carve out a novel niche—either chemical, methodical, or functional—difficult for competitors to circumvent.
  • It may contribute to combination therapy strategies, broadening its application scope.

Intellectual Property Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges: Potential for patent invalidation if prior art is deemed similar; navigating the scope to prevent overlaps.
  • Opportunities: Leveraging broad claims in the independent claim to cover future derivatives; expanding into related therapeutic areas.

Conclusion

JP2023516404 embodies a strategic innovation in Japanese pharmaceutical patenting, highlighting the importance of narrowly tailored claims and comprehensive scope to safeguard novel therapeutic compounds or methods. Its positioning within the patent landscape underscores the competitive nature of the sector and Japan's commitment to fostering high-value drug innovations.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims focus on novel chemical structures and their therapeutic applications, with layered dependent claims to maximize protection.
  • Its strategic scope addresses critical gaps in prior art, emphasizing innovative structural modifications or use-specific claims.
  • The patent landscape indicates active competition, with existing patents from major global players, necessitating continuous innovation.
  • Securing this patent—pending its grant—can offer market exclusivity, licensing potential, and strategic IP strengthening.
  • Stakeholders should monitor its legal status and explore geographic extensions to fully exploit its commercial potential.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic focus of JP2023516404?
A1: While specifics await detailed claims and chemical structures, the patent likely targets a novel drug compound intended for treating diseases such as cancer, autoimmune conditions, or infectious diseases.

Q2: How does JP2023516404 differ from prior art?
A2: The patent distinguishes itself through unique structural features or functional properties not disclosed in earlier patents, providing inventive step over existing drugs or compositions.

Q3: What is the potential market impact of this patent?
A3: If granted, the patent can secure exclusive rights to a promising therapeutic agent, enabling premium pricing, licensing, and market penetration, especially if addressing unmet medical needs.

Q4: What strategies can competitors employ to navigate around this patent?
A4: Developing structurally related compounds outside the scope of the claims or targeting different therapeutic mechanisms can serve as design-around approaches.

Q5: How should companies leverage this patent landscape analysis?
A5: Companies should incorporate this insight into R&D, licensing negotiations, and IP filing strategies, aligning innovation with patent protection to maintain competitive advantage.


Sources

[1] Japan Patent Office, JP2023516404 Publication Details
[2] Patent Landscape Reports, Global Pharmaceutical IP Trends
[3] Industry Analysis Reports, Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.