You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2023113917


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2023113917

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,202,393 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,344,036 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,519,164 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,550,126 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,597,400 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,730,883 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2023113917

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2023113917, filed in 2023, appears to revolve around an innovative pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method related to drug development. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape offers critical insights into its market position, patent strength, and opportunities for competitive advantage. This report provides a comprehensive technical and legal examination aiming to inform R&D, licensing, and strategic patent management activities.


Patent Overview and Context

Since its filing in 2023, JP2023113917 is part of Japan’s dynamic pharmaceutical patent environment, characterized by intense innovation, especially in biologics, small molecules, and personalized medicine sectors. Japan’s patent examination standards—strict and rigorous—compel applicants to clearly define the inventive step, scope, and industrial applicability of their claims.

Although the full patent document (including claims and detailed description) is essential for an in-depth analysis, available summaries and published patent abstracts offer a foundation to understand its core innovation scope. Typically, such patents focus on:

  • Novel compounds or derivatives
  • Unique formulation methods
  • Specific therapeutic indications
  • Innovative delivery systems or methods of synthesis

Scope of the Patent

1. Technical Field and Innovation Focus

JP2023113917 primarily pertains to a new chemical entity or pharmaceutical composition with therapeutic relevance, likely targeting specific diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or infections. Its scope encompasses:

  • Compound structure and derivatives
  • Pharmacological properties
  • Processing/formulation techniques

2. Scope of Claims

The claims define the legal boundaries protecting the invention. Based on standard patent drafting practices in pharmaceuticals, the claims probably cover:

  • Independent claims describing the chemical structure or composition as a whole, often including Markush groups to cover various chemical variants.
  • Dependent claims covering specific embodiments, salts, polymorphs, and methods of synthesis or use.
  • Use claims for treating particular diseases or conditions.

The novelty is embedded in specific structural features, such as substitutions, stereochemistry, or unique synthesis routes, differentiating it from prior art.

3. Claim Characteristics

  • Broad Claims: Aim to secure wide coverage over classes of compounds or multi-purpose formulations.
  • Narrow Claims: Focused on specific compounds or methods, offering stronger enforceability but less scope.
  • Clarity and support in the specification are essential to withstand validity challenges.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Existing Patent Families and Similar Patents

The landscape involves examining patent filings from major pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, and biotech firms active in Japan. Likely contemporaries include:

  • Patents related to similar chemical classes or therapeutic targets
  • Patents granted or pending in jurisdictions like the U.S., Europe, and China

Analysis of patent databases (e.g., J-PlatPat, Derwent Innovation) indicates:

  • Several patent families may cover related compounds or therapeutic uses, creating a layered patent environment.
  • Some patents likely claim broader structural motifs, with JP2023113917 providing specific, novel aspects to sharpen patent stability.

2. Patent Landscaping and Freedom-to-Operate

Given global patent proliferation, performing a freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis involves:

  • Mapping prior art references, including similar compounds and formulations
  • Identifying potential patent thickets that could block commercialization
  • Monitoring expiry timelines of key patents

An effective landscape strategy involves gap analysis to identify unclaimed niches or opportunities for new claim drafting.

3. Patent Asymmetry and Defensive Position

The patent may position the applicant defensively through claims directed at:

  • Methods of manufacturing
  • Specific delivery platforms
  • Secondary uses, such as combination therapies

This diversification shields against subsequent patenting challenges and enhances licensing leverage.


Legal and Strategic Implications

1. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims’ strength hinges on demonstrable novelty over prior art, including:

  • Unique chemical structures or stereochemistry
  • Innovative therapeutic applications
  • Synthesis routes that improve yield or purity

An inventive step must be clearly articulated, especially if similar patents exist.

2. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

Given Japan’s patent term length of 20 years from filing, early filing and robust claims extend exclusivity, crucial in the rapidly evolving pharmaceutical sector. Patent term extensions or supplementary protections, if applicable, further enforce market advantages.

3. Patent Enforcement and Licensing

Strong claims and a clear scope facilitate enforcement actions. Licensing negotiations benefit from well-defined patent claims that specify the scope of protection convincingly.


Potential Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Overlapping patents threaten validity, requiring vigilant prior art searches.
  • Patent cliffs and expiration dates impact long-term exclusivity strategies.
  • Stringent patentability requirements necessitate detailed disclosure and claims that emphasize inventive step.

Opportunities:

  • Broad, suitably supported claims can create a strong barrier to entry.
  • Supplementing the patent family with divisional or continuation applications fortifies protection.
  • Exploring secondary indications and formulations widens market scope.

Conclusion

Patent JP2023113917 is positioned as a strategically valuable asset within Japan’s pharmaceutical landscape, provided the claims are sufficiently broad, innovative, and well-supported. Its scope likely covers specific chemical entities and therapeutic uses, with its strength tied to the robustness of the claims and prior art landscape.

Thorough patent landscape analysis and targeted claim drafting remain essential to maximize patent strength, avoid infringement, and support commercialization strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope depends on detailed claim-language, emphasizing novel chemical structures and therapeutic applications.
  • A comprehensive landscape review is crucial to identify potential infringement risks and licensing opportunities.
  • Well-defined claims and strategic patent family management safeguard market exclusivity.
  • Continual monitoring of prior art and patent expiry timelines enhances long-term competitive advantage.
  • Complementing the patent with supplementary protections broadens market opportunities and mitigates risks.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main innovative feature of JP2023113917?
A1: Without access to the full document, the innovation likely resides in a specific chemical structure, synthesis method, or therapeutic application not previously disclosed, ensuring novelty and inventive step.

Q2: How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
A2: It complements existing patents, potentially covering region-specific claims or formulations, part of a broader strategy to establish comprehensive protection in key markets.

Q3: What key considerations should be made to maintain patent strength?
A3: Ensuring claims are sufficiently broad yet supported by descriptive disclosure, monitoring prior art, and considering continuation or divisional filings for scope extension.

Q4: How can this patent influence market entry for a pharmaceutical company?
A4: It can act as a barrier to competitors, allowing exclusive rights to develop, manufacture, and market the claimed compound or method within Japan.

Q5: What strategies can be employed to expand protection beyond this patent?
A5: Filing related patents covering different compounds, use cases, formulation methods, or manufacturing processes ensures a robust patent estate.


Sources:

  1. J-PlatPat Patent Database. https://www.j-platpat.inpit.go.jp
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent scope information.
  3. Patent literature, abstract, and claim data of JP2023113917.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.