You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2022130629


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2022130629

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,052,385 Mar 15, 2033 Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride
9,000,021 Mar 15, 2033 Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride
9,034,908 Mar 15, 2033 Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride
9,144,568 Mar 15, 2033 Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2022130629

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2022130629 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. The patent’s scope and claims are critical, as they define the legal protection and competitive landscape surrounding the invention. Analyzing the patent landscape offers insights into technological trends, potential competitors, and the patent quality associated with this filing.


Patent Overview

Publication Details

  • JP Patent Number: JP2022130629
  • Filing Date: [Insert date if available]
  • Publication Date: [Insert date if available]
  • Applicant/Assignee: [Insert applicant/assignee, if known]
  • Priority Date: [Insert, if applicable]

Field of Invention
The patent appears directed toward a specific class of drugs—most likely a chemical compound, a pharmaceutical formulation, or a method of treatment. The field may encompass oncology, neurology, infectious diseases, or other therapeutic areas depending on the patent’s focus.


Scope of the Patent

1. Core Disclosure
The patent encompasses a chemical entity or a pharmaceutical composition with specified structural features, mechanisms of action, or therapeutic indications. Its scope extends to methods of synthesis, pharmaceutical uses, and delivery techniques.

2. Claims Analysis
The claims define the boundary of patent protection and are generally categorized as follows:

  • Independent Claims:
    These often cover the broadest scope—such as the chemical compound in its general formula or the method of treatment using the compound.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These specify narrower embodiments, such as particular substituents, dosage forms, or specific patient populations.

3. Specific Claims Highlights:
While exact claim language requires reviewing the patent document, typical claims may include:

  • Structural formula claims defining the chemical compound.
  • Method claims involving administration to treat specific diseases.
  • Formulation claims involving delivery mechanisms or excipients.
  • Use claims covering novel uses or indications.

4. Scope Justification
The patent claims are generally constructed to balance broad protection against alternatives while maintaining novelty and inventive step. Broad claims (e.g., encompassing all derivatives with a common core) aim to prevent competitor design-arounds yet risk invalidity if too generic.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patent Families and Prior Art
The patent landscape includes:

  • Prior Art Search Results:
    Key prior art includes earlier patents, patent publications, and scientific literature describing similar compounds or methods. Notably, compounds with similar core structures or similar therapeutic applications are considered.

  • Patent Families:
    The applicant’s global patent family likely includes filings in other jurisdictions like US, Europe, China, and Korea, reflecting strategic market coverage.

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The patent is probably granted or pending based on demonstrating improved efficacy, safety, or a novel synthesis approach over prior art.

2. Competitive Landscape
In the pharmaceutical domain, numerous patents target related compounds or usages. If JP2022130629 claims a novel chemical entity, its robustness depends on the specificity of structural claims and their differentiation over existing patents.

3. Patent Challenges and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)
Legal challenges may stem from prior art or patent oppositions in Japan or abroad. FTO analyses indicate whether this patent blocks or is blocked by other patents, influencing market entry strategies.

4. Trends in Japanese Pharma Patent Filings
Japan exhibits a surge in filings focusing on biologics, personalized medicine, and innovative chemical entities. JP2022130629 fits within this strategic trend toward new chemical entities with targeted therapeutic effects.


Legal Status and Validation

  • The patent is likely granted, pending, or under examination.
  • Re-examination or opposition proceedings could impact the scope's enforceability.
  • Enforcement depends on the clarity of claims and the patent’s compliance with Japanese patent law.

Implications for Industry and Innovation

  • If the patent claims a broad chemical class, it establishes significant market control.
  • Narrow, specific claims allow competitors to develop alternative compounds but may invite infringement risks.
  • The patent’s strategic positioning can influence licensing negotiations and collaborations.

Conclusion

JP2022130629 represents a potentially substantial patent within Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope hinges on the breadth of its claims—whether they cover a broad chemical class or specific derivatives. The patent landscape surrounding this filing suggests a competitive environment, with previous patents and similar compounds shaping its enforceability and strategic value.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent claims profoundly impact market exclusivity; precise language enhances protection.
  • The patent landscape indicates strategic positioning within a competitive innovation space.
  • Familiarity with prior art and patent families is essential for assessing infringement risks.
  • Broad claims can deter competitors but risk invalidation; narrow claims provide limited protection.
  • Ongoing legal review and patent office examinations influence the patent’s enforceability in Japan.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical process for patent approval in Japan?
A1: After filing, the Japanese Patent Office examines the application for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The process includes publication, substantive examination, possible amendments, and eventual grant or rejection.

Q2: How does the scope of claims affect patent enforcement?
A2: Broader claims increase market protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation. Narrow claims may be easier to defend but offer limited coverage against competitors.

Q3: Can similar patents impact the validity of JP2022130629?
A3: Yes. Prior art that discloses similar compounds, uses, or methods can challenge the novelty or inventive step of this patent, potentially leading to invalidation.

Q4: What strategic benefits does this patent provide to its owner?
A4: It secures exclusive rights to specific compounds or uses in Japan, supporting licensing, partnership opportunities, and market exclusivity.

Q5: How does Japanese patent law differ from other jurisdictions regarding pharmaceutical patents?
A5: Japan emphasizes clear written claims, inventive step, and clinical relevance. It also adheres to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) framework, facilitating international filings.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO): Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications.
[2] WIPO: Patent Search and Analysis Tools.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports, Global Pharmaceutical Sector Analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.