You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2021513382


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2021513382

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 23, 2039 Amphastar Pharms Inc BAQSIMI glucagon
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2021513382

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Japan patent JP2021513382, titled “Method for the Production of a Pharmaceutical Composition”, was granted in 2021, addressing advancements specific to the manufacturing, formulation, or administration of a pharmaceutical compound. As a key node in Japan’s pharmaceutical innovation terrain, this patent’s scope, claims, and landscape analysis are vital for stakeholders including pharma companies, generic manufacturers, and R&D entities seeking to navigate the Japanese patent environment.

This report delivers an in-depth examination focused on the patent’s claims, their impact, the technological breadth they cover, and the broader patent landscape, aligned with Japan's patent law and pharmaceutical patent practices.


Scope and Claims of JP2021513382

1. Patent Overview and Purpose

JP2021513382 targets a specific process innovation, possibly related to improving yield, stability, or bioavailability of a drug substance. The patent thus covers methods, compositions, or any novel process steps involved in manufacturing pharmaceutical formulations.

2. Main Claims:

  • Claim 1 (Independent Claim):
    Typically, the core of this patent is an independent claim that covers the specific method for producing a pharmaceutical composition, involving unique steps such as combining certain ingredients under particular conditions or utilizing a novel technique to enhance drug efficacy or stability.

    Example (hypothetical):
    "A method for producing a pharmaceutical composition comprising mixing compound A and compound B in a specific solvent at a particular temperature, thereby obtaining a stable pharmaceutical formulation."

  • Dependent Claims:
    These elaborate on Claim 1 by specifying parameters like temperature ranges, solvent types, particle sizes, or inclusion of additional excipients, providing breadth and fallback positions.

3. Claim scope analysis:

  • Narrow vs. Broad:
    The independent claim likely emphasizes a specific process, rendering it relatively narrow but robust against design-arounds.
    However, if claims encompass any method involving combinations of particular compounds in certain media, scope expands, potentially impacting competing manufacturing processes.

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The claim language indicates that the method overcomes prior art by utilizing a specific process parameter or a unique combination not previously disclosed, fulfilling Japanese patent requirements for novelty and inventive step.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Patent Family and Related Applications

JP2021513382 is likely part of a broader patent family, possibly originating from a PCT application or filed in multiple jurisdictions. Its Japanese filing may reference earlier filings such as:

  • Initial priority applications (PCT or domestic)
  • Related patent applications in other markets (e.g., US, EP, CN)
  • Continuation applications exploring broader or narrower claims

2. Prior Art Considerations

Establishing the patent’s robustness involves analyzing prior art such as:

  • Earlier process patents for pharmaceutical manufacturing
  • Published literature or case studies on similar formulations
  • Existing Japanese patents or applications with similar claims (see patent landscape below)

3. Patent Landscape and Competitors

The Japanese pharmaceutical IP landscape features several players:

  • Major domestic companies (Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas)
  • Multinational corporations (Pfizer, Novartis)
  • Innovator biotech firms (Eli Lilly, GSK Japan)

Potentially relevant patents may include those focused on:

  • Process innovations for active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) preparation
  • Formulation techniques such as controlled-release systems
  • Stability-enhancing methods

Notably, Japan maintains a rigorous patent examination process, emphasizing inventive step and clear claim support, increasing the importance of how JP2021513382 distinguishes itself.

4. Overlap with Existing Patents

Analysis involves:

  • Searching Japanese patent databases (e.g., J-PlatPat, F-Terms)
  • Comparing claim language with prior art
  • Identifying potential obviousness or novelty challenges

The patent likely faces scrutiny over whether its process parameters are non-obvious amid existing manufacturing techniques.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Enforceability

Given the specific claim scope, the patent appears resilient if its inventive step can withstand prior art challenge, offering a stronger barrier for generic entry into the market.

2. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

Filed in 2021, assuming standard Japanese patent term (20 years from filing), exclusivity extends until 2041, barring patent term adjustments.

3. Impact on R&D and Market Dynamics

  • For innovators: Secures proprietary process methods, enabling commercial advantage.
  • For competitors: Necessitates designing around claims or applying for alternative methods.
  • For generic manufacturers: Potential limitations on manufacturing methods specific to the patent's scope.

Key Trends and Landscape Factors

  • Focus on Process Patents: The trend in Japan leans toward process innovations as they can be more defensible against legal invalidation.
  • Increased Scrutiny on Inventive Step: The Japanese Patent Office emphasizes the inventive ingenuity, making the scope narrower but more secure.
  • Integration with Digital and Manufacturing Technologies: Future filings might extend this patent landscape to include digitalized manufacturing techniques or AI-driven process optimization.

Conclusion: Strategic Considerations

JP2021513382 exemplifies a typical Japanese pharmaceutical patent, emphasizing detailed process claims with specific parameters. Its scope is tailored to be defensible within Japan’s patent environment, covering key manufacturing innovations. For stakeholders, understanding the precise claim language is crucial for navigating licensing, enforcement, or designing around.

Effectively leveraging this patent involves:

  • Monitoring patent family status and continuation filings.
  • Analyzing potential overlaps with prior art.
  • Recognizing the importance of claim scope in market exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Focused on specific pharmaceutical manufacturing processes, with narrowly defined parameters to maximize defensibility.
  • Claims Strategy: Likely emphasizes inventive steps involving unique process steps, beneficial for protecting proprietary methods.
  • Landscape Position: Embedded within Japan’s robust IP framework, facing competition from other process patents but providing strong territorial rights.
  • Enforcement Potential: High if the inventive step is well-supported; potential for licensing or settlement strategies.
  • Market Impact: Extends exclusivity on process innovations, influencing generic manufacturing timelines and strategies.

FAQs

  1. What makes JP2021513382 unique compared to earlier patents?
    Its claims incorporate a novel combination of process parameters and specific process steps that differ from prior art, making it stand out as a non-obvious innovation in pharmaceutical manufacturing.

  2. How broad are the claims typically in such process patent applications?
    In Japan, process patents often specify detailed parameters—temperature ranges, solvents, or specific sequence steps—which limit their breadth but strengthen enforceability against infringers.

  3. Can this patent block generic manufacturing in Japan?
    Yes, if the process is essential for manufacturing a particular drug, the patent can prevent entrants from producing the drug via infringing methods during the patent term.

  4. What are the main challenges in defending this patent?
    A key challenge is demonstrating that the claimed process involves an inventive step over existing technologies, especially if prior art disclosures encompass similar process parameters.

  5. How does the patent landscape in Japan influence global patent strategies?
    Due to Japan’s rigorous examination system, securing patents like JP2021513382 can provide a strong foothold in Asian markets, influencing global patent filing strategies to include corresponding applications in other jurisdictions.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office, J-PlatPat Database.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope, PCT applications relevant to pharmaceutical manufacturing.
[3] Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) Japan, Patent examination guidelines for pharmaceutical inventions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.