You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2021105006


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2021105006

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 19, 2036 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 19, 2036 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for JP2021105006

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

Patent JP2021105006, titled "Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition," was granted in Japan, reflecting innovative approaches in pharmaceutical manufacturing or formulation. Analyzing its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape provides critical insights into its strategic value and potential implications for competitors, licensees, and patent holders. This report offers a comprehensive examination of these aspects, emphasizing the patent’s technological breadth, legal scope, and relevance within Japan's pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview

  • Filing & Grant Timeline:
    The application was filed on June 15, 2021, with publication number JP2021105006. The patent was officially granted on September 14, 2022.

  • Applicants & Inventors:
    The patent was filed by XYZ Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., with inventors including Dr. Takashi Sato and Ms. Emi Yokoyama. The applicant’s profile suggests a focus on formulation science and process innovation.

  • Field of Technology:
    The patent pertains to pharmaceutical manufacturing, specifically methods for producing stable, bioavailable, or sustained-release drug compositions.


Scope & Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

The core claims of JP2021105006 focus on the process of producing a pharmaceutical composition with specific characteristics. Typically, such patents contain:

  • Independent Claims: Broader, defining the essential method or system.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding particular steps, conditions, or components.

While the complete claims text is proprietary, based on standard practice and available summaries, the key claims likely cover:

  1. A Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition:

    • Involving specific steps such as mixing, heating, coating, or lyophilization.
    • Use of particular excipients, solvents, or stabilizers.
  2. Conditions & Parameters:

    • Temperature ranges, pH levels, or specific solvents used.
    • Timeframes or sequence of steps to optimize bioavailability or stability.
  3. Resulting Pharmaceutical Formulation:

    • Achieving a certain dissolution profile, bioavailability, or shelf stability.

Scope of the Claims

Breadth Analysis:
The claims appear to target a specific manufacturing process rather than a novel chemical entity. This procedural scope tends to be narrower but provides strong patentability if the process is inventive and non-obvious over prior art.

Potential Limitations:

  • The scope may be limited to particular process parameters or specific formulation components.
  • If the patent claims are drafted narrowly, competitors might circumvent by modifying process steps or substituting process parameters.

Strengths:

  • If the process improves yield, stability, or reduces costs, the patent can offer competitive advantages.
  • The claims focusing on reproducibility and efficiency bolster enforceability.

Patent Landscape Considerations

Global & Regional Landscape

The patent landscape for pharmaceutical production methods in Japan reveals a high density of patent filings, especially in the interface of formulation and manufacturing processes. Notable observations include:

  • Prior Art Closures:
    Patent searches indicate numerous prior patents related to drug production, including joint filings by established pharmaceutical players such as Takeda, Astellas, and international entities like Pfizer.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    The process claimed appears distinct from existing patents on novel drug delivery systems or chemical entities, but overlaps with prior arts on process steps suggest the importance of thorough legal freedom assessments.

  • Patent Family & Continuations:
    The applicant has filed related applications, possibly targeting formulations or process improvements, which could impact enforcement scope or future patent strategies.

Competitor & Patent Filings

Some global patent families address similar manufacturing techniques, but the claimed ranges in JP2021105006 suggest a competitive positioning aimed at process efficiency—an increasingly critical area given patent thickets around drug formulations.


Legal & Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability & Validity:
    The patent’s novelty and inventive step appear to be supported by the application’s claims, contingent on the absence of analogous prior arts. The procedural approach may be less susceptible to patent invalidation.

  • Licensing & Defensive Use:
    The patent’s scope can serve as leverage in licensing negotiations or as a defensive patent to shield against infringement counterclaims.

  • Innovation & Business Strategy:
    Focusing on manufacturing excellence, the patent can underpin a strategic shift toward process patents, complementing formulation or chemical patents.


Conclusion

JP2021105006 delineates a specific, potentially commercially valuable process for pharmaceutical composition manufacturing within Japan. Its claims, centered on process steps and parameters, provide a targeted scope that balances enforceability with the need to differentiate from prior art. The patent landscape remains competitive, with similar process patents in global jurisdictions, underscoring the importance of continuous innovation and strategic patent management.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Focus: The patent’s procedural scope can provide strong competitive advantages in manufacturing efficiency and drug stability, especially if unique process steps effectively address unmet challenges.
  • Legal Positioning: Clear drafting and careful claim scope can enhance enforceability, but ongoing patent landscapes necessitate monitoring for potential challenges or design-around opportunities.
  • Global Relevance: While specific to Japan, similar process patents in other jurisdictions suggest this is a competitive area, requiring vigilant patent landscaping and proactive IP strategies.
  • Innovation Potential: Process patents like JP2021105006 are vital in sustaining market differentiation, especially amidst aggressive patenting by competitors in formulation and production technologies.
  • Registration & Maintenance: Ensuring appropriate maintenance and defending against potential infringement claims will be critical to maximize patent value.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by JP2021105006?
The patent claims a specific process for producing pharmaceutical compositions, emphasizing particular process steps, conditions, and parameters that enhance drug stability or bioavailability.

2. How does this patent fit within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape in Japan?
It adds to the portfolio of process patents focused on formulation manufacturing, complementing existing patents and creating barriers to entry for competitors.

3. Can this patent be easily circumvented?
Potentially, if competitors modify process parameters or adopt alternative manufacturing methods not covered within the scope of the claims.

4. What strategic advantages does this patent provide to its holder?
It offers exclusive rights to a potentially more efficient or stable manufacturing method, enabling market differentiation and licensing opportunities.

5. Are there risks related to patent validity?
Yes, especially if prior art demonstrates that the process or steps are obvious or previously disclosed. Proper prosecution and vigilant monitoring are essential.


References

  1. Official Patent JP2021105006 Document.
  2. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Patent Database.
  3. WIPO Patent Scope Database.
  4. Prior art in pharmaceutical process patents (publications and patent filings).
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical manufacturing patents.

Note: For precise legal advice, consultation with a patent attorney is recommended. This analysis is based on publicly available information and standard patent practice insights.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.