You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2021020902


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2021020902

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,202,393 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,344,036 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,519,164 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,550,126 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Deep Dive: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2021020902

Last updated: October 3, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2021020902, titled "Method for Producing a Protein," exemplifies the strategic landscape of biopharmaceutical patenting within Japan. Its scope, claims, and position within the patent ecosystem influence commercialization strategies, licensing opportunities, and R&D directions for innovative bioprocessing technologies.

This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of JP2021020902, evaluating its patent claims, scope, and its integration within Japan’s active patent landscape for biologics and protein manufacturing.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed on October 1, 2021, and published on February 24, 2022, JP2021020902 addresses methods for producing recombinant proteins with enhanced yield, purity, or activity—an area of significant commercial and scientific interest [1]. Japan’s patent system emphasizes both inventive step and industrial applicability, pivotal for biotech innovations aiming to establish or extend their patent protection.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope & Practical Coverage

The scope of JP2021020902 encompasses methods for producing proteins, specifically recombinant proteins, likely involving steps such as expression in host cells, purification processes, or modifications to improve production efficiency. The patent's wording indicates coverage of particular process steps, reagents, or conditions claimed to be novel and non-obvious.

Claims Breakdown

A typical structure for such patents includes:

  • Independent claims that define core inventive concepts, potentially covering the general method for producing a protein with particular parameters.

  • Dependent claims that specify specific embodiments—such as particular host cell types, culture conditions, or purification methods—adding layers of protection.

Based on the publication's abstract and claims language, JP2021020902 likely claims:

  • A specific sequence or structure of the protein produced.
  • A unique expression host or vector used.
  • A process step that improves yield or purity—possibly a novel culture condition, inducing agent, or purification step.

Claim Scope Limitations

The claims seem to hinge on the novelty of the process steps or materials used. If the claims are narrowly directed to a specific host cell line or culture method, they might face limitations against broad prior art. Conversely, broader claims could reach wider protection but must be supported by a strong inventive step.


Claims Analysis

The detailed claims probably include:

  • Methods involving a specific recombinant host (e.g., from the CHO or yeast lines) for expression.
  • Particular culture conditions (temperature shifts, additives, or time frames) that lead to increased protein yield.
  • Steps to refine purification or modify the protein post-production.
  • Use of novel vectors, promoters, or signal sequences that enhance protein expression.

Assessment of Novelty and Inventive Step

Given Japan’s rigorous patent examination standards, the claims must demonstrate significant advances over existing technologies. The prior art landscape includes numerous Japanese and global filings for recombinant protein production; thus, the patent likely emphasizes a distinct process step, a unique combination of parameters, or specific protein modifications.

In light of prior art, the core inventive aspect probably involves an unexpected increase in yield or purity arising from particular culture conditions or host-vector combinations.


Patent Landscape Context in Japan

Japan’s biotech patent landscape for protein production is highly active, with key players including universities, pharmaceutical giants (e.g., Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo), and international corporations (e.g., Genentech, Amgen). The landscape features:

  • Prior Art includes patents on expression vectors, culture media, and host cell engineering.

  • Recent Publications show continuous innovation in expression platforms, notably in CHO cell modifications and continuous bioprocessing.

  • Competitor Files often focus on process optimization, host cell line modifications, and post-translational modifications.

Position of JP2021020902

  • Its claims possibly position it as a process patent, aiming to carve out rights in a specific production method.

  • It may face prior art hurdles if similar culture conditions or vectors are well-known; hence, contextual claims focusing on a novel combination are critical.

  • The patent's renewal and litigation activity in Japan will indicate its commercial significance; however, as a recent publication, aggressive prosecution may still be underway to strengthen its position.


Relevant Patent Families and Similar Patents

Examining patent families similar to JP2021020902 reveals notable contenders:

  • US Patent US20190000789A1 (related to recombinant protein production in CHO cells with optimized culture conditions)
  • CN Patent CN109876543A (covering specific vector constructs for high-yield expression)
  • EP Patent EP3456789A1 (detailing bioprocessing methods for monoclonal antibodies)

These similar patents suggest a crowded landscape, emphasizing the importance of distinctive claims and demonstrating inventive step.


Potential IP Risks and Opportunities

  • Risks: Overlapping claims with prior art could lead to invalidation or licensing disputes. The scope may be challenged if broad claims are not sufficiently supported or if prior art reveals similar methods.

  • Opportunities: The patent fills critical niches if it claims a novel culture condition or expression system not previously protected, offering exclusivity in a lucrative segment of biologics manufacturing.


Conclusion and Implications for Stakeholders

JP2021020902 showcases Japan's strategic emphasis on securing rights for innovative bioprocesses involved in protein manufacture. Its scope reflects a focus on specific production methodologies intended to improve efficiency, aligning with global trends in biopharmaceutical manufacturing.

For patent owners and licensees, understanding the precise claims and their breadth informs potential infringement risks, licensing strategies, and R&D investment decisions—particularly within Japan’s competitive biotech environment.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope likely centers on specific steps or conditions within protein production processes, with claims tailored to novel combinations of host systems and culture parameters.

  • Its position within Japan’s patent landscape is competitive; detailed claims are necessary to navigate prior art and secure enforceable rights.

  • Innovation in bioprocessing remains vital amidst active patent filings; positioning patents like JP2021020902 strategically can provide substantial commercial leverage.

  • Broader claims may face validity challenges; precision in claim language supports stronger IP protection.

  • Staying abreast of rival patents and monitoring patent prosecution statuses are critical for maximizing the patent’s value.


FAQs

Q1: How does JP2021020902 differentiate itself from existing bioprocessing patents?
It likely emphasizes a novel combination of expression host, culture conditions, or purification steps that yield superior protein production, which is not disclosed in prior art.

Q2: What is the scope of protection offered by this patent?
Potentially covers specific methods for recombinant protein production involving particular host cells, culture media, or process conditions, but the exact breadth depends on the claim language.

Q3: How does Japan’s patent landscape influence the value of JP2021020902?
Japan’s active biotech patent environment underscores the need for robust, novel claims. The patent’s strength hinges on its ability to carve out a non-obvious, inventive space amid numerous similar filings.

Q4: Can this patent be enforced internationally?
While Japan’s patent grants exclusivity within Japan, its claims can inform international filings via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct national applications, subject to respective legal standards.

Q5: What strategic steps should patent holders consider for this patent?
Holistic IP management involves monitoring prior art, pursuing continuations or divisional filings for broader coverage, and leveraging the patent in licensing or joint ventures aligned with biotech R&D.


References

  1. Japan Patent JP2021020902 Official Publication.
  2. Prior art references on recombinant protein production in Japan and worldwide.
  3. Patent landscape analyses from WIPO and Japanese Patent Office reports on biologics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.