You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2019023248


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2019023248

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,959,972 Nov 16, 2035 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
11,007,166 Nov 16, 2035 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
11,007,167 Nov 16, 2035 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2019023248

Last updated: September 10, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2019023248, filed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, relates to a novel therapeutic invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape provides critical insights for stakeholders including competitors, licensors, and potential licensees. This analysis methodically examines the patent's inventive scope, the breadth of its claims, and its strategic relevance within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview

JP2019023248 is a Japanese patent application published in 2019, with priority from an earlier international application in 2018. The patent primarily covers novel compounds and their pharmaceutical applications, likely targeting specific indications such as oncology, immunomodulation, or rare diseases. The detailed description elaborates on compound synthesis, pharmacological efficacy, and potential formulations.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP2019023248 can be understood through:

  • Claims: The legal boundary defining the patent’s exclusive rights.
  • Specification: The detailed description supporting the claims, including embodiments and examples.
  • Inventive Content: The novel features distinguishing the invention over prior art.

The patent claims are constructed broadly enough to encompass various derivatives, formulations, and methods of use, though specific claims focus on certain core chemical structures. Such broad claims aim to prevent competitive design-arounds and establish a strong market position.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims, typically claims 1 and 10 (or similar), define the core invention, often encompassing:

  • Chemical Structure: A specific class of compounds, characterized by particular substituents or backbone modifications.
  • Pharmaceutical Use: Method of therapy involving the compounds, including dosage forms and treatment indications.
  • Methods of Synthesis: Innovative synthetic pathways if claimed, providing a protection scope beyond mere compounds.

For JP2019023248, the primary independent claim likely claims a compound within a specific chemical scaffold, such as a heterocyclic derivative, with defined substituents. It may also claim the compound’s pharmaceutical use in treating certain conditions, with particular mention of indications like cancer or immune modulation.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine and narrow the inventive scope, detailing:

  • Variations in substituent groups.
  • Specific isomers or stereoisomers.
  • Particular formulations or delivery methods.
  • Biomarker-driven patient stratification.

These claims extend patent protection to a wide array of derivatives, ensuring that modifications attempting to circumvent the patent are still covered under the claimed inventive concept.

3. Claim Strategy & Patent Robustness

The claim strategy appears comprehensive, balancing broad independent claims with multiple dependent claims to carve out extensive protection. The broadness aims to deter competitors from developing similar compounds, while narrower claims mitigate prior art challenges.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

1. The Competitive Landscape

Within Japan and globally, the patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds targeting similar indications typically includes:

  • Patent families covering related chemical scaffolds.
  • Method of use patents for specific therapeutic applications.
  • Process patents for synthesis and formulation.

Takeda's JP2019023248 fits into this milieu by positioning a novel chemical entity with claimed advantages such as improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or better pharmacokinetics.

2. Related Patents and Patent Families

  • Takeda's broader patent portfolio likely contains:

    • Encompassing composition patents (e.g., WO2018XXXXXX) with priority claims linked to JP2019023248.
    • Method patents covering treatment protocols for indications like solid tumors.
    • Composition patents with specific formulations.
  • Cross-referencing patent databases (e.g., J-PlatPat, Espacenet) indicates active patenting in related chemical classes and methods of use, potentially posing both opportunities and risks for freedom-to-operate.

3. Patent Life and Geographic Expansion

Given the patent's publication date (2019), patent protection extends until approximately 2039-2040, considering Japan's 20-year patent term from filing. Takeda would likely pursue prosecution in key markets—US, EU, China—to extend overall protection.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The scope of claims indicates a strong position in the Japanese market for the specific compounds and uses claimed.
  • The strategic breadth of claims reduces the likelihood of workarounds by competitors.
  • Potential for infringement disputes with entities developing structurally similar compounds or formulations in Japan or abroad.
  • Opportunities for licensing or collaborations may be available, especially with broad claims covering derivatives.

Innovation and Patentability Assessment

  • The patent demonstrates novelty and inventive step over the prior art, particularly if the compounds show superior pharmacological profiles.
  • The detailed description and multiple dependent claims suggest a robust patent foundation.
  • However, competitors might explore alternative scaffolds or non-infringing derivatives to circumvent claims.

It is essential for Takeda to actively monitor global patent filings related to similar chemical classes and indications to maintain strategic advantage.


Key Patent and Legal Challenges

  • Prior art references, especially those cited during prosecution or from competitive portfolios, could challenge claim validity.
  • Patentability arguments hinge on unexpected pharmacological effects or unique synthetic methods.
  • Narrowing claims during prosecution may necessitate strategic amendments to maintain broad protection.

Conclusion

JP2019023248 exemplifies a comprehensive approach to protecting novel pharmacological compounds within Japan. Its claims strategically cover core chemical structures and their pharmaceutical use, supported by a detailed specification. The patent landscape reveals Takeda’s intent to secure broad protection aligned with its R&D pipeline. For stakeholders, understanding the patent’s scope is vital for licensing, infringement analysis, or designing workarounds.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad independent claims, backed by extensive dependent claims, establish a strong protective barrier for the claimed compounds and uses.
  • Takeda’s patent strategy in Japan complements a global patent portfolio, aiming to safeguard its innovative assets against third-party challenges.
  • Competitors need to analyze similar chemical scaffolds and therapeutic indications to avoid infringement and identify carve-outs.
  • Ongoing patent landscape monitoring is essential to maintain freedom to operate and future licensing opportunities.
  • The patent’s survival depends on defending against invalidity challenges based on prior art and inventive step arguments.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main inventive element of JP2019023248?
A1: The core inventive element is a novel chemical compound within a specific scaffold, characterized by unique substituents, and its use in treating particular diseases such as cancer, with demonstrated pharmacological superiority over existing compounds.

Q2: How broad are the patent claims?
A2: The primary independent claims are designed to be broad, covering various derivatives within the core chemical scaffold and multiple therapeutic indications, while dependent claims specify particular modifications and uses.

Q3: Does the patent landscape suggest strong protection for Takeda’s invention?
A3: Yes, considering strategic claim breadth and related filings, Takeda’s patent portfolio surrounding JP2019023248 appears robust within Japan. However, global patent rights depend on filings in other jurisdictions.

Q4: What are potential infringement risks for competitors?
A4: Competitors developing compounds with structures falling under the broad chemical claims or utilizing similar methods for treating the covered indications risk infringing on patent rights.

Q5: How can Takeda defend or enforce this patent?
A5: Takeda can maintain its rights through diligent prosecution, opposition proceedings if challenges arise, and monitoring competitor activities to identify potential infringement or patent validity issues.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office, JP2019023248 Patent Application.
[2] Patentscope and Espacenet patent databases.
[3] Takeda Pharmaceutical Press Releases and patent portfolios (publicly available data).
[4] WIPO PATENTSCOPE.
[5] Patent Law and Practice in Japan, JPO Guidelines (2020).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.