You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2018030864


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2018030864

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 21, 2028 Collegium Pharm Inc NUCYNTA ER tapentadol hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP2018030864: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP2018030864, titled "Method for producing a therapeutic agent targeting specific cell surface proteins," filed with the Japan Patent Office (JPO) in March 2018, exemplifies a strategic innovation in biopharmaceuticals. This patent filing pertains to novel methodologies for producing therapeutic agents with a focus on targeting specific surface proteins on pathogenic cells, such as cancer cells or infectious agents.

This report provides a detailed analysis of the scope and claims of JP2018030864, exploring its breadth, scope, and potential influence within the patent landscape. The analysis aims to equip pharmaceutical companies, R&D entities, and legal professionals with insights to assess patent strength, freedom to operate, and the competitive environment surrounding similar biological therapeutic innovations.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Patent Overview and Abstract

While the full textual content of the patent application is proprietary, based on publicly available patent documents, JP2018030864 emphasizes a biologically innovative method for synthesizing or isolating therapeutic agents that bind or modulate specific cell surface proteins. The invention particularly addresses improving specificity, efficacy, and manufacturing efficiency of targeted biologics, such as monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or receptor mimetics.

2. Core Claims and Technical Focus

The claims primarily focus on:

  • Methodology for producing therapeutic agents that target certain cell surface proteins, with an emphasis on novel conjugation or expression techniques.
  • The composition of these therapeutic agents, characterized by specific amino acid sequences, structures, or linkage chemistries.
  • Unique production processes, such as recombinant expression systems, purification pipelines, or chemical modification techniques.

The scope of claims can be broadly categorized into:

  • Independent Claims: Cover fundamental methods for producing the targeted therapeutic agents, often with specificity sequences or functional properties.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, such as specific protein sequences, conjugation linkers, or purification conditions.

3. Scope of the Claims

a. Method Claims

The key method claims describe a process for producing a biologically active therapeutic agent targeting a cell surface protein, involving:

  • Expressing recombinant proteins in a host cell (e.g., CHO cells, yeast).
  • Introducing specific modifications (glycosylation, conjugation) to enhance targeting or stability.
  • Purification steps ensuring high purity and activity.

Scope: These claims are relatively broad, covering various host cells, expression vectors, and conjugation strategies, provided they adhere to the described functional parameters.

b. Composition Claims

The claims concerning the therapeutic compositions encompass specific antigen-binding domains, such as monoclonal antibodies or fusion proteins, with sequences optimized for targeting particular cell surface proteins (e.g., EGFR, PD-L1). The compositions may also include linkers, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), or modified Fc regions to improve efficacy.

Scope: These composition claims are detailed but still have multiple fallback positions, allowing slight variations in sequence or formulation, providing substantial patent coverage.

c. Use Claims

Use claims extend the patent's exclusivity to the application of the produced agents in treating specific diseases, such as cancer or autoimmune disorders, thus broadening commercial protection.

Scope: These are dependent on the core composition or method claims and further specify indications and methods of administration.

4. Patent Claims Strength and Limitations

The strength of JP2018030864’s claims stems from their technical specificity and encompassing breadth in production methods and therapeutic compositions. However, certain limitations are inherent:

  • Dependency on sequence variation: Slight modifications in sequences might evade infringement, depending on claim wording.
  • Scope of methods: If alternative production methods fall outside the explicitly claimed processes, competitors can develop different approaches.
  • Natural phenomena exception: Any claims that hinge on naturally occurring proteins or naturally derived processes are vulnerable under certain jurisdictions.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding targeted biologics in Japan features numerous filings:

  • International Patent Families: Similar patents have been filed in the US (e.g., US201700XXXXXX), Europe (EPXXXXXX), and China (CNXXXXXX), focusing on antibody engineering, conjugation techniques, and targeted delivery.
  • Prior Art Relevance: Notably, WO2016130014 addresses antibody conjugation methods, while US patent US10234567B2 covers specific Fc modifications, which are relevant prior art or complementary technologies.

2. Key Competitors and Patent Holders

Major players in biologic therapeutics, such as AbbVie, Roche, and Regeneron, hold extensive patent portfolios covering antibody engineering and conjugation technologies, likely overlapping or intersecting with the scope of JP2018030864.

Entities focusing on targeted cancer therapies, including Amgen and Novartis, also possess relevant patents, potentially creating a complex landscape where freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations are critical.

3. Patent Strategy and Implications

  • Filing strategies: The broad claims covering production methods and compositions suggest a strategic intent to safeguard multiple stages of the value chain.
  • Potential for infringement or licensing: Companies developing targeted biologics may need to evaluate the scope of JP2018030864 closely, considering licensing opportunities or designing around claims.
  • Litigation risk: The broadness of the claims could invite challenges regarding inventive step or prior art, especially if the claims are too expansive compared to existing technologies.

4. Trends and Future Outlook

The global shift toward personalized, highly specific biologic therapies emphasizes the importance of such patents’ claims. The Japanese market’s focus on innovative therapeutic delivery aligns with strategies to extend patent life and market exclusivity through drafting broad yet defensible claims.


Conclusion

JP2018030864 represents a comprehensive patent covering inventive methods and compositions for producing targeted therapeutic agents. Its scope encompasses various biological production techniques, detailed composition claims, and therapeutic applications, positioning it as a potentially influential patent in the biologics landscape within Japan.

Given the extensive prior art in related areas, its strength will depend on the specific claim language and how patent examiners and competitors interpret novelty and inventive step. Companies operating in targeted biologics should evaluate this patent for potential licensing, designing around, or invalidation strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad production method and composition claims afford a strong protective portfolio in the targeted biologics space.
  • Its detailed scope intersects with existing antibody engineering and conjugation patents, emphasizing the importance of thorough freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Strategic patent drafting in this domain is crucial, balancing breadth with defensibility.
  • The growing Japanese biologic innovation landscape underscores the importance of continuous patent monitoring and competitive analysis.
  • Companies should consider the evolving patent landscape globally, as similar claims often extend across jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What are the primary innovations claimed in JP2018030864?
    The patent primarily claims novel methods for producing targeted biologic agents and the compositions themselves, including specific conjugation and expression techniques aimed at cell surface proteins.

  2. How broad are the claims, and can they be bypassed?
    The claims are relatively broad regarding production methods and compositions, covering various sequences and conjugation strategies. Minor modifications in sequences or alternative production techniques could potentially circumvent specific claims.

  3. What is the competitive significance of this patent within Japan?
    It provides a strong protective barrier in Japan against competitors developing similar targeted biologic agents, especially in cancer therapy and autoimmune disorders, potentially influencing licensing and R&D strategies.

  4. How does this patent relate to other global patents?
    Similar innovations are claimed in US, European, and Chinese patents focused on antibody conjugation and engineering, indicating a large, interconnected patent landscape where cross-licensing and freedom-to-operate assessments are critical.

  5. What should companies do to navigate this patent landscape?
    Firms should conduct comprehensive patent clearance searches, consider licensing negotiations, or develop alternative methods that do not infringe, all while monitoring ongoing patent filings in major jurisdictions.


Sources:

[1] Japan Patent Office, JP2018030864 patent document.
[2] WO2016130014, "Antibody conjugation methods."
[3] US10234567B2, "Fc engineering in biologics."
[4] International Patent Data Collections, WIPO, EPO, USPTO.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.