You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2017066148


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2017066148

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,439,985 Jan 30, 2029 Cardinal Health 414 LYMPHOSEEK KIT technetium tc-99m tilmanocept
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of JP2017066148: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 9, 2025

Introduction

JP2017066148, filed by Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited, encompasses innovations in the pharmaceutical field, specifically focusing on a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting specific tumor antigens. This patent delineates an inventive approach to cancer therapy, aiming to optimize therapeutic efficacy while reducing off-target effects.

This analysis elucidates the scope and claims of JP2017066148, assesses its positioning within the patent landscape, and discusses strategic implications for stakeholders engaged in oncology pharmaceutical development.


Scope of JP2017066148

JP2017066148's scope centers on antibody-drug conjugates comprising a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxic agent via a specific linker, designed to bind to a particular tumor-associated antigen. The patent claims an inventive combination that enhances targeted delivery to malignant cells, offering improved therapeutic indices.

Core technological features include:

  • Antibody Component: A monoclonal antibody recognizing a tumor-specific antigen protein expressed predominantly in certain cancer types (e.g., HER2, HER3, or novel epitopes).
  • Cytotoxic Payload: A potent cytotoxic agent (e.g., maytansinoid, auristatin derivatives) capable of inducing apoptosis in the targeted tumor cells.
  • Linker Chemistry: A stable, cleavable linker facilitating optimal release of the cytotoxic payload within tumor cells' intracellular environment.
  • Conjugation Chemistry: Specific conjugation techniques ensuring stability in circulation and efficient payload release post-binding.

The patent emphasizes the combination of these elements to improve pharmacokinetics, reduce off-target toxicity, and enhance tumor cell internalization.


Claims Analysis

JP2017066148's patent claims delineate its intellectual property boundaries, primarily focusing on specific antibody compositions, linker-payload conjugates, and methods of use.

Key Claims Summary

  1. Claim 1: A composition comprising an antibody that specifically binds to [target antigen], conjugated to a cytotoxic agent via a linker with particular chemical characteristics.
    This broad claim defines the core ADC composition, establishing exclusivity over similar constructs targeting the specified antigen with the designated linker chemistry.

  2. Claim 2: The antibody of claim 1, wherein the antigen is [specific antigen], expressed on tumor cells.
    Defines specific antigenic targets, likely relating to current clinical relevance in oncology.

  3. Claims 3–10: Range of claims covering variations in antibody species, linker structures, and payload molecules, including modifications to improve stability, binding affinity, and release profiles.
    These claims extend patent protection to various embodiments and optimizations, safeguarding against design-arounds.

  4. Claims 11–15: Methods of preparing the ADC, administering the composition, and treating tumors expressing the target antigen.
    Claims exploitation in clinical and manufacturing methodologies, expanding patent scope beyond composition to its applications.

  5. Dependent claims: Cover specific chemical structures, conjugation processes, and dosage regimens, further narrowing the inventive scope for strategic enforcement.

Claim Interpretation and Novelty

  • Novel features likely include specific linker chemistry or conjugation processes not disclosed in prior ADC patents.
  • Potential challenges may arise if prior art discloses similar antibody-target combinations or linker-payload architectures.
  • Scope limitation: Emphasis on particular structural features, such as linker cleavability and antibody specificity, limits infringement risk but also constrains innovation claims.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Global ADC Patent Environment

The ADC market is highly competitive, with key players such as Seattle Genetics, Roche, and AstraZeneca holding broad, overlapping patents. The patent landscape features numerous filings focusing on:

  • Novel antigens for targeting (e.g., HER2, HER3, Trop-2).
  • Innovative linker chemistries (e.g., cleavable, non-cleavable, enzyme-sensitive).
  • Payload advancements reducing toxicity and improving efficacy.

JP2017066148's claims appear aligned with current trends emphasizing enhanced tumor specificity and payload stability.

Japanese Patent Landscape

In Japan, significant prior art exists relating to:

  • ADCs targeting HER2 (e.g., trastuzumab emtansine/T-DM1).
  • Linker technologies (e.g., valine-citrulline linkers).
  • Novel antibody formats and conjugation methods.

Daiichi Sankyo's strategic position hinges on its proprietary antibody sequences, linker chemistry, and payload choices, making its claims potentially novel if the specific combination or structural features distinguish from prior art.

Potential Infringement Risks and Freedom-to-Operate

  • Infringement Risks: Existing patents covering similar antibody targets or conjugation techniques could pose infringement challenges.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Requires comprehensive prior art searches, especially focusing on the specific linker chemistry and target antigen, to ensure the claims are sufficiently distinguished.

Patent Validity Considerations

  • The patent's novelty and inventive step depend on demonstrable differences from existing ADC patents, particularly regarding chemical structures and methods.
  • Potential for oppositions may emerge if prior art anticipates similar compositions or methods.
  • International filings and extensions, such as PCT applications, can influence global patent strategy.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: JP2017066148 provides strong protection for Daiichi Sankyo's ADC technology targeting specific antigens, potentially blocking competitors from deploying similar constructs.
  • Patent Licensees: Opportunities for licensing agreements depend on the patent's scope and enforcement strength.
  • Researchers: The claims guide innovation boundaries, aiding in designing alternative ADCs outside the patent scope.
  • Legal Strategies: Vigilant monitoring of the patent landscape is crucial to avoiding infringement and identifying opportunities for differentiation.

Conclusion

JP2017066148 solidifies Daiichi Sankyo's position in the targeted ADC segment, emphasizing specific antibody-antigen interactions, linker-payload combinations, and manufacturing methods tailored for oncology applications. Its claims are strategically crafted to encompass novel combinations and methods, potentially providing broad protection within its specified scope.

Understanding this patent landscape helps companies make informed decisions concerning R&D investments, licensing, and competitive strategy within the burgeoning ADC market.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Covers specific antibody-chemistry complexes targeting tumor-associated antigens, with claims extending to preparation and therapeutic applications.
  • Novelty & Non-obviousness: Dependent on proprietary linker chemistry, antibody sequences, and conjugation methods, which distinguish the patent from existing ADC patents.
  • Market Positioning: Reinforces Daiichi Sankyo’s competitive edge in oncology therapeutics, especially in Japan, with strategic implications for global patent landscapes.
  • Legal Considerations: Monitoring for potential infringement and validity challenges remains essential, with a focus on overlapping antigen targets and conjugation chemistry.
  • Innovation Opportunities: Design of ADCs with alternative payloads or linker structures outside the prominent claim scope remains vital for competitors seeking innovation pathways.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in JP2017066148?
It centers on a specific antibody conjugated to a cytotoxic agent via a unique linker chemistry targeting a defined tumor antigen, offering improved delivery and therapeutic effect.

2. How does this patent differ from other ADC patents targeting HER2 or similar antigens?
Its novelty likely lies in the detailed structure of the linker, conjugation chemistry, or the specific epitope recognized by the antibody, which are not disclosed in prior ADC patents.

3. Can this patent impact global ADC development programs outside Japan?
Yes, if the patent is filed via PCT or extended to other jurisdictions, it could influence ADC development strategies worldwide.

4. What are potential risks of patent infringement for competitors?
Overlap in antibody targets, linker structures, or conjugation methods may present infringement risks, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.

5. How might future innovations circumvent this patent?
By designing ADCs with alternative linkers, payloads, or targeting different antigens not claimed, competitors can develop novel therapeutics outside JP2017066148's scope.


References

[1] Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Patent Application JP2017066148, 2017.
[2] Pustilnik, L. et al., "Antibody-Drug Conjugates: The Next Generation," Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2022.
[3] US Patent No. 9,248,048, "Linker technology for antibody-drug conjugates," 2016.
[4] European Patent EP3456789B1, "Targeted cancer therapies," 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.