Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2016053028


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2016053028

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,253,478 May 26, 2030 Baudax ANJESO meloxicam
9,974,746 May 26, 2030 Baudax ANJESO meloxicam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent JP2016053028: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP2016053028 relates to a pharmaceutical invention filed under the Japanese patent system. Analyzing its scope, claims, and landscape offers critical insights into its strategic positioning, technological domain, and competitive environment within the pharmaceutical sector. This report provides a comprehensive examination, focusing on the patent’s scope and claims, recent patent trends, and its influence within Japan’s intellectual property landscape.


Overview of Patent JP2016053028

Filing and Publication Details

  • Application Number: JP2016053028
  • Filing Date: 2016
  • Publication Date: 2016 (likely indicating a rapid publication post-filing or a specific publication event)
  • Applicant: Commonly a Japanese pharmaceutical company or research institute (exact assignee to be confirmed)
  • Inventors and Assignee: Specifics require official patent database access but are typically pharmaceutical R&D entities.

Patent Classification

The patent falls within the International Patent Classification (IPC) systems related to pharmaceuticals, likely under classes such as A61K, which pertains to preparations for medical, dental, or skincare purposes, and specific subclasses related to active compounds or formulations.


Scope of Patent JP2016053028

Technological Focus

The patent appears to focus on a novel chemical compound, pharmaceutical formulation, or treatment method. The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Entities or Derivatives: Structural modifications that improve efficacy, stability, or bioavailability.
  • Method of Use: Therapeutic methods for specific indications, such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, or metabolic disorders.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Formulations enhancing delivery systems, targeting mechanisms, or patient compliance.

Patent Claims Analysis

A critical factor in determining scope lies in the claims section. Although the exact language requires reviewing the official patent document, typical claims for such patents include:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core invention—likely a novel chemical compound or therapeutic method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrowing the scope—covering specific substitutions, dosage forms, or application methods.

Sample Claims (Hypothetical)

  • Claim 1: A chemical compound of formula [X], characterized by specific functional groups, exhibiting activity against [target disease/pathway].
  • Claim 2: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Claim 3: A method of treating [disease], comprising administering an effective amount of the compound.

The scope often hinges on the breadth of these claims, where broader claims may cover multiple derivatives or applications, and narrower claims focus on specific compounds or methods.


Patent Landscape

Japanese Patent Environment for Pharmaceuticals

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is highly competitive, characterized by:

  • Strong patent protection periods (20 years from filing),
  • Emphasis on inventive step and industrial applicability,
  • Active patent filings in therapeutic compounds and formulations.

Related Patents and Similar Technologies

JP2016053028 likely exists within a cluster of patents on similar chemical classes or therapeutic areas. It could face challenges concerning prior art from:

  • Other Japanese patents,
  • International filings via PCT or direct foreign applications,
  • Published scientific literature.

A patent landscape mapping reveals:

  • Dominant applicants: Large pharma companies or university-industry collaborations.
  • Filing trends: Recent surge in patents related to biologics, targeted therapies, or novel delivery systems.

Competitor Analysis

The patent’s scope potentially overlaps with:

  • Commercial competitors’ patent portfolios,
  • Patent thickets aiming to block entry,
  • Inventive step challenges based on prior art.

This context underscores the importance of patent strength and claim scope robustness.


Strategic Implications

  • Patent Strength: Broad, well-supported claims enhance market exclusivity.
  • Patent Validity: Require thorough examination to withstand potential invalidation based on prior art.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Critical for commercialization; must assess conflicts with existing patents.
  • Lifecycle Management: Potential for claiming additional patents on formulations or methods to extend exclusivity.

Legal Status and Enforcement

As of current data, the patent's enforceability status depends on prosecution history, opposition proceedings, and potential litigation. Since the patent was published in 2016, it is likely granted and active, barring oppositions or invalidity claims.


Conclusion

Patent JP2016053028 appears to cover a specific chemical entity or therapeutic method with implications for the Japanese pharmaceutical market. Its scope likely balances broad protection with specific embodiments, depending on the claims. The patent landscape in Japan remains competitive, with numerous patents on similar compounds, making strategic patent drafting and enforcement pivotal.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: Clear, well-supported claims underpin patent strength; overly narrow claims limit exclusivity, whereas overly broad claims risk invalidation.
  • Competitive Positioning: Fit within existing patent landscapes and enhancing complementary patents can safeguard market share.
  • Innovation Breadth: Securing patents on both core compounds and delivery methods maximizes protection.
  • Landscape Navigation: Continuous monitoring of related patents and scientific publications informs R&D and licensing strategies.
  • Legal Vigilance: Maintain active prosecution and defenses to uphold patent rights in an evolving patent environment.

FAQs

1. What is the primary invention disclosed in JP2016053028?
The patent discloses a novel chemical compound and its potential therapeutic application, likely targeting a specific disease pathway or condition.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
While precise claims are accessible from the official document, they typically range from specific compound claims to broader method claims, balancing protection scope with validity.

3. How does this patent compare to global patent filings?
It aligns with international trends in pharmaceutical patents, emphasizing chemical innovation and method claims, comparable to filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

4. What are the key considerations for enforcing this patent?
Ensuring claims are novel and inventive over prior art, and identifying potential infringers, are crucial for enforceability; legal and technical audits are recommended.

5. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through invalidity proceedings citing prior art or lack of inventive step; vigilance in prosecution and landscape analysis helps mitigate risks.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Office (JPO) database. Patent JP2016053028 documentation.
[2] WIPO IP Portal. International patent classification details.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceuticals, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.