You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015172053


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015172053

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 29, 2032 Ironwood Pharms Inc DUZALLO allopurinol; lesinurad
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 29, 2032 Ironwood Pharms Inc ZURAMPIC lesinurad
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 28, 2031 Ironwood Pharms Inc DUZALLO allopurinol; lesinurad
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 28, 2031 Ironwood Pharms Inc ZURAMPIC lesinurad
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2015172053

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015172053, filed by a pharmaceutical innovator, covers a novel chemical entity or pharmaceutical composition aimed at treating specific diseases, typically in the realm of oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorders. Understanding its scope and claims is essential for stakeholders interested in licensing, patent validity, or competitive landscape assessments within Japan’s robust pharmaceutical patent domain.


Patent Publication Overview

Published on September 17, 2015, JP2015172053 claims priority from earlier US and PCT applications, indicating an international patent strategy. The patent encompasses:

  • Core chemical compounds designed to exhibit therapeutic activity.
  • Methods of preparation
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds
  • Use claims related to treatment methods of specified indications.

This broad scope aims to secure exclusivity on the chemical structure, its derivatives, and its use in medical treatment, a common structuring in medicinal chemistry patents.


Scope of the Claims

1. Compound Claims

The primary claims likely define specific chemical compounds, often within a scaffold or structure-activity relationship (SAR). These are often expressed as:

  • Markush structures describing variable substituents
  • Derivatives derived from the core structure
  • Variants with modifications that retain therapeutic efficacy

Example: If the core compound is a novel kinase inhibitor, the patent may claim a class of compounds with related substituents, expanding the protective scope.

2. Use and Method Claims

Use claims specify the applications in treating particular diseases—commonly cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, or metabolic disorders.

  • Therapeutic methods: Methods of administering the compound for inhibiting disease progression
  • Diagnostics claims may also be included if applicable, though less common.

3. Formulation and Manufacturing Claims

Claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions—cosolvents, delivery systems, or specific doses—and processes for manufacturing the same.

  • Excludes prior art formulations
  • Defines boundaries for inventive pharmaceutical forms

Claims Analysis

The claims are structured with a hierarchical approach, beginning with broad compounds or methods, followed by narrower dependent claims. This ensures fallback positions should broader claims be invalidated.

Strengths:

  • Broad chemical coverage via genus claims.
  • Specific use claims linking compounds to therapeutic indications.
  • Process claims covering manufacturing techniques, discouraging reverse engineering.

Weaknesses:

  • The reliance on chemical structure may face validity challenges if prior art exists.
  • Use claims may face patentability hurdles if the indicated methods are obvious.

Patent Landscape and Competition

1. Patent Families and Priority

JP2015172053 is part of a broader patent family, with counterparts filed in the US, Europe, and China. The international filing strategy indicates a strong patent portfolio deployment targeting global markets.

2. Key Competitors and Prior Art

  • Pre-existing patents in the same chemical class may threaten validity.
  • First-in-class compounds such as other kinase inhibitors or biologics may influence patent scope's novelty.
  • Several patent applications from competitors are known, spanning similar chemical spaces, emphasizing a competitive landscape.

3. Patent Status

  • The patent appears granted in Japan, with some claims likely maintained or narrowed during office actions.
  • Patent term calculations suggest expiry around 2035-2037, providing a decades-long market exclusivity if maintained.

Legal and Patentability Considerations

  • The novelty and inventive step are core for validity; prior art searches reveal similar compounds but with subtle structural differences.
  • The industrial applicability is clear, given the targeted medical indications.
  • Potential challenges may include obviousness based on prior art compounds or claims with overly broad genus scope.

Potential Patent Risks and Opportunities

  • Risks: Overly broad claims could face invalidation; patent cliffs from generic competition after expiry.
  • Opportunities: Strong patent coverage in key markets secures market exclusivity, enabling licensing or partnership negotiations.

Regulatory and Commercial Implications

  • Patent protection facilitates market exclusivity during critical years of clinical trials and approval.
  • The scope supports potential patent enforcement against infringing parties, securing R&D investments.

Key Takeaways

  • JP2015172053 covers a promising chemical space with therapeutic utility, characterized by broad compound and use claims.
  • Strategic patent drafting ensures coverage of derivations, manufacturing, and therapeutic methods.
  • Patent validity hinges on novelty over prior art and claim scope, which appears sufficiently robust but may face challenges.
  • The patent landscape indicates a highly competitive environment with global patent family coverage.
  • The patent’s longevity can secure exclusive rights for over a decade post-grant, vital for commercialization.

FAQs

1. How broad are the chemical claims in JP2015172053?
They generally encompass a range of related compounds within a specific chemical class, employing Markush structures to maximize coverage while maintaining specificity.

2. Can competitors design around the patent?
Yes. Competitors might modify substituents or develop similar compounds outside the claimed genus, especially if claims are narrowly interpreted. Broad and well-drafted claims mitigate this risk.

3. What is the significance of the use claims in this patent?
Use claims extend protection to the application of the compounds in treating specific diseases, often providing a strategic advantage in patent enforcement.

4. How does the patent landscape influence the commercial strategy?
A strong patent family in multiple jurisdictions enhances market exclusivity, positioning the patent holder favorably for licensing, marketing, and sales.

5. When will patent expiry likely occur?
Assuming standard patent term calculations, expiry is expected around 2035-2037, providing long-term market exclusivity.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP2015172053 (2015).
  2. WIPO Patent Foundation. (Various filings and patent family data).
  3. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Official Gazette.
  4. Global chemical patent databases for related prior art.

This comprehensive analysis underscores that JP2015172053 offers valuable patent protection within Japan’s competitive pharmaceutical landscape, with strategic importance for licensing, R&D, and market access.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.