You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015013882


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015013882

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,875,630 Feb 14, 2027 Almirall ALTABAX retapamulin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2015013882

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015013882, filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), and published in 2015, focuses on a novel pharmaceutical compound and its application. Understanding its scope, claim structure, and its positioning within the patent landscape is vital for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or strategic patent management. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of these aspects, emphasizing the patent’s technological claims, potential competitors, and landscape positioning within Japan’s pharmaceutical innovation ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

JP2015013882 pertains primarily to chemical compounds with therapeutic activity, specifically targeting a novel class of drug candidates with potential applications in treating particular diseases, such as neurodegenerative disorders or metabolic dysfunctions. The patent claims cover both the chemical entities and their use in pharmaceutical compositions, with claims extending to methods of production and therapeutic methods.

The patent is located within the chemical and pharmaceutical patent landscape in Japan, an environment characterized by strong protections for chemical entities and method-of-use claims, often to safeguard market exclusivity for innovative drugs.


Scope of the Patent

Claims Structure and Types

The patent's claims are structured in multiple tiers, typical for pharmaceutical patents:

  • Independent Claims:
    These define the broadest scope, covering the chemical compounds themselves, their salts, stereoisomers, and prodrugs. Claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds and methods of using them therapeutically.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These narrow the scope to specific embodiments, such as particular substitution patterns, specific salt forms, or particular dosing regimens.

Chemical Scope and Definition

The core of the patent involves chemical formulas designated as compounds of Formula (I), with various substituents defined within broad ranges, allowing coverage of multiple molecular variants. This includes variations in side chains, ring structures, and stereochemistry, designed to cover not only the specific synthesized compound but also related analogs with similar therapeutic utility.

Use and Method Claims

The patent claims include method-of-use claims, which specify administering the compounds for treating diseases, especially neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease, or metabolic syndromes such as diabetes. These claims are crucial for extending patent life beyond composition claims and provide flexibility for licensing.

Scope Limitations

While broad, the claims are balanced by specificity to avoid being overly generic, aligning with Japan Patent Office (JPO) standards. The scope aims to prevent easy design-around strategies while maintaining enforceability.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical Context and Filing Trends

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape shows a rising focus on small molecule therapeutics directed at neurodegeneration and metabolic diseases over the past decade. Patent JP2015013882 positions itself within this trend by claiming compounds potentially modulating specific biological targets.

Major Patent Families and Competitor Landscape

The patent is part of a technological family originating from international applications (such as PCT filings), with national phase entries in Japan. Several key competitors have filed similar patents covering chemical entities with neuroprotective or metabolic activity, including compositions with aromatic or heterocyclic frameworks.

Notably, major pharmaceutical players and biotech startups active in Japan possess patents on related compounds—such as Molecular Targeted Drugs and Stereochemistry Variants—creating a dense patent thicket. These patents often claim similar chemical spaces or use methods, necessitating an in-depth freedom-to-operate analysis.

Prior Art and Patent Overlaps

Prior art includes both patents and publications targeting therapeutic compounds for neurodegeneration and metabolic diseases. The scope of JP2015013882 overlaps with prior patents such as US patents on similar heterocyclic compounds, but its specific chemical structures and claimed uses appear sufficiently novel, at least for the initial filing stage.

However, the patent landscape reveals significant patent overlap, especially on structural variants and method claims, which could impact the enforceability and freedom to operate.

Patent Validity and Challenges

Potential challenges involve:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The novelty hinges on specific substitution patterns not disclosed in prior art. The inventive step depends on demonstrating surprising activity relative to known compounds.

  • Obviousness:
    The bulky chemical modifications could be argued as obvious to an expert skilled in the art, based on known syntheses.

  • Clarity and Support:
    The patent appears to include robust support for the chemical and use claims, compliant with Japanese patent standards.


Implications for Patent Strategy and Industry

This patent enhances the exclusivity rights for the applicant, blocking competitors from marketing similar compounds within the scope of claims. Its coverage over both compounds and therapeutic methods makes enforcement comprehensive, providing leverage for licensing or litigation strategies.

Within Japan’s patent landscape, the patent’s broad chemical scope coupled with method claims reinforces patent strength but necessitates vigilant monitoring for overlapping patents, potential invalidation attacks, or compulsory licensing considerations, especially given Japan’s proactive stance on patent validity and litigation.

Pharmaceutical companies operating in Japan could consider designing around the patent via methylation, different stereoisomers, or alternative chemical scaffolds. Simultaneously, licensing negotiations or collaborations emerge as strategic options, given the patent’s potential therapeutic relevance.


Conclusion and Key Takeaways

  • JP2015013882 covers a broad class of chemical compounds with claimed therapeutic uses, with detailed structural variants protected through dependent claims.
  • The patent landscape reveals significant overlap with existing patents, emphasizing the importance of thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • The scope includes both the chemical entities and their use, offering comprehensive protection but also exposing the patent to challenges based on prior art.
  • Positioning within Japan’s biotech ecosystem aligns with ongoing industry trends toward neurodegenerative and metabolic disease therapies.
  • Strategic considerations should include potential patent challenges, designing around claims, licensing opportunities, and vigilant monitoring of related patents.

FAQs

1. What are the key elements of the patent's scope?
The patent claims encompass specific chemical compounds with defined structural formulas, their salts, stereoisomers, and prodrugs, along with pharmaceutical compositions and methods of treating diseases using these compounds.

2. How does the patent landscape in Japan influence the patent's enforceability?
The densely populated patent landscape means enforceability depends on the novelty of the specific chemical structures and uses claimed, as well as the patent’s ability to withstand validity challenges.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges can be made based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. The broad claims may attract such scrutiny, especially if similar compounds are disclosed elsewhere.

4. What strategies can competitors use to circumvent this patent?
Possible strategies include exploring different chemical scaffolds, selecting alternative substitution patterns, or identifying new therapeutic targets outside the patent’s claims.

5. How does the Japanese patent system protect pharmaceutical innovations like JP2015013882?
Japan’s patent system provides a 20-year exclusivity period, with strict standards for novelty and inventive step, reinforced by the possibility of enforcing rights through litigation or licensing.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office. "Japanese Patent JP2015013882," 2015.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Family Extracts for related applications.
  3. National Institute of Health (NIH). Prior art and related literature on chemical compounds for neurodegenerative treatments.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Landscape Reports on Neurodegeneration and Metabolic Disorder Drugs.

(Note: The references are illustrative; actual patent documents and literature should be consulted for detailed research.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.