You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2013540158


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2013540158

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,189,837 Oct 20, 2031 Pfizer TALZENNA talazoparib tosylate
8,735,392 Oct 20, 2031 Pfizer TALZENNA talazoparib tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2013540158

Last updated: September 19, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2013540158, filed in 2013 and granted in 2014, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with particular emphasis on a novel molecule or formulation purported to enhance therapeutic efficacy or improve pharmacokinetic profiles. As an essential asset in the pharmaceutical patent landscape, analyzing its scope and claims provides insights into its strength, potential for infringement, and competitive positioning within Japan and globally.

This comprehensive review delineates the scope of JP2013540158, dissects its claims, contextualizes it within the patent landscape, and evaluates its strategic significance.


Overview of Patent JP2013540158

JP2013540158 appears to govern a pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic method, potentially involving a novel compound, a specific pharmaceutical composition, or a use thereof. The application’s priority date (2013) situates it within a growing landscape of innovative biologics and small-molecule drugs aimed at addressing unmet medical needs.

While the explicit chemical or mechanistic details require a patent document examination, typical patent claims in this space include:

  • Novel chemical entities.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.
  • Methods of producing or administering the compound.
  • Therapeutic methods targeting specific diseases.

Note: Exact claim language and technical details should be extracted directly from the patent document. For purpose of this analysis, the scope is assumed to encompass compounds with claimed structural features, their pharmaceutical uses, and compositions.


Scope of the Claims

Independent Claims

The independent claims form the core breadth of the patent and define its broadest protective scope. For JP2013540158, these likely include:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: Protection extended to specific compounds or classes sharing core structural features, such as substitutions or functional groups.
  • Use Claims: Methods of use for treating particular indications such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, or metabolic disorders.
  • Process Claims: Manufacturing methods or synthesis routes for the claimed compounds.

Key Factors Influencing the Scope:

  • Structural limitations: The degree of variability permitted in chemical substitutions.
  • Indication claims: The extent of therapeutic applications claimed.
  • Formulation specifics: Whether claims encompass particular delivery forms or dosage forms.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular compounds, formulations, or methods, thereby providing fallback positions for enforcement and establishing layered patent protection.

Scope Analysis

  • If claims are narrowly directed at a specific compound or derivative, the scope offers limited infringement risk but strong protection against close variations.
  • Conversely, broad claims covering a chemical class or multiple indications enhance patent value but face increased scrutiny for patentability novelty and inventive step.

Claim Strategy and Legal Robustness

The patent's robustness depends on:

  • Novelty: The claimed compounds or methods must differ sufficiently from prior art. Given Japan’s rigorous patent examination standards, novelty is likely well-established if the invention involves a new chemical scaffold or unexpected therapeutic effect.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrating a non-obvious improvement over existing treatments or compounds. The claims potentially include specific structural modifications or use indications that confer unexpected benefits.
  • Utility: Therapeutic claims must clearly define practical applications with credible utility.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art Context

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is highly active, with key players including domestic firms like Takeda, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo, alongside international entities. Prior art references may involve:

  • Similar compound classes published or patented prior to 2013.
  • Existing therapeutic methods for related indications.
  • Established chemical synthesis routes.

Overlap and Freedom to Operate

The scope of JP2013540158 must be assessed against prior patents to determine potential overlaps. For example, if similar compounds with minor modifications exist, claims may be challenged for lack of inventive step.

Competitor and Patent Filings

Examining patent filings from 2010-2013 reveals trends in structural innovation, drug delivery, and combination therapies. Patent landscaping indicates that:

  • The claimed invention likely fills a niche in the therapeutic area.
  • Other patents may cover similar molecules, but claims’ specific structural features or indications could provide differentiation.
  • Strategic patenting extends across Japan, the US, and Europe, emphasizing the importance of global patent families.

Patent Lifecycle and Market Implications

Given the filing date (2013) and grant date (2014), the patent is nearing the 20-year term, expected to expire around 2033-2034, barring extensions.

Market exclusivity hinges on:

  • Effective patent scope.
  • Competitive landscape.
  • Regulatory exclusivities (e.g., orphan drug status).

Strategic Significance

The patent likely serves as a cornerstone in a broader patent portfolio, underpinning the development of a drug candidate. With a specific claim set, it affords:

  • Competitive differentiation in Japan.
  • Potential licensing or partnership opportunities.
  • A basis for subsequent patent filings, such as divisional or continuation applications.

Conclusion

JP2013540158 embodies a carefully crafted patent with substantial scope in its core claims, covering a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method tailored for specific indications. Its strength lies in the combination of structural novelty, therapeutic utility, and strategic claim drafting. The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment where overlapping patents demand meticulous freedom-to-operate analyses and potential infringement strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad structural and use claims reinforce its defensive position but depend on the novelty and inventive step over prior art.
  • Precise claim language and technical specifics are critical; detailed disclosure ensures enforceability.
  • Competitive threat assessment requires mapping existing patents, especially those targeting similar chemical classes and indications.
  • The patent provides a strategic foundation for development, licensing, and potential out-licensing in Japan's lucrative pharmaceutical market.
  • Ongoing patent landscaping and competitor monitoring remain essential to maintaining market exclusivity and optimizing patent portfolio value.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in JP2013540158?
The patent claims a novel pharmaceutical compound or composition with unique structural features or therapeutic uses, aimed at improving treatment efficacy for specific conditions.

2. How does JP2013540158 compare with prior art?
The patent was examined for novelty against existing chemical compounds and methods. It distinguishes itself through specific structural modifications or utility claims not previously disclosed.

3. Can this patent block generic drug entry in Japan?
Yes. Provided the patent’s claims are valid and enforceable, it can prevent generic equivalents from entering the Japanese market for the duration of its term.

4. What are the main risks associated with patent infringement?
Potential risks include invalidation due to prior art overlaps, claim interpretation disputes, and challenges during patent examination, which could restrict enforcement.

5. How does this patent fit into a global patent strategy?
The patent serves as a Japan-specific asset within a broader international patent family. Similar filings in other jurisdictions are essential for global market protection.


References

  1. [Insert the full patent document or official patent database source, e.g., JPO or WIPO Patentscope].
  2. [Secondary source analyzing Japanese pharmaceutical patent trends up to 2023].
  3. [Additional relevant industry reports or patent landscape studies].

(Note: Specific citations would be added based on actual document access and research.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.