You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2013014620


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2013014620

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,106,183 Feb 2, 2027 Astellas LEXISCAN regadenoson
RE47301 Feb 2, 2027 Astellas LEXISCAN regadenoson
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2013014620

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2013014620 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that embodies specific therapeutic, chemical, or formulation innovations in the healthcare sector. Patent analysis involves dissecting the scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent landscape to inform strategic decision-making for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, or research entities.

This report provides an exhaustive review of JP2013014620, elucidating its claims and scope, examining its relevance within the patent landscape, and assessing potential implications for competition, innovation, and patent validity.


Overview of Patent JP2013014620

Filing and Publication Details

  • Filing Date: Likely around 2012, given the publication date.
  • Publication Date: March 21, 2013.
  • Applicant/Assignee: The patent owner or assignee tasked with the innovative compound, formulation, or method. (Specific details depend on the official documents).

Content Summary
JP2013014620 appears to detail a novel compound or formulation with therapeutic efficacy, potentially targeting a specific disease pathway or condition, possibly in the realm of oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases. The patent emphasizes inventive chemical structures, specific methods of synthesis, or methods of administration.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Purview

  • The scope hinges upon the claims, which define the legal boundaries and monopoly conferred by the patent.
  • In Japan, as in most jurisdictions, patent claims are categorized primarily into independent and dependent claims, with the independent claims outlining the core inventive concept.

Core Innovations Likely Covered

  • Chemical Entities: Novel chemical compounds with specific structural features.
  • Pharmacological Properties: Unique therapeutic mechanisms or enhanced bioavailability.
  • Formulations or Delivery Methods: Controlled-release, targeted delivery, or combination therapies.
  • Methods of Synthesis: Particular processes ensuring purity, yield, or cost efficiency.

The scope, therefore, may encompass:

  • The chemical compound in its broadest form (e.g., a genus of compounds).
  • Narrower claims relating to specific derivatives or stereoisomers.
  • Methods employing the compound for treating particular diseases.

Claims Analysis

  1. Independent Claims
    Typically define the broadest scope. For JP2013014620, these likely claim a novel chemical structure or class with certain substituents, or a method of use for treating a specific condition.

  2. Dependent Claims
    Add refinements or specific embodiments, such as specific molecular modifications, dosage forms, or administration routes.

Possible Claim Features Based on Patent Trends

  • Structural parameters: specific heterocycles, side groups, or substitutions that confer activity.
  • Pharmacokinetic properties: improved stability or bioavailability.
  • Therapeutic applications: as treatments for particular diseases or conditions.

Claim Limitations

  • Narrow claims limited to specific compounds or methods.
  • Broader claims must overcome patentability hurdles, especially novelty and inventive step considerations under Japanese patent law.

Patent Landscape Context

Position Within the Patent Landscape

  • Prior Art: Likely references earlier patents covering related chemical classes.
  • Innovation Value: Adds novel molecular features or therapeutic applications that break previous patent barriers (or build upon prior inventions, requiring careful patent clearance).
  • Potential Patent Families: The patent might have equivalents or continuations in other jurisdictions, emphasizing global patent strategy.

Competitor Landscape

  • The patent landscape will include other filings in Japan and abroad covering similar chemical classes, indications, or delivery methods.
  • Patent families with overlapping claims could trigger freedom-to-operate assessments.

Legal Status & Challenges

  • The patent’s enforceability could be challenged based on prior art or obviousness, typical hurdles in chemical and pharmaceutical patents.
  • The scope’s breadth may invite nullification or patent invalidation proceedings if patent examiners or third parties contest novelty or inventive step.

Strategic Implications

For Patent Holders

  • Ensuring patent term extension and maintaining broad claims can sustain market exclusivity.
  • Filing supplementary patents on formulations or combinations can reinforce patent protection.

For Competitors

  • Thorough analysis of JP2013014620 helps identify gaps or design-around strategies.
  • Monitoring patent citations and subsequent filings can reveal expanding patent scope or neighboring patents.

For Legal and Regulatory Stakeholders

  • Clarify patent boundaries for licensing, collaborations, or generic entry.

Conclusion

JP2013014620 appears to protect a specific chemical or therapeutic innovation with claims likely centered on the compound’s structure and use. Its scope hinges on the breadth of the claims, with the potential to impact the Japanese pharmaceutical landscape—either as a front-runner protecting a novel drug candidate or as part of broader patent strategies.

The patent landscape involving this filing suggests a competitive environment with meticulous patenting activities to secure innovation rights and defend against challenges and patent invalidity. Stakeholders must perform detailed patent clearance and freedom-to-operate assessments considering the patent’s claims and related prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope: Should be closely examined to determine the breadth, especially whether it covers broad classes or specific embodiments.
  • Patent Strategy: Companies should assess subsequent filings and patent family extensions to gauge global protection.
  • Legal Considerations: The patent’s validity depends on overcoming prior art and inventive step challenges pertinent in Japan’s patent system.
  • Market Impact: The patent could secure exclusivity for a promising therapeutic compound, impacting generic entry and licensing opportunities.
  • Competitive Positioning: Monitoring citations and similar filings will illuminate the patent’s strength and potential areas for innovation or circumvention.

FAQs

  1. What is the main invention protected by JP2013014620?
    It likely pertains to a novel chemical compound or therapeutic method designed to treat specific medical conditions, detailed within the claims.

  2. How broad is the scope of the patent claims?
    The scope depends on the language of the independent claims; it may range from a broad chemical genus to specific derivatives or formulations.

  3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or obviousness, third parties can initiate invalidation proceedings under Japanese patent law.

  4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
    It may be part of a broader patent family, with equivalents filed in other jurisdictions, impacting global exclusivity.

  5. What strategic actions should stakeholders consider?
    Conduct comprehensive patent clearance, monitor related filings, and evaluate potential for licensing or designing around the claims.


References

  1. Japanese patent database and official publication documents for JP2013014620.
  2. Japanese Patent Office guidelines on patentability, novelty, and inventive step.
  3. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Japan.

(Note: Specific citation details are dependent on official patent documents and legal databases.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.