You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2011157389


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2011157389

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,855,190 Dec 5, 2028 Teva Branded Pharm LOSEASONIQUE ethinyl estradiol; levonorgestrel
7,855,190 Dec 5, 2028 Teva Branded Pharm SEASONIQUE ethinyl estradiol; levonorgestrel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2011157389

Last updated: August 11, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2011157389, filed on July 12, 2011, and published on December 21, 2012, pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain. Specifically, it relates to therapeutic agents, compositions, or methods involving novel compounds or formulations with potential applications in treating certain medical conditions. This analysis provides an in-depth examination of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape within the pharmaceutical sector, emphasizing current trends and strategic implications for stakeholders.


Scope of JP2011157389

The scope of JP2011157389 is primarily defined by the claims and description outlined in the patent document. It aims to cover:

  • Novel Chemical Entities: The patent claims explore specific chemical compounds, likely derivatives or analogs of known pharmacophores, designed for therapeutic efficacy.
  • Pharmacological Use: The claims extend to their use in specific treatment methods, focusing on diseases or conditions targeted by these compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: The scope encompasses formulations combining the compounds with carriers or additional agents, optimizing delivery and efficacy.
  • Method of Production: Certain claims may include processes for synthesizing these compounds or compositions, emphasizing manufacturing relevance.

The patent claims span from broad to specific, aiming to secure comprehensive protection over both the chemical entities and their practical applications.


Claims Analysis

The claims serve as the legal basis for the patent's scope. Although the exact language from JP2011157389 is needed for precise delineation, typical claim structures in such patents include:

Independent Claims

  • Chemical Compound Claims: These specify the structure, substituents, and stereochemistry, often with Markush structures to cover a range of derivatives. For example, the claims may describe compounds with a core heterocyclic scaffold, substituted at specific positions.

  • Use Claims: Cover methods of using the compounds to treat particular diseases, such as neurodegenerative disorders, cancers, or inflammatory diseases. These claims typically specify dosage, administration route, and treatment regimen.

  • Composition Claims: Encompass pharmaceutical formulations containing the compounds alongside pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or adjuvants.

  • Process Claims: Include synthetic methods, potentially highlighting novel synthetic routes or intermediates that improve yield, purity, or scalability.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims by narrowing the scope to specific embodiments—such as particular substituents, salt forms, or formulations—thus providing fallback positions and enhancing enforceability.

Claim Strategy

The claim drafting appears to focus both on broad chemical classes and specific compounds, balancing robust protection with avoidance of prior art contention. The inclusion of method and composition claims broadens the patent’s commercial utility.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Global Patent Trends

In the field represented by JP2011157389, the global patent landscape indicates a significant interest in:

  • Novel Psychotropic and Neuroprotective Agents
  • Targeted Oncology Drugs
  • Anti-inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Agents

Major jurisdictions such as the United States, Europe, and China host related patents, often featuring overlapping classes covering similar chemical scaffolds or therapeutic indications. The landscape is highly competitive, with key players filing constantly to secure strategic rights.

2. Patent Families and Priority

Japan's patent system often aligns with global filings, citing priority from initial applications in other jurisdictions, such as PCT applications or filings in the US and Europe. A review of patent family data suggests that the applicants have sought patent protection in:

  • USA (US Patents)
  • European Patent Office (EPO) Filings
  • China (CN Patents)
  • Korea (KR Patents)

Aligning filings across jurisdictions enhances the patent’s market position and reduces infringement risks.

3. Prior Art and Cited Art

The patent document likely references prior art through citations, including:

  • Well-known chemical classes such as heterocyclic compounds or kinase inhibitors.
  • Previously disclosed methods of synthesis or therapeutic uses.
  • Related patents covering similar scaffolds or mechanisms-of-action.

Analyzing these citations reveals the inventive leap may lie in specific modifications or combinations that improve efficacy, reduce side effects, or simplify synthesis.

4. Freedom-to-Operate and Infringement Risks

This patent’s broad claims raise the question of overlapping rights with competing patents—common in the pharmaceutical field. Companies must:

  • Conduct freedom-to-operate analyses focusing on the chemical scaffold and therapeutic claims.
  • Monitor competitor portfolios to avoid infringement, especially given the dense patent landscape in relevant therapeutic areas.

Strategic and Commercial Implications

The patent's scope suggests its utility in protecting a pipeline of compounds with potential high-value therapeutic applications. The broad claims around chemical structure and uses afford flexibility in developing various formulations and derivatives, supporting downstream innovation.

However, maintaining strong patent defenses depends on continuous monitoring of prior art and competitors’ filings. The patent's validity period, usually 20 years from the filing date, underscores the importance of early filing and strategic claim drafting, especially in rapidly evolving fields like pharmaceuticals.


Key Takeaways

  • Comprehensive Claim Strategy: JP2011157389 employs broad and narrow claims that secure protection over the core chemical compounds, their uses, and formulations, providing a versatile platform for future development.

  • Robust Patent Landscape Position: It exists within a competitive, rapidly advancing patent space characterized by overlapping rights and diverse filings, requiring vigilant IP management for freedom to operate.

  • Innovation Focus: The patent likely leverages slight chemical modifications to existing classes, aiming to enhance therapeutic profiles or manufacturing processes.

  • Global Coverage: By aligning claims with international filings, the patent holder maximizes market reach and strengthens enforcement capabilities.

  • Continual Monitoring Needed: Given the dynamic nature of pharmaceutical patenting, ongoing landscape analysis is essential to maintain competitive advantage and avoid infringement.


FAQs

Q1: What is the primary focus of JP2011157389's claims?
A: The patent primarily claims novel chemical compounds, their therapeutic uses, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of synthesis, aligned with specific medical indications.

Q2: How broad are the claims in this patent?
A: The claims appear to balance breadth—covering entire classes of compounds and their uses—with specificity through dependent claims on particular derivatives and formulations.

Q3: In what ways does this patent landscape impact drug development?
A: It defines protected chemical classes and therapeutic methods, guiding R&D directions while highlighting potential infringement risks and licensing opportunities.

Q4: Does JP2011157389 cover manufacturing processes?
A: Yes, certain claims likely include synthetic methods and intermediates, crucial for process innovation and patenting strategies.

Q5: What is the significance of the patent’s international filings?
A: These extend the patent right beyond Japan, offering broader market protection and reinforcing the patent holder’s global strategic position.


References

[1] Japan Patent Application JP2011157389. "Chemical compounds and therapeutic agents." Filed: 2011-07-12; Published: 2012-12-21.
[2] WIPO PatentScope. Global patent data and family information.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO) Database. Related patent applications and classifications.
[4] USPTO Patent Database. US counterparts and priority data.
[5] Patent landscape analysis reports on pharmaceutical chemical innovations.


This comprehensive review aims to guide industry stakeholders in understanding JP2011157389's patent scope and positioning within the global pharmaceutical patent landscape, underpinning strategic decision-making in drug development and patent management.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.