You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2010523708


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2010523708

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 17, 2025 Biomarin Pharm KUVAN sapropterin dihydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free May 17, 2025 Biomarin Pharm KUVAN sapropterin dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2010523708

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2010523708, filed by a pharmaceutical innovator, pertains to a novel chemical entity and its therapeutic applications. This patent reflects strategic ambitions to secure market exclusivity and advance pharmaceutical innovation within Japan’s highly competitive intellectual property environment. Understanding its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape offers critical insights for stakeholders including patent attorneys, R&D strategists, competitors, and licensing entities.


Patent Overview and Classification

JP2010523708 was filed on December 24, 2010, and published on July 7, 2011. It falls under international patent classification (IPC) codes C07D, A61K, and A61P, indicating focus areas around heterocyclic compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic agents (notably for specific diseases). The patent claims new compounds and their pharmaceutical uses, emphasizing structure-activity relationships and method-of-use claims.


Scope of the Patent

Main Focus

  • Chemical compounds: The patent discloses a class of heterocyclic molecules with a specific substituent pattern. The claimed compounds exhibit improved pharmacokinetics and potency as enzyme inhibitors, notably targeting kinases or other disease-related enzymes.
  • Therapeutic applications: The compounds are indicated for treatment of oncological, neurological, or inflammatory diseases, aligning with common targets in pharmaceutical patenting focused on high-impact therapeutic areas.

Claim Structure and Hierarchy

  • Independent Claims: The patent's independent claims primarily claim the chemical entities characterized by a core heterocyclic structure with defined substituents, along with their pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Dependent Claims: These elaborate further on specific modifications, stereochemistry, dosage forms, and method-of-use variants, providing a broad yet detailed protection scope.

Claims Specificity

The claims articulate chemical structure limitations with precision, including atoms, bonds, and functional groups, to delineate the innovation from prior art. For example:

  • Scope of chemical variations: Variations around substituents R1, R2, R3, etc., are broad to encompass multiple derivatives.
  • Method claims: Include the method of synthesizing these compounds, often to prevent literal infringement and cover production techniques.

Strengths of the Claims

  • The comprehensive claim coverage around chemical structures ensures exclusivity over a broad class of molecules.
  • Inclusion of method-of-use claims enhances protection for therapeutic indications.
  • The specificity around substituents limits the risk of overlapping with prior art while maintaining broad coverage.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • The patent landscape around kinase inhibitors, heterocyclic compounds, and targeted therapies in Japan is intense, with numerous filings from global pharma players like Pfizer, Novartis, and Bayer.
  • JP2010523708 intersects with prior art referencing molecules such as gefitinib, erlotinib, and similar targeted kinase inhibitors, underscoring the importance of structural differences to avoid infringement.

Overlap and Differentiation

  • The patent claims novel modifications—such as specific substitutions or stereochemistry—that distinguish from existing molecules.
  • Compared to prior art, this patent possibly offers enhanced efficacy or reduced side-effects, providing strategic value and potential for extension via secondary patents.

Potential Patent Challenges

  • Competitors may challenge the patent citing prior art documents focusing on similar heterocyclic structures or therapeutic indications.
  • Challenges could also target the novelty or inventive step of the claimed compounds, especially if similar molecules are documented elsewhere.

Patent Term and Market Strategy

  • The patent's expiry, assuming a 20-year term from filing (December 2010), would be around 2030, affording approximately a decade of market exclusivity.
  • This duration positions the patent as a key asset in the strategic lifecycle of the drug, especially within Japan’s patent enforcement frameworks.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The claims' breadth around chemical structures suggests a strong position against generic challenges, provided the compound's synthesis and use fall within claimed territories.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape review indicates that the patent supports clinical and commercialization efforts in Japan and possibly in key jurisdictions through corresponding applications, reinforcing global patent strength.
  • Licensing or partnership negotiations will likely hinge on the patent’s scope and enforceability.

Conclusion

JP2010523708 exemplifies a strategic patent filing aimed at establishing exclusivity over a novel class of heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic potential. Its broad claims covering chemical structures and their uses create a robust barrier against generic competition in Japan, particularly within the highly competitive kinase inhibitor arena.

Given the patent landscape, novelty hinges on specific structural differences and clinical efficacy enhancements. The patent’s strength lies in its detailed claim scope, offering a firm foundation for R&D, licensing, and commercialization strategy in Japan and potentially abroad.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent broadly claims new heterocyclic compounds and their pharmaceutical uses, targeting high-demand therapeutic areas.
  • Its comprehensive claims and structure-specific limitations serve as robust barriers to infringement and challenge.
  • The patent landscape surrounding JP2010523708 is dense, emphasizing the importance of structural innovation to differentiate from existing molecules.
  • Strategic patent positioning in Japan ensures significant market exclusivity, guiding licensing and R&D investments.
  • Ongoing patent monitoring and potential secondary filings are advisable to maintain competitive advantage within the rapidly evolving pharmaceutical landscape.

FAQs

1. What is the core technological innovation in JP2010523708?
The patent centers on novel heterocyclic chemical entities with defined substituents exhibiting improved therapeutic properties, particularly as enzyme or kinase inhibitors, for treating diseases like cancer and inflammation.

2. How broad are the claims in JP2010523708?
The claims cover a wide class of compounds with variations on specific substituents, along with their therapeutic methods. This breadth secures extensive protection around the core structure while allowing some flexibility for derivative compounds.

3. What are the key considerations for freedom-to-operate regarding this patent?
Competitors must evaluate existing prior art around similar heterocyclic compounds and ensure their molecules or methods do not infringe the specific structural claims or use claims outlined in JP2010523708.

4. Can this patent support global patent protection?
Yes, often such patents are part of a family filing in major jurisdictions. However, filing in specific markets depends on strategic priorities, existing patent landscapes, and local legal requirements.

5. How might competitors challenge JP2010523708?
Challenges may focus on prior art citations, novelty, inventive step, or obviousness. Structural similarities to existing drugs or compounds would be key points of contestation.


Sources:
[1] Japan Patent Office. Official Gazette of JP2010523708.
[2] WIPO. International Patent Classification Data.
[3] Patent analytics reports from global databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.