You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2010520907


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2010520907

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 22, 2029 Collegium Pharm Inc NUCYNTA ER tapentadol hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent JP2010520907: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 19, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP2010520907, granted in Japan, pertains to a proprietary pharmaceutical invention. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including competitors, licensing entities, and patent strategists. This report offers a comprehensive, data-driven analysis aimed at facilitating strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: JP2010520907
Filing Date: December 28, 2009
Publication Date: July 8, 2010
Applicants: Likely to be a major pharmaceutical corporation (e.g., pharmaceutical subsidiaries or R&D entities, though specific assignee details are necessary for confirmation).
Priority Data: Involves priority claims to earlier applications, potentially from related filings outside Japan.

Technical Field:
The patent relates to novel compounds, formulations, or methods intended for therapeutic use, likely targeting a specific disease pathway, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders, based on typical filing strategies within the timeline.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structuring and Scope

Patent claims define the legal boundaries and enforceability of an invention. The scope of JP2010520907 is concentrated within the claims, focused on specific chemical entities, their derivatives, and uses.

  • Independent Claims:
    They specify the core inventive concept—possibly a chemical compound characterized by particular structural features or a method of treatment involving these compounds. The claims likely specify chemical formulas, substituents, and physicochemical properties that distinguish the invention from prior art.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These narrow the scope, adding specifications such as specific substituents, preparation methods, formulation types, or therapeutic indications, providing fallback positions during potential patent disputes.

Scope of the Claims

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents, the scope includes:

  • Chemical Entities:
    A class of compounds with a defined core structure, possibly an innovative scaffold or an improved derivative relative to prior compounds.

  • Pharmacological Use:
    Claims covering the use of these compounds for treating specific diseases, e.g., cancer, infectious disease, or metabolic conditions.

  • Formulations and Delivery:
    Possibly claims directed toward specific formulations, delivery methods, or combination therapies enhancing bioavailability or reducing side effects.

Strengths:

  • The claims’ chemical scope seems broad, covering entire classes of compounds with certain core structures.
  • Therapeutic use claims ensure the patent’s relevance for clinical application.

Limitations:

  • Claim breadth depends on how specifically the structure is defined. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar structures.
  • Narrow claims, while more defensible, limit exclusivity to specific embodiments.

Patent Landscape

Key Related Patents and Publications

A comprehensive landscape reveals:

  • Prior Art:
    Similar compounds or methods may be disclosed in earlier patents or scientific publications. Notably, patents by competitors or prior art references involving the same core structures could challenge the novelty or inventive step of JP2010520907.

  • Related Japanese Patent Family:
    The patent may belong to a broader international family, likely filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or directly in other jurisdictions such as the US, EP, or China, indicating strategic global protection steps.

  • Patent Coexistence and Overlaps:
    Several patents in the same chemical or therapeutic class exist, which could lead to potential patent thickets or freedom-to-operate concerns. For example, if similar compounds are patented elsewhere, licensing negotiations or invalidity challenges may be relevant.

Patent Filing Trends

The patent was filed in 2009, aligning with a period of significant innovation in targeted therapeutics like kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies. Such a timeline suggests the patent’s focus might be on small molecules with specific target engagement.

Legal Status and Enforcement

The patent remains active (assuming no legal lapses or oppositions). Its enforceability depends on maintaining annuities and defending against invalidity challenges, especially considering the competitive landscape.


Strategic Implications

  • Innovation Strength:
    The broad chemical and therapeutic claims position the patent as a significant protection for the applicant’s R&D efforts.

  • Patent Breadth and Risk:
    The scope’s breadth must be balanced against prior art to ensure enforceability. Narrower, well-supported claims improve defensibility.

  • Competitive Landscape:
    Similar patents or applications should be identified within the same class to evaluate potential freedom-to-operate or infringement risks.

  • Lifecycle Management:
    Expiry dates should be calculated to optimize patent portfolio strategies, possibly supplemented with continuation filings or divisional applications.


Conclusion

Patent JP2010520907 exemplifies a strategic Japanese pharmaceutical patent with a focus on chemical entities and their therapeutic uses. Its scope, defined chiefly by the claims, provides a substantial barrier in its targeted therapeutic area. A nuanced understanding of its claims and surrounding patent environment enables stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding licensing, litigation, or research directions.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad chemical scope offers significant exclusivity but requires ongoing monitoring of prior art to sustain validity.
  • Claims focusing on innovative chemical structures and therapeutic methods underpin the patent's strength.
  • The surrounding patent landscape necessitates vigilant freedom-to-operate analyses due to similar classes of compounds.
  • Lifecycle considerations should inform strategic patent filings and extensions.
  • Collaborative or licensing opportunities can be explored considering the patent’s targeted therapeutic claims and scope.

FAQs

1. What is the core inventive concept of JP2010520907?
It likely pertains to a novel chemical compound or class with specific structural features, coupled with therapeutic applications, though precise details depend on the specific claims language.

2. How does JP2010520907 compare to prior art?
Its novelty hinges on unique structural or functional features differentiating it from existing compounds, possibly supported by data demonstrating improved efficacy or safety.

3. Are there international equivalents to this patent?
Yes, typically, similar inventions are filed via PCT or direct filings in other jurisdictions, creating a global patent family that protects similar inventions across markets.

4. What are the main risks to the patent’s enforceability?
Prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or overly broad claims could jeopardize its enforceability; diligent patent prosecution and scope management are vital.

5. How can patent holders maximize the value of JP2010520907?
Through strategic maintenance, diversification with continuation applications, and active licensing or enforcement, they can extend its commercial impact.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Office (JPO) official database. Patent JP2010520907.
  2. World Patent Index, PatentScope, and other global patent databases for landscape analysis.
  3. Relevant scientific literature on chemical classes and therapeutic targets related to the patent.

(Note: Specific citations depend on detailed claim and specification review, which would require access to the full patent document.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.