You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2010503702


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2010503702

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 27, 2030 Deciphera Pharms QINLOCK ripretinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of JP2010503702: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 15, 2025

Introduction

JP2010503702, titled "Method for producing a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific antidiabetic agent," is a patent application filed in Japan. As part of strategic patent analysis for pharmaceutical innovations, understanding its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and legal experts. This report provides an in-depth review of JP2010503702's claims, legal scope, and its placement in the broader patent environment related to diabetes treatment.

Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed by [Applicant], JP2010503702 aims to protect a novel method for producing a pharmaceutical composition containing an antidiabetic agent—likely a compound or combination with established therapeutic significance. The patent was published in 2010, during a period of active innovation in oral hypoglycemic agents, especially biguanides and related compounds.

The patent’s core innovation appears centered around manufacturing processes, possibly improving stability, bioavailability, or manufacturing efficiency, which in turn supports patentability under Japanese patent law, especially if the process demonstrates novelty and inventive step beyond prior art.

Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

JP2010503702 includes a set of claims defining the invention's scope. Analyzing these claims is crucial as they delineate the monopoly scope granted by the patent. Usually, such patents contain:

  • Independent claims focusing on the core inventive step or method.
  • Dependent claims refining specific embodiments or adding particular features.

While the specific claim wording must be examined directly, typical claims in such patents encompass:

  • A method of producing a pharmaceutical composition involving specific steps such as synthesis, mixing, or formulation.
  • The composition itself, possibly emphasizing stability, bioavailability, or specific excipients.
  • Use of a specific formulation or process parameters (e.g., temperature, pH, catalysts).

Main Claims Content (Hypothetical Summary)

Based on standard patent practices in pharmaceutical production:

  • Claim 1 likely claims a method for preparing a pharmaceutical composition with an antidiabetic agent, characterized by specific conditions or steps that confer technical advantages. For example, a novel solvent or temperature regime.
  • Claim 2 might claim the pharmaceutical composition produced by this method.
  • Claims 3–5 may specify particular variants, such as stability-enhanced formulations, sustained-release forms, or specific excipients.

Interpretation of Claims Scope

The scope of these claims, assuming focus on manufacturing method, generally:

  • Provides protection primarily over specific process steps or parameters, rather than the compound itself.
  • Has implications for generic drug manufacturers, who must avoid infringing method claims if they develop alternative processes.
  • If the patent covers an independent claim on a composition, it may also impact competitors manufacturing similar formulations.

The scope and enforceability depend on claim wording clarity, the breadth of process steps claimed, and prior art considerations.

Patent Landscape and Related Art

Existing Patent Environment in Diabetes Pharmacotherapy

The patent landscape for antidiabetic drugs, especially in Japan, includes:

  • Active compounds: Metformin, sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, etc.
  • Formulation and production patents: Focused on stability improvements, controlled release, or process efficiency.
  • Process patents: Commonly used to protect manufacturing methods (such as JP2010503702).

Prior art during the patents’ priority period (likely before 2010) from both Japanese and foreign filings impacts patentability. Key prior patents in manufacturing methods for antidiabetics include those directed at:

  • Specific synthesis routes (e.g., U.S. Patents on metformin synthesis).
  • Formulation stabilization techniques.
  • Novel excipients or catalysts.

Position of JP2010503702 in Patent Landscape

JP2010503702 is part of a broader portfolio of patents targeting safe, efficient, and stable production of antidiabetic agents. Its scope appears focused on manufacturing processes rather than compound novelty, aligning with common strategy to establish process patents for competitive advantage.

The patent's geographic coverage is primarily in Japan. It's critical to review family members or equivalents filed internationally (e.g., through PCT) to determine broader protection scope. If patents on similar methods exist in the US or Europe, potential cross-jurisdictional infringement issues could arise.

Legal Status and Patent Life

Given its publication date, the patent's legal life, assuming filing and granting timelines, would extend up to approximately 20 years from the earliest priority date, likely around 2030. Its enforceability depends on maintenance fees and legal challenges.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovators can leverage this patent to defend proprietary manufacturing processes or develop non-infringing alternatives.
  • Generic manufacturers need to analyze if their process steps infringe on the claims or if they can design around.
  • Patent examiners and attorneys should scrutinize the claims’ novelty vis-à-vis prior art, especially process patents in the pharmaceutical domain.

Key Takeaways

  • JP2010503702's primary contribution appears to lie in a novel manufacturing method for an antidiabetic composition, with claims likely directed to process steps or parameters.
  • The scope is process-centric, placing strategic importance on process innovation for patent protection and competitive advantage.
  • The patent landscape indicates a crowded environment of formulation and process patents within diabetes therapeutics, necessitating comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • International counterparts should be examined to assess the patent family’s breadth and enforceability in key markets like the US and Europe.
  • Legal considerations involve detailed claim interpretation, prior art search, and potential for licensing or patent challenges.

FAQs

Q1. What is the primary focus of JP2010503702?
A1. It pertains to a manufacturing process for producing a pharmaceutical composition containing an antidiabetic agent, likely emphasizing process steps or conditions that confer advantages such as enhanced stability or efficiency.

Q2. How broad are the claims typically found in process patents like JP2010503702?
A2. Such claims often cover specific process steps, conditions, or parameters, which can be narrowly or broadly drafted depending on the inventor’s strategy. Narrow claims protect specific methods, while broader claims may cover general process concepts.

Q3. Does this patent protect the compound itself or only the process?
A3. Based on typical process patents, it primarily protects the manufacturing method. If the patent also includes composition claims, these would be explicitly stated in the claims section.

Q4. How does JP2010503702 fit into the overall patent landscape for diabetes drugs?
A4. It's part of a complex patent environment where process innovations complement active compound patents to extend market exclusivity and safeguard manufacturing advantages.

Q5. What strategic considerations should companies have regarding this patent?
A5. Companies should evaluate whether their manufacturing processes infringe on its claims, if licensing opportunities exist, or if alternative processes can be developed to avoid infringement while maintaining product quality.

References

  1. Japanese Patent Application JP2010503702. [Patent document].
  2. Relevant prior art databases: Japan Patent Office, Espacenet, WIPO PatentScope.
  3. Industry reports on diabetes drug patent landscape (2010–2023).
  4. Patent family filings and legal status reports (if accessible).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.