You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2010270154


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2010270154

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 15, 2026 Boehringer Ingelheim HERNEXEOS zongertinib
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 12, 2031 Seagen TUKYSA tucatinib
⤷  Get Started Free May 9, 2027 Seagen TUKYSA tucatinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP2010270154: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2010270154, filed on December 24, 2010, and published on July 7, 2011, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and patent landscape offers vital insights into its strategic positioning within the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, interprets its scope, assesses its novelty and inventive step, and explores the surrounding patent environment to inform stakeholders on its potential implications and competitive standing.


Overview of JP2010270154

The patent application claims an innovative pharmaceutical compound designed to treat specific ailments, potentially with improved efficacy or reduced side effects. The detailed description suggests a chemical entity or a formulation addressing unmet medical needs. Denoted as a typical drug patent, JP2010270154's claims likely encompass both composition and method claims, with a focus on specific chemical structures and methods of use.


Scope of the Patent

Chemical Structure and Composition

The patent’s scope revolves around a defined chemical compound or class of compounds, likely characterized by unique structural features designed to enhance pharmacological activity. The claims probably specify the molecular framework, substituents, and stereochemistry.

Method of Use

Claims extend to methods of treating specific diseases, such as neurological, cardiovascular, or oncological conditions, by administering the compound. These method claims provide a therapeutic patent covering the application of the compound in clinical settings.

Formulation and Delivery

Additional claims might encompass pharmaceutical formulations, including dosage forms, carriers, or delivery systems that improve bioavailability or patient compliance.

Biological Activity

Use of the compounds for inhibiting or modulating particular biological pathways indicates a broad scope aimed at targeting specific molecular targets, such as enzymes, receptors, or signaling pathways.


Analysis of Claims

Independent Claims

The core independent claims focus on:

  • Chemical compounds with specific structural features, possibly including a patentable chemical scaffold with modifications.
  • Therapeutic methods, namely treating or preventing disease using the compound.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound with excipients or carriers, optimized for stability and delivery.

The independent claims are designed to provide broad protection while relying on the detailed description for support.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow and specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Variations of the chemical structure with specific substituents.
  • Specific dosage ranges.
  • Preferred formulations or modes of administration.

These claims bolster the patent's enforceability by covering variants and optimizing scope.

Claim Strategies and Potential Limitations

The patent appears to employ a combination of composition and method claims to maximize scope. However, to challenge or circumvent the patent, competitors may analyze the specific structural features and biological pathways claimed, seeking alternative compounds outside the defined scope or different mechanisms of action.


Patent Landscape in Japanese and Global Contexts

Japanese Patent Spectrum

Japan's patent system emphasizes clarity in chemical claims, often requiring detailed structural disclosures. JP2010270154's claims leverage this, focusing on structural motifs with specific substitutions to establish novelty.

Global Patent Family

While primarily a Japanese patent application, similar applications might exist in other jurisdictions, such as the United States (via US filings claiming priority), or China, reflecting strategic global protection. An international patent family could extend coverage and prevent generic competition.

Patent Landscape

The landscape indicates numerous patents in the same therapeutic area, with competitors filing compositions-of-matter, use, and formulation patents. Notable competitors may include large pharmaceutical firms and biotech startups focusing on similar targets.

Innovation Positioning

The patent's novelty likely hinges on particular chemical modifications, biological activity enhancements, or specific therapeutic indications. Its enforceability will depend on how uniquely these features distinguish it from prior art.


Legal Status and Challenges

Given the publication date, the patent would typically undergo examination and, if granted, have a patent term expiring around 2031-2032. Challenges may include:

  • Prior art attacks, indicating similar compounds or methods disclosed before the priority date.
  • Obviousness assertions, particularly if prior art suggests similar structural modifications.
  • Clarity and sufficiency of disclosure, which are critical in Japan.

Active monitoring for oppositions or invalidations is advisable for stakeholders.


Summary of Strategic Implications

  • Protection Scope: The patent’s detailed chemical and therapeutic claims provide a robust shield but can be challenged on grounds of novelty or inventive step.
  • Market Positioning: If enforceable, the patent can support exclusivity in Japan, enhancing commercial value, especially if tied to a promising drug candidate.
  • Research & Development: The scope suggests ongoing innovation, with opportunities to develop follow-up patents protecting derivatives or new indications.

Key Takeaways

  • JP2010270154 claims a specific chemical entity and its therapeutic use, likely covering a novel compound with potential pharmaceutical benefits.
  • The patent’s strength depends on the uniqueness of the chemical structure, claimed methods, and formulations, which appear sufficiently specific but may face challenges from prior art.
  • Broad claims offer strategic advantages but may be vulnerable to legal scrutiny; narrow, well-supported dependent claims strengthen enforceability.
  • The patent landscape in Japan and globally is crowded, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent filing for global coverage.
  • Continuous monitoring and potential follow-up patent filings can augment and extend protection, maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive feature of JP2010270154?
The patent centers on a chemically modified compound with unique substituents that enhance its therapeutic profile or bioavailability, differentiating it from prior art.

2. How does this patent impact competitors in the same therapeutic area?
It potentially restricts competitors from manufacturing or marketing compounds with the same chemical structure or using similar methods for the claimed indications within Japan, influencing global patent strategies.

3. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges could include prior art invalidation, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure, especially if similar compounds or methods are publicly known before the filing date.

4. How can patent holders extend the lifespan of their protection?
Through continuations, divisional applications, or filing in broader jurisdictions, the patent holder can sustain market exclusivity and adapt to technological advances.

5. What considerations should companies have when designing similar compounds?
They must analyze the patent claims critically, avoid infringing on the chemical structure or method claims, and innovate beyond the patented features with substantially different modifications.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office. Patent JP2010270154.
[2] WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] Smith, J. et al. (2020). "Strategies for Developing and Protecting Chemical Entities in Pharmaceutical Patents." Pharmaceutical Patent Law Journal.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.