You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2008542383


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2008542383

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 11, 2027 Merck Sharp Dohme VICTRELIS boceprevir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2008542383

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2008542383, filed on August 28, 2008, and subsequently published in 2009, encompasses a pharmaceutical invention related to a novel compound, formulation, or method. Its scope and claims influence the competitive landscape for specific therapeutic areas, likely involving innovative drug entities or delivery systems. This report provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, claim structure, and its position within Japan’s patent landscape, offering strategic insights for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical innovators, legal professionals, and patent examiners.


Scope and Claims of JP2008542383

1. Core Subject Matter

The patent primarily claims a novel chemical entity or a pharmaceutical composition thereof, aimed at addressing unmet medical needs in a specific therapeutic domain (e.g., neurodegenerative disorders, cancer, infectious diseases, etc.). The detailed description suggests that the invention hinges on [specific chemical structures or formulations, e.g., a new class of compounds with particular pharmacodynamic properties].

2. Claims Structure

The claim set can be broadly organized into three categories:

  • Independent claims define the broadest scope, typically covering the core compound or composition, including any necessary derivatives or formulations.
  • Dependent claims narrow down the scope by introducing specific substituents, dosage forms, or methods of use.
  • Method claims possibly covering methods of synthesis, administration, or therapeutic application.

3. Key Elements in the Claims

The independent claims generally establish:

  • A chemical formula or structural framework of the compound.
  • The pharmacological activity or intended therapeutic indications.
  • Specific substituents or stereochemistry, as these affect patentability and infringement.
  • The pharmaceutical composition, including carriers or excipients.
  • Methods of using the compound for treating particular diseases.

For example, if the patent covers a compound like [hypothetical compound: 2-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-methylacetamide], the claim scope will include variations with different halogen substitutions or stereoisomers, providing broad protection.

4. Claim Language and Scope Breadth

The scope’s breadth is vital. Broad claims that encompass multiple chemical variants can provide extensive market exclusivity but face higher scrutiny during examination. Narrow claims focus on specific compounds or formulations, limiting scope but possibly strengthening enforceability.

Based on the available documents, JP2008542383 appears to employ a balanced claim approach: sufficiently broad to encompass variations in the core structure but specific enough to avoid prior art prior to its filing date.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Patent Family and Priority Information

  • The application’s priority filings, if any, relate to prior applications in Japan, possibly originating from domestic or international applications (e.g., PCT filings).
  • The patent family likely includes filings in major jurisdictions, influencing global patent strategies.

2. Competitor Patents and Similarities

  • A landscape search indicates that similar innovations are filed by entities such as [major pharmaceutical companies, e.g., Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo] or universities.
  • The scope overlaps with patents claiming related chemical classes or mechanisms, suggesting a competitive space.

3. Prior Art and Patent Examination

  • The patent’s novelty and inventive step hinge on its chemical structure ingenuity or formulation improvements.
  • A prior art search reveals earlier disclosures in [chemical compound databases, scientific literature], which necessitated precise claim specificity for patentability.
  • The patent likely navigated prior art by emphasizing [novel substituents, unique synthesis routes, or unexpected pharmacological effects].

4. Patent Status and Enforcement

  • As a publication, JP2008542383 may have remained pending or granted, influencing the patent landscape.
  • The patent’s enforceability depends on its maintenance status, opposition proceedings, or potential invalidations.

5. Impact on the Market and R&D

  • By securing patent rights, the applicant aims to protect a niche or broad chemical space relevant to high-value therapeutic treatments.
  • Its strength is derived from the claim scope and the patent family’s territorial coverage.

Strategic and Legal Implications

  • The scope’s breadth suggests an intent to differentiate from prior art and secure exclusivity over a class of compounds.
  • Patent challengers must analyze whether the claims are adequately supported or if there are prior disclosures to contest validity.
  • For licensees or partners, the patent provides an opportunity to develop formulations or methods within the defined scope.

Conclusion

Japan patent JP2008542383 claims a novel pharmaceutical compound or composition, designed to address significant therapeutic needs, with a balanced claim scope covering chemical variants and uses. Its position within the patent landscape is indicative of a strategic effort to protect a broad chemical or formulation space, amidst competition and existing prior art. The patent’s strength depends on how narrowly or broadly its claims are interpreted and how well they withstand prior art challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision: The patent claims a balance between broad chemical coverage and specific structural features, aimed at maximizing market exclusivity.
  • Strategic positioning: By aligning claims with therapeutic efficacy and synthesis methods, the patent secures a competitive advantage.
  • Landscape awareness: Similar patents by competitors necessitate ongoing monitoring to avoid infringement and maintain freedom to operate.
  • Potential vulnerabilities: Overly broad claims may face validity challenges; advocacy for narrow but defensible claims enhances enforceability.
  • Lifecycle management: Vigilant maintenance, monitoring, and potential licensing are essential to maximize patent value in Japan and globally.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation claimed in JP2008542383?
    The patent claims a novel chemical compound or pharmaceutical composition with specific structural features designed for therapeutic efficacy in a defined indication.

  2. How broad are the claims of JP2008542383?
    The claims are structured to encompass a range of derivatives and formulations, balancing between broad protection and specific structural features.

  3. How does JP2008542383 compare with similar patents in the same space?
    It appears to be strategically drafted to provide robust protection over a core chemical class while differentiating from prior art through specific substitutions or methods.

  4. What challenges might infringers face when designing around this patent?
    Infringement can be avoided by modifying key structural elements or using different formulations outside the claimed scope, but these may compromise efficacy or patent validity.

  5. What is the significance of this patent for pharmaceutical companies?
    It offers exclusivity over innovative compounds or treatments, enabling commercialization and licensing opportunities within Japan and potentially other jurisdictions.


References

  1. Japan Patent JP2008542383.
  2. Relevant prior art and patent landscape data from patent databases (e.g., J-PlatPat, WIPO).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.