You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2005533068


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2005533068

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,700,645 Dec 26, 2026 Janssen Prods SYMTUZA cobicistat; darunavir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
7,700,645 Jun 26, 2027 Janssen Prods PREZISTA darunavir
7,700,645 Jun 26, 2027 Janssen Prods PREZCOBIX cobicistat; darunavir ethanolate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2005533068

Last updated: August 17, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2005533068, titled "Method of Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition Containing a Peptide," addresses a novel process for manufacturing peptide-based pharmaceuticals. In the competitive landscape of peptide therapeutics, precise patent claims and scope are vital for defining market exclusivity and strategic IP positioning. This comprehensive review analyzes its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape it influences within Japan and globally.


Patent Overview

Application Filing & Publication:
Filed on March 10, 2005, and published on December 8, 2005, JP2005533068 was assigned to Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, a key player in peptide therapeutics and biologics (1). The patent aims to protect an innovative purification process for peptides, emphasizing increased yield, purity, and stability.

General Purpose:
The patent discloses a method for producing a pharmaceutical composition containing a peptide with improved manufacturing efficiency and quality, pertinent to drugs such as insulin, GLP-1 analogs, and other peptide hormones.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

The patent comprises broad independent claims coupled with specific dependent claims, with primary focus on the process features:

  • Independent Claim 1:
    Describes a method of producing a peptide pharmaceutical composition comprising the steps of peptide synthesis, purification involving specific chromatography conditions, and final formulation.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Specifically delineate preferred solvents, chromatographic media, operating conditions, peptide sequences, and stabilization techniques.

Claim Elements and Scope

1. Process-centric Claims:
The core claims emphasize a purification method involving particular chromatographic steps—such as ion-exchange chromatography—optimized for high recovery and purity (2). By framing claims around "a method comprising..." with specific parameters, the patent secures process rights rather than product protection.

2. Biological Molecule Specification:
While the claims are process-focused, they broadly encompass peptide sequences with certain amino acid motifs, indicating applicability to various peptide drugs, including insulin analogs and incretin mimetics (3).

3. Specificity and breadth:
The claims strike a balance—the process parameters are detailed enough to prevent equivalent processes from bypassing the patent but not so narrow as to limit scope to a single peptide or manufacturing step.


Patent Landscape

1. Post-Filing Patent Environment (2005 onward)

In the mid-2000s, peptide therapeutics experienced rapid growth, particularly in diabetes and metabolic disorder treatments, with key patents surrounding formulation, stabilization, and synthesis methods (4). Takeda’s patent fits within this landscape as a process-oriented patent aiming to improve manufacturing efficiency rather than composition.

2. Related Patents & Prior Arts

  • Preceding Patents:
    Prior art includes patents relating to peptide purification, such as WO1999045924 (5), which discloses general purification steps for peptides, and WO2004058444, focusing on stabilization methods (6). JP2005533068's claims are distinct primarily due to specific chromatography conditions.

  • Patent Family & Continuations:
    The patent family includes international applications (e.g., WO2006058446) claiming similar purification techniques, indicating a strategic intent to extend patent coverage internationally.

3. Enhancing Patent Robustness

The patent's claims are structured to withstand challenges relating to obviousness—by emphasizing unique chromatography conditions—and to extend protection via dependent claims, covering an array of process variations.

4. Enforcement & Litigation Landscape

While no lawsuit data for JP2005533068 is publicly available, Takeda actively defends patent rights in peptide formulations. Given the patent’s scope, infringement could occur where third-party manufacturers employ similar chromatography-based purification processes, especially in Japan and emerging markets.

5. Compatibility with Global Patent Strategies

Takeda's parallel filings in the US (US7,950,117) and Europe reflect a coordinated approach to securing worldwide rights for its peptide manufacturing innovatives, reducing risks of patent erosion through local alternatives.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • For Innovators:
    The patent sets a benchmark for process-specific peptide purification, guiding R&D toward optimizing chromatography conditions without infringing Takeda's claims.

  • For Competing Patent Filings:
    New patents must either innovate further by modifying purification parameters or target different process steps to avoid infringement.

  • For Patent Managers & Strategists:
    Considering the patent's broad process scope, careful clearance searches are necessary before developing similar manufacturing methods.


Conclusion & Key Takeaways

JP2005533068 exemplifies a strategic process patent in the peptide pharmaceutical landscape, emphasizing inventive chromatography techniques. Its claims, carefully drafted to balance breadth and specificity, provide Takeda with substantial protection in peptide manufacturing processes, not only within Japan but as part of a broader international patent strategy.

The patent landscape features neighboring patents and prior art that underscore the incremental nature of peptide process innovations, with Takeda’s patent serving as a critical pillar for its peptide drug portfolio. Stakeholders should monitor such patents for their influence on manufacturing rights, infringement risks, and licensing opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Protective Scope:
    The patent’s claims focus on specific chromatography processes, providing process-level exclusivity that can impact manufacturing activities of peptide therapeutics in Japan.

  • Strategic Positioning:
    Takeda’s filing aligns with a global patent strategy, aiming to safeguard proprietary manufacturing techniques, especially for high-value peptide drugs like insulin and GLP-1 analogs.

  • Patent Landscape Dynamics:
    This patent exists among a landscape of prior art detailing peptide purification, but its specific process parameters confer novelty and inventive step, bolstering its robustness.

  • Legal & Commercial Implications:
    Infringement risks exist for competitors employing similar chromatography steps; patent enforcement and licensing negotiations likely play vital roles.

  • Innovation Pathways:
    For innovators, developing alternative purification processes or different peptide modifications can circumvent this patent while advancing manufacturing efficiency.


FAQs

1. What are the distinctive features of the process claimed in JP2005533068?
The patent details a chromatography-based purification process involving specific solvents, ion-exchange media, and operational parameters designed to improve yield and purity for peptide drugs.

2. How does this patent impact peptide drug manufacturing in Japan?
It consolidates proprietary rights over certain purification techniques, potentially restricting third-party manufacturing that employs similar chromatography conditions without licensing.

3. Can the claims be bypassed by designing alternative purification methods?
Yes. By modifying chromatography conditions, employing different purification technologies, or changing process steps, manufacturers can design around the patent.

4. How does JP2005533068 relate to global peptide process patents?
It complements international patents owned by Takeda, creating a cohesive IP shield across key markets, especially under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings.

5. What are the risks of patent infringement for generic companies?
Using similar chromatography conditions or manufacturing processes that fall within the scope of the claims may lead to infringement litigation, financial damages, and market exclusion.


References

  1. Patent JP2005533068.
  2. Claims analysis based on the patent text.
  3. Takeda’s patent family filings and priority documents.
  4. Industry reports on peptide therapeutics patent landscape (e.g., WIPO and EPO filings).
  5. WO1999045924: Peptide purification method prior art.
  6. WO2004058444: Peptide stabilization method.

This analysis aims to aid strategic decision-making for pharmaceutical innovators, legal professionals, and patent portfolio managers involved with peptide therapeutics in Japan and beyond.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.