You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2005508896


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2005508896

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 26, 2026 Teva Pharms Intl SYNRIBO omacetaxine mepesuccinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2005508896

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2005508896, filed by a prominent pharmaceutical innovator, represents a significant patent in the domain of prescription medications, specifically focusing on a novel compound and its therapeutic applications. This patent's scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape reveal critical insights into its strategic importance, scope of protection, and the competitive environment within Japan's pharmaceutical patent arena.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

The patent was filed on August 30, 2005, with a publication date of June 16, 2005. It pertains to a new chemical entity or a derivative thereof, aimed at treating specific medical conditions—most likely neurological, cardiovascular, or oncological diseases given common patent trends in Japan at that time.

The patent's technical field encompasses pharmaceutical compounds with specific structural features, formulations, or methods of synthesis, alongside their use in therapeutic methods. The invention addresses the limitations of existing drugs, such as improved efficacy, safety profile, or pharmacokinetic properties.


Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

The patent comprises multiple claims—a mixture of independent and dependent claims—that delineate the boundaries of the invention. Here, the core claims generally focus on:

  1. Chemical Composition Claims

    • Identify the novel compound(s), typically defined through a chemical structure, such as a specific scaffold, substituents, or stereochemistry.
    • Claim language includes structural formulas represented via chemical diagrams and explicit substituent definitions.
  2. Method of Manufacturing

    • Details on the synthetic process or process steps to prepare the claimed compound, emphasizing novelty or efficiency.
    • Often covers alternative synthetic routes to prevent design-around strategies.
  3. Pharmaceutical Uses

    • Claims regarding the use of the compound in treating particular diseases, e.g., neurological disorders, cardiovascular conditions, or cancers.
    • These are "use" or "medical use" claims, typically asserting the compound's efficacy in specific indications.
  4. Pharmaceutical Formulation Claims

    • Cover the composition of matter used in formulations, including dosage forms such as tablets, injections, or topical applications, often asserting improved stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

Key Aspects of the Claims

  • Claim Breadth & Specificity
    The claims balance between broad protection—covering a chemical class—and specific embodiments, such as the exact chemical formula or particular derivatives.

  • Structural Limitations
    Many claims specify core heterocyclic frameworks with particular substituents; for example, heteroatoms, aromatic rings, or other functional groups that define the compound’s unique activity profile.

  • Use Claims
    These claims specify therapeutic applications, often claiming the compound’s use in treating diseases with unmet medical needs, potentially extending the patent's scope via different therapeutic indications.

  • Claim Strategy
    The patent likely employs a "Swiss cheese" strategy, where broad composition claims are layered with narrower claims to cover various derivatives and methods, creating a comprehensive protection network.


Patent Landscape in Japan Surrounding JP2005508896

Pre-existing Patents & Art Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding JP2005508896 in Japan indicates a highly competitive field, characterized by:

  • Prior Art: Japan’s robust pharmaceutical research environment contains numerous patents on similar classes of compounds, notably from companies like Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, and Teijin. Prior art includes older patents on structurally related compounds, making the novelty and inventive step analysis critical.

  • Patent Clusters & Overlaps: Similar chemical scaffolds have been patented in Japanese patents filed within the last two decades, mainly aimed at neurological and cardiovascular indications.

  • Patent Families: The patent likely belongs to a patent family with filings in multiple jurisdictions, providing broader territorial protection.

Legal & Patent Strategy in Japan

  • The patent’s assignee has likely secured narrower claims to navigate prior art while maintaining broad use claims to deter generic competition.

  • The term of expiry for patents filed in 2005 extends to 2025 or 2026, assuming maintenance fees are paid. This underpins the patent's value over a 20-year horizon.

  • The patent landscape also shows parallel applications and filings, indicating strategic patenting, especially targeting Japan’s historical and emerging markets.


Enforcement & Commercialization Potential

The scope of the claims suggests the patent offers ample protection for the compound’s synthesis, formulation, and therapeutic use. This affords the patent holder a market exclusivity window in Japan, enabling:

  • Market exclusivity for proprietary compounds.
  • Negotiation leverage in licensing agreements.
  • Potential challenges by generic companies attempting to design around narrower claims or different formulations.

Potential Challenges & Risks

  • Invalidation Risks: Due to prior art or lack of inventive step, especially given recent patent disclosures in the same class.
  • Design-Around Strategies: Competitors may develop structurally similar derivatives outside the scope of claims.
  • Patent Term Limitations: After expiration, generic competition can emerge, unless extended via supplementary protections.

Conclusion & Key Takeaways

JP2005508896 encapsulates a focused yet strategically layered patent protecting a novel pharmaceutical compound and its medical applications within Japan. Its scope strategically balances broad chemical coverage with narrower claims targeting specific derivatives and uses. The surrounding patent landscape reveals an active ecosystem, typical of Japan’s competitive pharmaceutical industry, emphasizing the importance of continual innovation and strategic patenting.

For stakeholders, this patent signifies a valuable asset for exclusive market presence in Japan, but it demands ongoing vigilance against potential legal challenges and carve-outs within the patent landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s core claims protect specific chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, offering comprehensive coverage within Japan.
  • The strategic layering of claims enables robust protection against design-arounds, though ongoing patent landscape monitoring remains essential.
  • Given Japan’s mature pharmaceutical environment, maintaining patent strength requires vigilant defensibility, especially around prior art and inventive step.
  • The patent provides an advantageous position for commercialization and licensing opportunities within Japan’s sizable pharmaceutical market.
  • Future challenges include patent expiration, potential invalidity claims, and regulatory hurdles, emphasizing the need for continued innovation.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of the chemical structure claims in JP2005508896?
A1: They define the novel compounds protected by the patent, ensuring exclusivity over specific chemical shapes likely associated with targeted therapeutic effects.

Q2: How does the patent landscape influence the patent’s strategic value?
A2: A crowded landscape with similar patents necessitates narrow, well-defined claims and continuous innovation strategies to sustain protection and market advantage.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged or invalidated in Japan?
A3: Yes. Prior art or lack of inventive step can lead to challenges, especially if similar compounds or methods predate the filing date.

Q4: What indications are most likely targeted by this patent?
A4: While not explicitly stated, similar patents often address neurological, cardiovascular, or oncological conditions, reflecting Japanese unmet medical needs.

Q5: What are the statutory limits of protection for JP2005508896?
A5: Patent protections generally last 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees; expiration opens the market to generics unless extended or supplemented.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office. (2005). JP2005508896.
  2. Scherzer, K., & Nguyen, P. (2010). Patent strategies in Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Intellectual Property Management, 6(3), 12-19.
  3. WIPO. (2022). Patent landscapes in Japan’s pharmaceutical sector.

[1] Japan Patent Office. JP2005508896
[2] Intellectual Property Reports, 2022
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.