You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Israel Patent: 223488


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Israel Patent: 223488

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,198,218 Jun 6, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
10,558,394 Jun 25, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
10,592,168 Jun 6, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
8,921,387 Jan 6, 2032 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
8,975,270 Sep 5, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Israel Patent IL223488

Last updated: September 15, 2025

Introduction

Israel Patent IL223488 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with implications for therapeutic agents, manufacturing processes, or formulations, relevant within the drug development sector. This patent's scope and claims critically influence its enforceability, competitive landscape, and strategic positioning in the global pharmaceutical patent ecosystem. Analyzing the claim structure, scope, and patent landscape offers insights into potential applications, risk mitigation, and market advantages.

Patent Overview and Basic Information

Israel patent IL223488 was granted in [Insert grant year], assigned to [Applicant/Assignee]. The patent claims follow the typical structure aimed at providing broad protection around a specific drug or method, with the aim of safeguarding the inventive concept against potential design-arounds or biosimilar competition. The patent's effective life, jurisdiction, and enforcement status further shape its strategic impact.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Set Structure

The patent likely comprises multiple independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: These define the core inventive concept, often encompassing the drug's chemical structure, formulation, synthesis process, or therapeutic application.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, adding specific features—such as particular substituents, dosage forms, or manufacturing conditions—that reinforce the patent's robustness.

The specificity of the claims directly impacts the patent's breadth and enforceability.

2. Claim Language and Terminology

  • Chemical and Structural Definitions: Precision in chemical structures—such as including or excluding specific substituents or stereochemistry—determines scope. Vague or broad language may invite challenges or carve-outs.

  • Method Claims: If present, these claims cover specific methods of synthesis or administration, which can offer additional layers of protection.

  • Therapeutic Claims: Protecting particular uses or indications of the drug enhances market exclusivity for specific diseases or conditions.

3. Scope of Protection

The scope hinges upon:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: If the patent covers a specific compound or class of compounds, the patent's protection is confined to those entities.

  • Formulation and Delivery Claims: Claims covering formulations, sustained-release systems, or combination therapies extend protection beyond the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

  • Method of Use Claims: These may restrict or expand the therapeutic applications protected.

4. Potential Limitations and Challenges

  • Prior Art and Novelty: The scope depends heavily on how unique the claimed compounds or methods are relative to prior art. Any significant overlap might limit enforceability or provoke invalidation proceedings.

  • Claim Breadth vs. Specificity: Overly broad claims risk invalidation, while too narrow claims limit commercial leverage.

  • Non-obviousness: The inventive step must be demonstrable; claims covering obvious modifications might be challenged.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Global Patent Families and Comparable Patents

Analyzing IL223488 within the global patent landscape entails:

  • Patent Families: Determining whether related patents exist in major jurisdictions—US, EU, China, etc.—to assess global scope.

  • Prior Art Cluster: Mapping similar inventions helps gauge the competitive environment.

2. Competitor Patents and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

  • Competitive Patents: Company portfolios may include similar compounds or methods, necessitating FTO analysis to mitigate infringement risks.

  • Potential Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents can complicate commercialization strategies.

3. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle Management

  • Expiry Dates: Patents typically last 20 years from filing; early filing or patent term extensions influence the patent's remaining protection window.

  • Orphan or Pediatric Extensions: Opportunities for supplementary protections in specific markets.

4. Current Litigation and Patent Challenges

Investigating ongoing or previous litigations or oppositions reveals the patent’s strength and vulnerability.

5. Patent Strategy and Market Position

  • Blocking Patents: The patent might serve as a barrier to market entry for competitors.

  • Licensing or Partnerships: The scope influences licensing negotiations and alliances.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Understanding the scope enables designing around the patent or licensing arrangements.

  • Investors: Patent strength correlates with market exclusivity and valuation.

  • Regulatory Bodies: Recognizing patent protections informs approval pathways and generic entry timelines.

Conclusion

Israel Patent IL223488 exemplifies a strategic patent in the pharmaceutical sector, with its scope defined by precise chemical, formulation, and method claims. The strength of its claims and the surrounding patent landscape pose significant implications for market exclusivity, licensing, and competitive positioning. A comprehensive understanding of these components facilitates informed decision-making for industry stakeholders.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broadness depends on meticulous claim drafting; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while narrowly tailored claims may limit market scope.
  • Analyzing the global patent family and existing patents reveals potential competition and FTO considerations.
  • Effective patent deadliness and strategic timing (e.g., extensions) extend market exclusivity.
  • Competitor patent landscapes shape licensing and infringement strategies.
  • Vigilant monitoring of legal challenges and patent expirations aids in lifecycle management.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of claims in pharmaceutical patents like IL223488?
Pharmaceutical patents generally include claims covering chemical compounds, formulations, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses. The scope varies from broad chemical classes to specific molecules, with dependent claims adding further detail. The balance between broad and narrow claims impacts enforceability and market exclusivity.

2. How does IL223488 fit within the global patent landscape?
The patent's family likely extends to major jurisdictions, creating a comprehensive protection strategy. The landscape includes similar patents protecting comparable compounds or methods, influencing licensing opportunities and freedom-to-operate considerations.

3. What are the common challenges faced by patents like IL223488?
Challenges include overcoming prior art rejections, validating inventive steps, avoiding overlaps with existing patents, and defending against invalidation or infringement claims. Patentability depends on demonstrating novelty and non-obviousness within the claims.

4. How can the scope of IL223488 be exploited commercially?
A broad patent scope enables exclusive rights over a range of compounds or uses, facilitating licensing deals, partnerships, or commercialization. Narrow claims may restrict applications but can reduce infringement risks.

5. What are strategic considerations for maintaining and leveraging this patent?
Continual monitoring of legal challenges, securing extensions, and aligning patent filings globally amplify market protection. Strategic licensing or collaboration can optimize portfolio value.


Sources

[1] Patent document IL223488
[2] WIPO Patent Database
[3] European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Landscape Reports

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.